weird#60 is a goofy number
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
weird#60 is a goofy number
Good insight Rick, thanks for pointing this out.I think the number convention can be traced back to two way players. Often, the linebackers were guards and centers. I think Nobis was the center on offense if I remember correctly.
Hence linebackers were usually wearing 50's and 60's.
Well, now you have. Some jersey numbers are universally recognized and accepted as cool, i.e. #s 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 32, 33, 34, etc. Some numbers not so much, i.e. #s 15, 17, 27, 31, 37, 38, 43, etc. Some numbers are atrociously goofy and typically relegated to the scrubs that will never see the field. #60 is a goofy number. It's too bad such a great player and UT icon wore such a goofy number.In all my years of following football, I have NEVER heard of a fan thinking a number was "goofy".
We have had some players that were goofy enough to have worn 25 1/2 if they could have. That said, I don't give a **** what any other schools or teams do. At THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS wearing that jersey is one of the highest honors a player can receive, some have deserved that honor, some may be questionable - then there's Brian Jones.
With that, I invite you to put me on "ignore"
DJ was wise to reject #60, not even he could make it look cool. His PR agent probably helped him invent the "start my own legacy" excuse. I'm willing to wager the grand total of UT players requesting to wear #60 is exactly zero. It's a goofy number.Derek Johnson rejected #60 when it was offered to him. He said he wanted to start his own legacy. He wore #11 while at Texas.
The last regular wearer of #60 was Brian Jones, I believe. The greatest #60 I ever saw live was Britt Hager. Doesn't he still have the record for total career tackles?
DJ was wise to reject #60, not even he could make it look cool. His PR agent probably helped him invent the "start my own legacy" excuse. I'm willing to wager the grand total of UT players requesting to wear #60 is exactly zero. It's a goofy number.
I think YOU are a goofy number. {<;Well, now you have. Some jersey numbers are universally recognized and accepted as cool, i.e. #s 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 32, 33, 34, etc. Some numbers not so much, i.e. #s 15, 17, 27, 31, 37, 38, 43, etc. Some numbers are atrociously goofy and typically relegated to the scrubs that will never see the field. #60 is a goofy number. It's too bad such a great player and UT icon wore such a goofy number.
You would be very much wrong.First, I don't think you ever played a sport that had you pick a jersey with a number on it.
I'm sure that was the case in the 60s and maybe into the 70s, but news flash, that was 50+ years ago. If #60 is such a popular jersey number, please provide a list of premier college and/or NFL LBs that have donned the vaunted #60 over the past, oh let's say 25 years. I'm quite confident the list will be brief.AS SUCH a lot of kid's playing linebacker wore #60 during the time NOBIS played.
Also, I will bet you a million dollars that every new linebacker recruit that showed up on UT campus (after Nobis graduated) wanted to wear #60. One of the reason's it was set aside until a player played 'well enough' to deserve it was because the coaches didn't know who they should let wear it.
Just making conversation.Strange hill to die on (and I have died on some strange hills).
The board right now on the #60.Or he could be just yanking everybody's chain out of boredom.
I believe that DJ did wear # 60 in at least one game, perhaps the 2005 Rose Bowl against Michigan.Derek Johnson rejected #60 when it was offered to him. He said he wanted to start his own legacy. He wore #11 while at Texas.
IMHO the fact that # 60 has not been retired brings more attention to Tommy Nobis – one of the greatest Longhorns in our glorious history – then would be the case if the number had been retired. Certainly in recent years, only a handful of players have been given the opportunity to wear number 60, and only (I believe) for one game. Didn’t Breckyn Hager wear it for a game?Tommy Nobis was the embodiment of the core of Darrell Royal football and loyalty. There are other jerseys which should probably be retired, but NONE more deserving than #60.
Far from ignorant, I'm quite the expert on my own opinion. That's what I'm doing here, sharing my opinion. IMO, #60 is a goofy jersey number. You continue to confuse my comments about jersey #60 with somehow disparaging the career and contributions of Tommy Nobis. That is not the case.You're not making "conversation", you are showing your overwhelming ignorance, the fact that you are not now and never have been a student of the game, and my best guess is either an Aggie, State Penn or Colorado fan, as those are the only fans I have run into with such great insight.
Sorry to have to correct you again sir, but I stated #37 was "not so much" as in, meh, not great, but not horrible. #60 is goofy.The University did indeed "retire" #60, as well as 22, 10, 34 (although Ricky wore "goofy #37" a couple of times, 12, & 20.
10?Well,I might as well get my 2 cents in here. #60 should be a revered number to all longhorn fans(especially old folks). Just like # 20 and 34 and 16.
I'm sure you are also an expert on your own a-hole. Go back & check your 1st few posts on the topic. Your are NOT expressing it as "IMO", rather you are expressing what you consider factual as such.Far from ignorant, I'm quite the expert on my own opinion. That's what I'm doing here, sharing my opinion. IMO, #60 is a goofy jersey number. You continue to confuse my comments about jersey #60 with somehow disparaging the career and contributions of Tommy Nobis. That is not the case.
It's okay to disagree Sabre, no need to sling insults.
LOL. So on an internet bulletin board site, you need an "IMO" disclaimer for you to understand it's someone's opinion? That's as goofy as the #60 on a football jersey. IMO, that is.I'm sure you are also an expert on your own a-hole. Go back & check your 1st few posts on the topic. Your are NOT expressing it as "IMO", rather you are expressing what you consider factual as such.
So, I revert to MY original opinion that "you are a goofy number."
And as such, I maintain my assertion that YOU are a goofy number.LOL. So on an internet bulletin board site, you need an "IMO" disclaimer for you to understand it's someone's opinion? That's as goofy as the #60 on a football jersey. IMO, that is.