Yeah, Will.. I'm sorry but I don't see this.
You see evidence to suggest something. You seek further proof or for a reasonable, alternate explanation. You find none. You then take legal action to further explore and receive remedy if proven in court. We are at the point where there is evidence of likely wrongdoing and moving through the next steps. If you see it differently I'm fine w with that and respect your views. You seem like a genuine dude. But many are not and nothing will appease them... literally no amount of evidence would be enough to justify suspicion even much less legal action. That position is absurd to me. People say they want to get rid of someone they hate, they try everything for 4 years, they say they won't let him win the election, they basically tell you what they are going to do, then you see signs and evidence that they are indeed doing it.....there is every good reason at that point to take the position taken by the President and his supporters.
We can all argue about what constitutes evidence all day long. In my view, there is plenty in some of these states and, again, that is why legal action is proceeding.