Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I am sure a Dem can explain it.
Dominion ownership is hard to pin down due to an almost endless stream of shell corporations (why would they do that if they are above board?)
But one thing we do know is the CCP recently put $400M into them (apparently this past October)
Why would China do that? What did China want? What exactly were they buying?
One thing for certain, that is a lot more money being into our election than what Russia spent on FB ads - and look what happened because of that?
Need the full flavor of Melissa Carone. Republican Congressman Steve Johnson is asking the question but she clearly is treating him like she thinks he's a Democrat. Notice at one point Guiliani reaches over to touch her arm to get her attention to stop only to have her go off that Dead and illegals voted.
That's a highlight of her testimony but the entire thing is good if you want a laugh. At least 4 judges in Michigan so far have found her affidavit to not be credible. My favorite was when she boasted "I have 2 degrees" ostensibly to demonstrate her bonafides. Those degrees are a BA from ITT Technical Institute and a more recent Associates Degree from U of Michigan. The latter doesn't offer "Associate's Degrees".
No, she hasn't been "doxxed". Aside from joining the MI lawsuit that was tossed she's been all over FoxNews and Lou Dobbs' show. She's leveraging her 15 minutes of fame to the max.
She signed a legal affidavit. Prove her wrong and put her in jail or throw out the election. Anyone who doesn’t think there were problems with the election is stupid, a Democrat or both.
I have no idea whether it is or not. My concern is there are many of these affidavits, but there is no quantity specified that equates to “widespread” problems.
And as an attorney, I’m sure you have seen fairness and reasonableness in the courts. As a business person, I haven’t
When I see what the justice department-in different areas- has done over the last 8 years, I have no faith in it. It is a rigged political monster at this point.
She is ridiculous. Amusing but ridiculous.
Need the full flavor of Melissa Carone. Republican Congressman Steve Johnson is asking the question but she clearly is treating him like she thinks he's a Democrat. Notice at one point Guiliani reaches over to touch her arm to get her attention to stop only to have her go off that Dead and illegals voted.
That's a highlight of her testimony but the entire thing is good if you want a laugh. At least 4 judges in Michigan so far have found her affidavit to not be credible. My favorite was when she boasted "I have 2 degrees" ostensibly to demonstrate her bonafides. Those degrees are a BA from ITT Technical Institute and a more recent Associates Degree from U of Michigan. The latter doesn't offer "Associate's Degrees".
No, she hasn't been "doxxed". Aside from joining the MI lawsuit that was tossed she's been all over FoxNews and Lou Dobbs' show. She's leveraging her 15 minutes of fame to the max.
According to the Mail, Ms Carone, 33, was sentenced last September to 12 months of probation for an as-yet-unreported incident in 2018, which court documents refer to as “disorderly circumstances warranting alarm” and “computers-using to commit a crime.”
All of the claims are independent. So her claim is not “enough“ for that jurisdiction. What if there are 50, 100, or 1,000 claims all independently immaterial, but collectively are a problem?I think most of us would agree that it should be hard to vacate an election. One affidavit definitely can't be enough. If it is, all the Texas Democratic Party would have to do is find someone willing to lie in an affidavit (very easy - they had a president willing to lie under oath before a grand jury) and present it before a slimy district judge. In the Rio Grande Valley, those are a dime a dozen. They'd never lose a statewide office in Texas.
Another thing to remember is that an affidavit isn't meant to prove anything. In fact, it's hearsay. It's intended to create a question of fact for a trier of fact (a judge or jury) to decide. To actually get a judge to vacate the election, this lady would have to testify in court and get cross-examined. Furthermore, the Democrats would get to call witnesses who would contradict her. If you're a judge or juror and you here a weird story from a very weird lady and then hear 100 others who don't seem weird testifying that she's totally full of crap, whom would you believe? If we're being honest and disregarding our preferred outcome, most of us are going to believe the 100 others, especially when she's asking you to vacate a presidential election.
That could be a very lengthy thread all on its own.
I can see why you'd think that, but this isn't the Justice Department. It's a state proceeding before relatively unremarkable local officials and potentially before the Michigan state legislature.
Iliberalism doesn't mean what Soros thinks it means
* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC