For her to say those DEI policies do not prevent more qualified students from getting in is such BS
It's impossible for them not to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For her to say those DEI policies do not prevent more qualified students from getting in is such BS
She tried to cover it up by saying these students worked hard. Of course one can work hard and still get in via DEI because one can work hard and not get into UT.It's impossible for them not to.
She tried to cover it up by saying these students worked hard. Of course one can work hard and still get in via DEI because one can work hard and not get into UT.
that feels familiar some how....Harris County has a new definition of equity.
![]()
Do I have or do I lack socio-emotionally Intelligent Equity?
Harris County Equity Guidelines
Harris County has a new definition of equity.
![]()
Do I have or do I lack socio-emotionally Intelligent Equity?
Harris County Equity Guidelines
They are in total lunacy at this point. And of course, any "plan" that implements these definitions of equity are flagrantly illegal.
It is legal based on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It is illegal based on the 1789 Constitution.
Are current federal bureaucracy ignores one and implements the other.
It's pretty revealing that airlines ever went along in the first place in light of the potential losses and liabilities that can happen with a plane crash.
1. An aircraft worth at least tens but often hundreds of millions is destroyed.
2. Tens to hundreds of wrongful death lawsuits to deal with.
3. Liability for anything and anyone on the ground that gets destroyed.
4. Massive negative publicity for the airline that can last a long time. (I still joke that Delta stands for Doesn't Ever Leave the Airport after that crash at DFW - in 1988.)
It's the kind of thing that can destroy an airline. If they're willing to take chances just to be politically correct, that tells me there's government in the equation in a big way. They assume bailouts are always on the table like banks do.
Every American airline knows Uncle Sam will bail them out, if they ask. They also thought the public would attack if they didn't do DEI.
Let the lawsuits fly.
I'm sure many org's think they just have to weather this 4 year DJT window. We need to get several cases on the books that undo Dem lunacy so that future AA efforts will be harder to justify. We need someone to take a case forward where the institution is still implementing DEI/AA and has just watered it down and relabeled it to avoid scrutiny.Oh my God, I hope so. Unfortunately the Civil Rights Act and following racial equality laws do give corporations a leg to stand on. Laws don't do what the legislation title says unfortunately.
Oh my God, I hope so. Unfortunately the Civil Rights Act and following racial equality laws do give corporations a leg to stand on. Laws don't do what the legislation title says unfortunately.
Views on race is one of Roberts’ few redeeming qualities.What you need is SCOTUS to get one of these cases and totally and unequivocally shred all quotas or "goals" of any kind apart. No reason why it can't or wouldn't. Even Roberts is pretty hostile to it.
I'm sure many org's think they just have to weather this 4 year DJT window. We need to get several cases on the books that undo Dem lunacy so that future AA efforts will be harder to justify. We need someone to take a case forward where the institution is still implementing DEI/AA and has just watered it down and relabeled it to avoid scrutiny.
Who thinks it will come out that the files had already been deleted?
There is an electronic chain showing who did what and when. If they resort to the Hilliary solution or intentionally try/accomplish to destroy the hard drive, Bondi's people will see that they will be the guest at a federal detention center for a long time.Who thinks it will come out that the files had already been deleted?
Yes it is!
Yeah. We need this 1000000 times. But we will have to get rid of the CRA for that to happen. We have a constitution within the Constitution that must be deleted.
CRA is never going away, even if it is unconstitutional in most cases. However, the disparate impact doctrine could get overruled, and that would go a long way. Again, this is the kind of issue on which Roberts is pretty solid.