Affirmative Action is now dead

She tried to cover it up by saying these students worked hard. Of course one can work hard and still get in via DEI because one can work hard and not get into UT.

They're full of unfalsifiable and unquantifiable comments about people "working hard." It's horse crap. Let's see these people's GPAs and SAT scores. They're gonna suck. You know how I know? Because they wouldn't need DEI measures if they didn't suck.
 

poor guy or gal (or they) lol

"
The email goes on to assert that DEI programs are in danger not just at Microsoft, but across all businesses:

"Unofficially in my opinion, not specific to Microsoft alone, but [conservative policy plan] Project 2025 looms and true systems change work associated with DEI programs everywhere are no longer business critical or smart as they were in 2020. Hence the purposeful and strategic 3-5 year shelf life of many company's inclusion commitments post the murder of George Floyd are being reevaluated," the email reads. "And the way I see it, the timing was impeccable so businesses everywhere could reevaluate the path forward should their U.S. federal contracts be at risk if the work continues on its face."
"
 
Harris County has a new definition of equity.

1721683972047.png

Do I have or do I lack socio-emotionally Intelligent Equity? :confused2:

Harris County Equity Guidelines
 
Harris County has a new definition of equity.

1721683972047.png

Do I have or do I lack socio-emotionally Intelligent Equity? :confused2:

Harris County Equity Guidelines
that feels familiar some how....

“I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as a career. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed.”​

― Lloyd Dobler "Say Anything"
 
They are in total lunacy at this point. And of course, any "plan" that implements these definitions of equity are flagrantly illegal.

It is legal based on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It is illegal based on the 1789 Constitution.

Are current federal bureaucracy ignores one and implements the other.
 
It is legal based on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It is illegal based on the 1789 Constitution.

Are current federal bureaucracy ignores one and implements the other.

Even the Civil Rights Act needs a lot of word-twisting by the administrative state (like the EEOC and others) and the federal courts up make it even arguably legal under the Civil Rights Act. Also, it took a massive torturing of the commerce clause by the Warren Court to make the Civil Rights Act constitutional in the first place.
 


It's pretty revealing that airlines ever went along in the first place in light of the potential losses and liabilities that can happen with a plane crash.

1. An aircraft worth at least tens but often hundreds of millions is destroyed.

2. Tens to hundreds of wrongful death lawsuits to deal with.

3. Liability for anything and anyone on the ground that gets destroyed.

4. Massive negative publicity for the airline that can last a long time. (I still joke that Delta stands for Doesn't Ever Leave the Airport after that crash at DFW - in 1988.)

It's the kind of thing that can destroy an airline. If they're willing to take chances just to be politically correct, that tells me there's government in the equation in a big way. They assume bailouts are always on the table like banks do.
 
It's pretty revealing that airlines ever went along in the first place in light of the potential losses and liabilities that can happen with a plane crash.

1. An aircraft worth at least tens but often hundreds of millions is destroyed.

2. Tens to hundreds of wrongful death lawsuits to deal with.

3. Liability for anything and anyone on the ground that gets destroyed.

4. Massive negative publicity for the airline that can last a long time. (I still joke that Delta stands for Doesn't Ever Leave the Airport after that crash at DFW - in 1988.)

It's the kind of thing that can destroy an airline. If they're willing to take chances just to be politically correct, that tells me there's government in the equation in a big way. They assume bailouts are always on the table like banks do.

Every American airline knows Uncle Sam will bail them out, if they ask. They also thought the public would attack if they didn't do DEI.
 
Every American airline knows Uncle Sam will bail them out, if they ask. They also thought the public would attack if they didn't do DEI.

It's one of the most corporate welfare/government-driven industries in the economy. First, every airliner is a spinoff of a USAF transport, in-flight refueling, or bomber project. Neither the airlines nor the aircraft manufacturers do anything without big infusions of government cash for R&D. Had the military never contracted for the KC-135, C-141, and B-52, would we even be flying in jets today? Almost surely not.

Second, virtually every airport is a government project and often a former military base.

Third, the industry has already received bailout money in the past.

Fourth, airlines get money for carrying the mail.

It's a little less of a government industry than the post office is.
 
Oh my God, I hope so. Unfortunately the Civil Rights Act and following racial equality laws do give corporations a leg to stand on. Laws don't do what the legislation title says unfortunately.
I'm sure many org's think they just have to weather this 4 year DJT window. We need to get several cases on the books that undo Dem lunacy so that future AA efforts will be harder to justify. We need someone to take a case forward where the institution is still implementing DEI/AA and has just watered it down and relabeled it to avoid scrutiny.
 
Oh my God, I hope so. Unfortunately the Civil Rights Act and following racial equality laws do give corporations a leg to stand on. Laws don't do what the legislation title says unfortunately.

What you need is SCOTUS to get one of these cases and totally and unequivocally shred all quotas or "goals" of any kind apart. No reason why it can't or wouldn't. Even Roberts is pretty hostile to it.
 
What you need is SCOTUS to get one of these cases and totally and unequivocally shred all quotas or "goals" of any kind apart. No reason why it can't or wouldn't. Even Roberts is pretty hostile to it.
Views on race is one of Roberts’ few redeeming qualities.
 
I'm sure many org's think they just have to weather this 4 year DJT window. We need to get several cases on the books that undo Dem lunacy so that future AA efforts will be harder to justify. We need someone to take a case forward where the institution is still implementing DEI/AA and has just watered it down and relabeled it to avoid scrutiny.

I agree. If the cases against anti-white bias win in court. Then there would be precedence to get rid of the rest of the Civil Rights Act legal regime. Then we could get back to the original Constitutional order.
 
Who thinks it will come out that the files had already been deleted?
There is an electronic chain showing who did what and when. If they resort to the Hilliary solution or intentionally try/accomplish to destroy the hard drive, Bondi's people will see that they will be the guest at a federal detention center for a long time.
 
Yeah. We need this 1000000 times. But we will have to get rid of the CRA for that to happen. We have a constitution within the Constitution that must be deleted.

CRA is never going away, even if it is unconstitutional in most cases. However, the disparate impact doctrine could get overruled, and that would go a long way. Again, this is the kind of issue on which Roberts is pretty solid.
 
CRA is never going away, even if it is unconstitutional in most cases. However, the disparate impact doctrine could get overruled, and that would go a long way. Again, this is the kind of issue on which Roberts is pretty solid.

Well. My comment wasn't saying it would or wouldn't but on how necessary it is to dismantle it if the attacks on white people are ever going to end. The attacks happen because there is legislation calling for it. I'm not a conservative so I have no problem thinking we can get rid of bad laws and bad precedents.
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top