From what I've read Tucker didn't act like he believed it. Lou Dobbs did believe it.
Was Tucker Carlson fired for Political Expedience?
- Thread starter utahorn
- Start date
From what I've read Tucker didn't act like he believed it. Lou Dobbs did believe it.
Dominion lawsuit disclosures. I'll provide links when I have time.
Forbes reported that his ad revenues dropped by over 40 per cent in a two year period
the way he was going he was going to be selling pillows, EDS elixirs and Scholls foot remedies in another year or so
Fox is doing a makeover. Lawsuits are expensive even if you win. The National Enquirer reformed itself so Murdoch can do it too
the way he was going he was going to be selling pillows, EDS elixirs and Scholls foot remedies in another year or so
Fox is doing a makeover. Lawsuits are expensive even if you win. The National Enquirer reformed itself so Murdoch can do it too
Actually no need for me to link. Just do a web search with the terms Carlson , Dominion, and email disclosure. Then you can choose the media you choose to believe. How many Fox viewers , just after the election, would have tolerated news from a source that openly admitted thinking the election fraud allegations were the work of wacky, unhinged liars?
I still do not believe that Biden won, fair and square. Despite the Dominion machines, look at ballot harvesting - someone shows up and takes your ballot - does it get counted? Poll watchers being sent home while ballots are counted. Not just Fox. Does this make sense to anyone?
I never called anyone a liar; I just want to trust the election results no matter who wins. That is democracy.
I never called anyone a liar; I just want to trust the election results no matter who wins. That is democracy.
They don't have to for the same reason the CEO of Walmart doesn't have to tell its truck driver to rear end someone for Walmart to be liable if its truck driver rear ends someone.
I have not personally seen the discovery responses in the case. However, they are quoted in numerous media outlets. A simple Google search will show them. Does that mean I believe everything I see in them media? No, but if the defendants just paid almost $800M to settle a lawsuit in light of the discovery responses, I presume that they're legitimate.
No Democrat on my lifetime has won fair and square, because the media has always carried their water and let them deceive without challenging them. In fact, they largely reinforce their deceptions. It started during the New Deal and has only gotten more brazen over the years, and at this point, it's basically a joke. Is the New York Times really less partisan than Pravda or the Völkischer Beobachter? Not much.
Do I trust voting by mail? No. Would it be easy to cheat in big numbers? No. Would it be easy to cheat in small numbers (close elections)? Yes. And if cheating occurred, it would be extremely hard to catch. Ballot harvesting only aggravates that problem.
But none of that is the same as rigged machines, which is the claim at issue in the lawsuit.
Well, when you have a judge that basically handed the decision to Dominion you're pretty much forced to settle. This wasn't exactly handed fairly.
I’m sure all attorneys on WM experience it on a regular basis, but I once got to read emails, texts and instant messages on a healthcare case as an expert witness. It involved a company I previously worked for and I knew many of the people writing those messages. I could not believe how stupid people could be and I could not believe I was being paid to read it.
Again, I need more information to judge that. For example, you think the machines should have been inspected. Maybe so, but I can think of a plausible scenario in which that wouldn't be correct.
For example, is Fox standing by the defamatory statements and claiming them to be truthful? If they are, then yes, I'd say it's unfair to deny them at least some kind of access to the machines, and that's something that could likely be cured by an appellate court. I wouldn't just write out a $700M+ check without pushing the matter further. I'd appeal the ruling first.
However, if Fox isn't claiming the statements to be true, then Dominion is going to be able to argue pretty solidly that the machines are outside the scope of discovery on the basis of relevance and trade secrets.
I'd have to see Fox's pleadings to make that call.
It's beyond the discovery. The judge had no business putting his opinion in to whether Fox lied or not. That's the jury's job. He poisoned the well. He said everything Fox said was a lie which is absolutely not true.
This is what Fox showed the court. This is NOT a lie. Even Dominion admitted themselves the machines are effed up. HUGE: FOX News Filing Shows DOMINION Voting Systems Executives Including Eric Coomer Knew Its Voting Systems Had Major Security Issues, Was Hacked, and Was "Riddled with Bugs" | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
Thanks Mona, the shows of his my wife got me to watch were jaw droppers. Like Beck, Kelly, and O’Rielly (and someone else I cannot remember) I saw a few of their shows which made me comment they better have a security detail. They were all canned - yeah I know O’Reilly included other reasons but you can only buck the system so much. Like I contend we are on the precipice- maybe beyond.
Horn2RunAgain
2,500+ Posts
Reduces viewership. Tremendously
Horn2RunAgain
2,500+ Posts
Saw and heard megyn Kelly's podcast last night with Victor d Hansen. She called ******** on this. Until sources become public I'll agree with her
He got more votes than Trump and will get even more votes in 2024 if Trump runs due to the constant beating Trump gets from the media and the political elite.
All we can hope for is somehow holding the House and taking the Senate. Otherwise, the country will be lost.
Weekly Prediction Contest
* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC
Recent Threads
-
The Media Industry
- Started by texas_ex2000
- Replies: 8K
- West Mall
-
President Biden Accountability Thread
- Started by 2003TexasGrad
- Replies: 4K
- West Mall
Prediction Results Threads
