Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
18 staffers per congress person? Well there's a place to start a cut back. Good grief, just do a quick $52k times 18 times congress members, woa Nellie!
Thanks for link, looked to me like they were all ‘entitled’ to 18, but maybe I missed something. Poor Senate only gets $3.3 mil for their expenses and can hire whatever they deem necessary.
I still contend is a tax payer rip off ‘perk’.
What will be interesting is to see how long her senior staff will be happy to take 40 or 50k less. They are the ones sacrificing not AOC who so far has not said xhe will use any of HER money to pay staff .
Ironically, being socialists, probably not very long.She is still paying the top people less than the going rate .
If the median is 157k for a chief of staff and she pays 80k how long will anyone accept that?
She is still paying the top people less than the going rate .
If the median is 157k for a chief of staff and she pays 80k how long will anyone accept that?
OMG is AOC can't hire the top staffers that would mean she will be uninformed on the issues. Can you imagine?
That's a good thing - it would be a total disaster if she actually managed to get some of her idiotic ideas enacted into law.She's there to grandstand and promote herself by creating sound bites, not to pass legislation.
That's a good thing - it would be a total disaster if she actually managed to get some of her idiotic ideas enacted into law.
Well, if you aren't there to actually pass legislation, you don't need people with policy expertise on your staff.
I think you're overestimating her understanding of legislation. She may well believe that what she put out there is exactly what legislation requires. It's kind of like when Kramer started working for that company in Seinfeld because he was bored or something, and he handed in a report that made no sense at all and was completely worthless. "It's almost like you've had no training whatsoever!"
Winner for best reference. “Jerry, you know this is my busy season!”I think you're overestimating her understanding of legislation. She may well believe that what she put out there is exactly what legislation requires. It's kind of like when Kramer started working for that company in Seinfeld because he was bored or something, and he handed in a report that made no sense at all and was completely worthless. "It's almost like you've had no training whatsoever!"
I would assume that Edward Markey who cosponsored the GND in the Senate made that clear to her but perhaps not.
Even if she COULD attract "top" candidates, they know it is a one and done and that it may be a stain on the resume to have AOC on the resume...At that pay, she won't attract the top people. Honestly, I don't think she thinks she needs it. Like most people her age, she probably thinks she knows everything and can manage everything.
She has a large pool of unemployed journalists to choose from.Even if she COULD attract "top" candidates, they know it is a one and done and that it may be a stain on the resume to have AOC on the resume...
Who knows, maybe she's right and that IS all that's needed for legislation. After all... most of the AHCA was generalities that got punted down to the bureaucrats to flesh out. "As determined by the regulatory body" is a pretty handy tool, I guess.
Is that all?
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC