AOC is correct...

Here's the fabulous couple--
Riley Roberts and AOC:

images
I guess we know who wears the pants in that family...
 
I hope you are applying that statement equally to the idiots marching in front of the homes of SCOTUS justices...
I think they're fools and I don't think they're right to do what they're doing. I do disagree that I don't think they're trying to get punched.
 
While a peaceful protest, with signs etc., on a public sidewalk by his house at reasonable times of the day is permissible, If they were disturbing the peace late at night, then the Justice(s) should have released a Rottweiler or two (or three) on them.

Like ?

The pro-abortion group ‘Ruth Sent Us’ suggested targeting the children of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett with protests against the court’s leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The group tweeted an infographic with the name of Barrett’s church. It also identified the school that Barrett’s children attend, and encouraged protesters to “voice your anger” by demonstrating there.


Pro-Abortion Group ‘Ruth Sent Us’ Suggests Targeting Amy Coney Barrett’s Children | National Review
 
Like ?

The pro-abortion group ‘Ruth Sent Us’ suggested targeting the children of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett with protests against the court’s leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The group tweeted an infographic with the name of Barrett’s church. It also identified the school that Barrett’s children attend, and encouraged protesters to “voice your anger” by demonstrating there.


Pro-Abortion Group ‘Ruth Sent Us’ Suggests Targeting Amy Coney Barrett’s Children | National Review
If they're disturbing the peace, blocking the road(s), or interfering with school operations, then they can be arrested. But if they just want to walk around like a bunch of yahoos on a public sidewalk outside a school building holding signs, then let them do it. There's a freedom to protest in this Country. They'll eventually get tired of it and move on to a fresh, new outrage of the month.
 
If they're disturbing the peace, blocking the road(s), or interfering with school operations, then they can be arrested. But if they just want to walk around like a bunch of yahoos on a public sidewalk outside a school building holding signs, then let them do it. There's a freedom to protest in this Country. They'll eventually get tired of it and move on to a fresh, new outrage of the month.

With that attitude, AOC needs to shut up and take the heckling.
 
If they're disturbing the peace, blocking the road(s), or interfering with school operations, then they can be arrested. But if they just want to walk around like a bunch of yahoos on a public sidewalk outside a school building holding signs, then let them do it. There's a freedom to protest in this Country. They'll eventually get tired of it and move on to a fresh, new outrage of the month.
18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

The law tends to disagree with you as relates to SCOTUS...
 
With that attitude, AOC needs to shut up and take the heckling.
Here's a historical event that touches on personally sh!t-talking a rep/Senator in person at the Congress building:

At the Senate, a Senator from Massachusetts slandered an older, feeble Senator from S. Carolina with some very ugly and personal language. The older S. Carolina Senator just so happened to be related to the younger Senator from S. Carolina.

The younger S. Carolina Senator beat the Massachusetts Senator nearly to death with his gold-knobbed cane--on the floor of the Senate. No criminal charges were filed against the S. Carolina Senator, and he was not expelled from the Senate. Rather, he was re-elected.
 
Basically, Riley should have b!tched slapped that clown for publicly insulting his fiance like that at the Capitol. If Riley wouldn't do it (oh, what great restraint young Riley showed... :rolleyes:), then AOC should've kicked him in the balls.
 


I guess I'm one of those people they made Idiocracy about. I crack up laughing hard when I watch that Ow My Balls "film" excerpt. (it's more-or-less the Three Stooges)
 
Here's a historical event that touches on personally sh!t-talking a rep/Senator in person at the Congress building:

At the Senate, a Senator from Massachusetts slandered an older, feeble Senator from S. Carolina with some very ugly and personal language. The older S. Carolina Senator just so happened to be related to the younger Senator from S. Carolina.

The younger S. Carolina Senator beat the Massachusetts Senator nearly to death with his gold-knobbed cane--on the floor of the Senate. No criminal charges were filed against the S. Carolina Senator, and he was not expelled from the Senate. Rather, he was re-elected.
That goes back to what they said about Ted Cruz. He could be shot dead on the senate floor and they wouldn’t find a witness of said crime. Policing their own.
 
If they're disturbing the peace, blocking the road(s), or interfering with school operations, then they can be arrested. But if they just want to walk around like a bunch of yahoos on a public sidewalk outside a school building holding signs, then let them do it. There's a freedom to protest in this Country. They'll eventually get tired of it and move on to a fresh, new outrage of the month.

With that attitude, AOC needs to shut up and take the heckling.

There is a difference between the protesting at the justices's homes and the ******* ****-talking AOC. The problem with the protests at their homes is that it's more than protest. It's an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice basically through intimidation and terrorism - more like Capitol rioters at least in regard to intent and purpose. That's why it's against the law. Furthermore, it's a reasonable restriction on the time, place, and manner of speech and doesn't violate the Constitution. There are other ways to protest - like outside the Court.

The guy heckling AOC is just an *******. He has a constitutional right to do that outside the Capitol office building because he's not trying to interfere with her duties, but he's clearly provoking her and her fiance. If he got kicked in the nuts, I wouldn't sympathize with him.
 
Here's a historical event that touches on personally sh!t-talking a rep/Senator in person at the Congress building:

At the Senate, a Senator from Massachusetts slandered an older, feeble Senator from S. Carolina with some very ugly and personal language. The older S. Carolina Senator just so happened to be related to the younger Senator from S. Carolina.

The younger S. Carolina Senator beat the Massachusetts Senator nearly to death with his gold-knobbed cane--on the floor of the Senate. No criminal charges were filed against the S. Carolina Senator, and he was not expelled from the Senate. Rather, he was re-elected.

Historical sure, but senator on senator violence is still different than the two cases presented with justices or AOC.
 
I wonder if AOC had thst stupid azz reason already made up , that walking with your hands behind you looking as if you are handcuffed is the proper was to walk when being detained
Or if she scrambled to make it up when she got called out?
 
I wonder if AOC had thst stupid azz reason already made up , that walking with your hands behind you looking as if you are handcuffed is the proper was to walk when being detained
Or if she scrambled to make it up when she got called out?
The catch-22 of her claim is that the very moment she raised her fist, she gave the officer valid grounds to take the detainee TO the ground. The officer showed restraint in not dusting her for the gesture of seeking to evade control of the officer...
 
Why do cops bother arresting AOC and her ilk but no SC justice protesters? And for a $50 fine? It should be a lot more, but PACs would just pay it anyway.
 
Guy
They were "detained" not arrested. It was nothing more than a virtue signaling stunt likely coordinated with Capitol police.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top