Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. We killed more Japanese and German children than they did of ours. Were we still the good guys? Damn straight we were. We didn't give a **** about being "proportional" because we actually cared about winning the damn war and ending it.
I would hate to try to win a war against the Axis Powers with this modern mindset.
War is brutal, absolutely brutal. But is there anything that would have stopped the Nazi's or Japanese other than all out war? The same can be said for the imperialists of today.
Yes, it's horrible children are being killed, but how many more Jews of all ages would have been murdered, and Europeans of all ages been executed if the Allies hadn't stopped them? And if atrocities bother you, don't start reading about the horrible, despicable torture carried out by the Japanese.
It doesn't dehumanise them. It puts the moral blame for their deaths where it belongs, which is on the evil people, not on those fighting evil. It also denies the evil people the benefit and incentive of using innocents as human shields. It may seem more magnanimous in the short term to let them get away with it, but long term it leads to more death.
And Israel isn't overreacting. They've been haggling with these people for over 70 years. They've extended many olive branches to them, and they still try to kill them. If a peaceful resolution can be reached, that's fine, but until the hostages are returned and Hamas is completely stripped of its power, Israel shouldn't even be at the negotiating table.
Mona, so it is okay to let Hamas and Hezbollah keep lobbing rockets into Israel and injuring/maiming/killing Israelis?
Why do assume the Israeli’s are going to bomb buildings? I heard they were going to plug the tunnels and wait them out.You can say it doesn't dehumanize them. But saying their lives aren't important enough to question what is going on does in fact dehumanize them. Christians included. The blame for the dead civilians is for those who kill them. That is what justice is. Placing them in a group of "evil" is collectivism.
Where is the evidence of human shields? Can you describe for me what Hamas is doing? The leaders of Hamas don't live in Gaza. Why not go after them where they live? Are you saying that Hamas was in the church annex building that was bombed last week? This is a narrative that everyone believes in, and it is plausible. I don't think Hamas are above it or anything other than murderers. But there is lots of data being shown right now that calls the idea of human shields into question.
It also ignores the fact Israel killed hundreds and even a few thousands of civilians by sniper. They have shot kids and elderly in the streets on purpose.
It doesn't sound like you are really concerned with hostages either. Is bombing buildings the way you get hostages out of Gaza? That doesn't make any sense. I agree that forces should be used to go free hostages. Taking Hamas out and freeing hostages is the right thing to do.
If any element of the far left or libertarian foreign policy had sway, we wouldn't exist as a nation today. We would have gotten our asses handed to us. If you want to look for a perverse silver lining, had we fought that way, the current Palestinian - Israeli conflict wouldn't be happening, because Jews would basically be an extinct demographic by now. Instead, Muslims would just be murdering each other in the Middle East, meaning nobody would care about it for the same reason nobody cares about black-on-black crime in the US. There'd be no political advantage to be gained from it.
Why do assume the Israeli’s are going to bomb buildings? I heard they were going to plug the tunnels and wait them out.
Those people are stupid. And they're just bringing down curses upon themselves. And then they wonder why they are almost always history's losers, generation-after-generation, century-after-century.This is insane.
No Mona you and the President of the United States do not understand the problem because it isn't in your backyard.Is it okay to let them? Twisted way of asking a question. It is evil to shoot rockets at other people. But is that the only thing going on here? This is a dishonest question in that it ignores at least half of what is going on.
Would I prefer that Israel doesn't let Hamas to shoot rockets at them? Yes. Go stop Hamas then. But when 90% of the people killed by Israel aren't in Hamas, new crimes have been committed.
No Mona you and the President of the United States do not understand the problem because it isn't in your backyard.
So kill all the Palestinian civilians? Podhoretz has been calling for the US to kill on Israel's behalf for decades and before that his dad.
It is a weird kind of collectivism where Palestinian citizens are equated with Hamas. Then attack those who haven't committed the evil not those who have actually done it.
You can say it doesn't dehumanize them. But saying their lives aren't important enough to question what is going on does in fact dehumanize them.
Christians included. The blame for the dead civilians is for those who kill them. That is what justice is. Placing them in a group of "evil" is collectivism.
Where is the evidence of human shields? Can you describe for me what Hamas is doing? The leaders of Hamas don't live in Gaza. Why not go after them where they live?
Are you saying that Hamas was in the church annex building that was bombed last week? This is a narrative that everyone believes in, and it is plausible. I don't think Hamas are above it or anything other than murderers. But there is lots of data being shown right now that calls the idea of human shields into question.
It also ignores the fact Israel killed hundreds and even a few thousands of civilians by sniper. They have shot kids and elderly in the streets on purpose.
It doesn't sound like you are really concerned with hostages either. Is bombing buildings the way you get hostages out of Gaza? That doesn't make any sense. I agree that forces should be used to go free hostages. Taking Hamas out and freeing hostages is the right thing to do.
You are saying that if the US continued with the foreign policy of the founding fathers then we wouldn't be a nation anymore. We had to reject the founding generation and become a more European style imperial power.
The US had to fund the USSR and ally ourselves with literally the most evil country that has ever existed in the history of the world in order to survive. I don't buy it.
Now the thinking is if the US/Israel doesn't think of Palestinians like the Nazis thought about Jews then they wouldn't exist.
It is an impressive psyop that the Israeli and US government have played on the American population. We actively give our sons' lives, money, and weapons over to another country with nothing in return. The US government may get something back in return but the American are getting stolen from and killed for the sake of the rich and powerful.
We're not getting stolen from. We've generally elected pro-Israel governments for decades. Aiding Israel is something the American people generally support.
That's just hyperbolic garbage. We don't think that, and no serious human thinks that.
That lasted about ten minutes. I consider Jefferson a "founding father," and his administration and foreign policy was miles from yours. For starters, we were engaged in massive territorial expansion (actual conquest - far more aggressive than anything we do today) almost from the beginning. On and off, we waged war from about 1801 - 1815 against the Barbary Pirates literally on the other side of the world.
The biggest difference back then was that we didn't a large permanent army. Back when it took months or even a year for a war to actually start, that worked fine. That isn't the case anymore.
You don't have to buy it, but we considered Nazi Germany to be a more imminent threat than the USSR. You can argue that we shouldn't have, but that really isn't the point. It's an anecdote, not a broad policy. (My personal belief is that we were right to aid the USSR to keep Hitler from taking over the Soviet Union but that we should have listened to Patton after the war.)
- The Soviets -- bad dudes, real bad dudes. Totalitarians, anti-freedom, anti-free speech, anti-capitalist, anti-life, anti-religion, police state, etc. Despite their theory, in practice they were highly prejudicial to ethnic and religious minorities. But, compared with the Nazis, they were equal opportunity killers. And they didn't set out to annihilate any religion or ethnic group.