Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Want to guess who James Clyburn (D-SC) blames for Conyer's troubles?
[/s
Who doesn’t?Not too surprised. When Conyers was on Nixon's enemies list, it was suggested that he had a "weakness for white women."
Who doesn’t?
I think several Dems will get on board once they are convinced it will pass. There is another election on the way.
Another poll out on Alabama
This one by Atlantic Media and Research
Has Moore up 8
As of this moment (9 days to go), looks like it his trending his way and that Moore is going to win
The poll has Moore with 48 percent support to Jones' 40 percent, according to weighted data. That's an improvement of 5 points since the same firm released a poll last week.
At least four polls have been released this week and all four have put Moore in the lead. The 8-point advantage, however, is his largest lead of the week.
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/roy_moore_says_campaign_moment.html
You voted for Hillary and now you find your moral compass? Child please!
To be clear, I'm not advocating for a an AL Republican to vote for Doug Jones. I understand that someone disagrees with his policy stances. Voting FOR Moore is an affirmation that his behavior was acceptable. I'd say the same for a MN voter and AL Franken.There is another way to look at the Moore election. SH (whom I respect and he knows it) is essentially concurring with the commonly discussed political narrative - that voters in Alabama are likely to choose a "party over integrity" by electing Moore. However, there's another way to look at the situation. How did the Alabama Democratic Party get so far out of its state's political mainstream that its voters are willing to elect a probable child molester over one of their candidates? (Of course, national political commentators aren't going to ask that question, because Jones isn't outside of their political mainstream.)
Suppose that instead of nominating an abortion rights hardliner like Jones, Alabama Democrats had nominated a candidate similar to its last Democratic senator, Howell Heflin? He was a fiscal moderate and social conservative - something that used to be common among southern Democrats. If they had nominated someone like that, would Moore be favored to win this election? Unlikely.
And let's flip the scenario. Let's take a state like Rhode Island that is lopsidedly blue like Alabama is lopsidedly red. Suppose Jack Reed was up for reelection, and after he was nominated it was found out that he molested a teenage girl back in the '70s. If the Rhode Island GOP had nominated somebody like Lincoln Chafee (who was socially liberal and fiscally moderate), Reed might be in trouble. But what if they nominated somebody like Ted Cruz? Would people say Rhode Island voters were putting "party over integrity" if they reelected Reed? No. They'd say that the Cruz starter kit was so far out of Rhode Island's political mainstream that people would choose the child molester over their nominee.
The swamp never ends, it just changes names every 50 years or so
That's the case for both parties routinely. I still remember the 90s and the cries of "character doesn't matter" as the Dems dismissed Clinton's multiple charges of sexual harassment and rape.They chose party over integrity.
Yep. "Character doen't matter" and "It's only sex, it does not affect his job".
**** every one of those two faced, worthless pieces of ****.
Based on the Dem's logic, why do you care who Roy Moore fucks?
Don't bother answering, you know it is simply because there is an R appended to his name.
Nope.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC