Deez, I think you are correct about Iowa and other bread basket states.
But would you think that eliminating subsidies might actually help the farms? Maybe not. But I was thinking maybe the subsidies and regulations force them to grow a certain type of crop. Maybe with out the government influence they would find new crops that are higher value to grow or be able to more quickly improve yields.
Maybe not, but I am wondering if this issue isn't more complicated than it seems.
Long term I think they'd be better off without subsidies and regulations. However, people who are getting free money rarely want to give that up. For example, if we got rid of the federal student loan program (which we treat as free money even though it's not), there's no question that it would ultimately benefit students, because their tuition would fall dramatically. But how many students would actually support doing that? Damn near none.