Walker Doubles Down on WOW

And yet you take the effort to tell me that you have answered.

Evidently a cut-and-paste takes too much work?

I've read some of your above responses, and they didn't seem to be on point. You may think they are, but they aren't.
 
If that works for you, go with it,
cool.gif
 
Meanwhile, the war rages on:

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women
1) Republicans not only want to reduce women's access to abortion care, they're actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven't yet. Shocker.
2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to "accuser." But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain "victims."
3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)
4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.
5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids' preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.
8) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.
9) Congress just voted for a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.
10) And if that wasn't enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can't make this stuff up).The Link
 
Since satchel has moved on to other made-up stuff, I guess that means he's given up ducking and dodging his other made-up claims that have been refuted.

Oddly enough, a move-on list claiming second-or third-hand knowledge of a bill making it legal to kill an abortion provider is going to require some actual verification. I know in your world conservatives would rather kill a liberal than spit on him, but among the "normals" out here in the non-imaginary world, i think you'll have a hard time showing that more than a handful of whackos believe or support that.
 
I could be totally talking out my a$$ here, because I'm relying entirely on personal experience, not research. However, here's something that could account for women making less than men. In every job I've ever had, women missed work and called in sick FAR more often than men did and left earlier in the day (whether they had kids at home or not). If my experience is common, it has to affect their pay, and frankly, it should.

In every office I've worked in, the women would call in sick every few weeks and for stupid $hit that a man could never get away with - like a headache. The men would call in sick about once or twice per year, and usually it was for stuff like the flu or something that was contagious and would truly impact his working ability. (Of course, if a female coworker got the flu, she'd be out for a week. A guy would be out for a day or two.) In addition, the offices would be half men half women during the day but would be a sausage fest after about 5:15 at night.

Again, that's just my experience. The offices I've worked in during the course of my life might have all just been weird.
 
And still no addresses to the actual discussion at hand, just finger pointing and posting of a list of unattributed actions that may or may not have happened. And many of them are instances of an individual proposing something - no word on whether they actually had any support. Again, satchel and perham use the Moveon tactic of finding a fringe crazy (or selectively editing that person's comment to make it LOOK crazy) and try to convince everyone that their strawman is mainstream conservative thought.

We already know satchel is on board with the idea of editing comments to make them look incriminating, so why would this tactic be out of character for him?
 
Anyone care to wager a $5 bet? satchel has:

10:1 - zero affiliation with The University of Texas
6:1 - he knew or knows alumni
4:1 never married (teaser @ 3x odds never in a serious monogamous relationship with a female for >3 years
2:1 quasi-ag or sec sec sec troll
1:1 trusts no caucasians
2:5 believes white man is the devil with sole intent of eliminating blacks
5:2 believes white man is intent to keep blacks from equal opportunity
1:9 he regularly uses derogatory racist names for any non-black minority (10x odds teaser - he believes other non-black minorities should be expelled from US back to their homeland)

I've got PayPal..place your wagers! Handicappers avail w/links!
 
So you think that legalizing the murd of abortion providers is not unusual for the GOP, or the idea that if the choice is to let a woman die or abort her child, the GOP sides with saving the child at the expense of the mother's life?

Again, this kind of idiocy explains why we can't have honest debate in this country anymore. If I truly believe that my opponent doesn't care if a pregnant mother lives or dies, or that I should be able to legally kill an abortion provider, then there's really not a lot of common ground worth discussing.

So it is now safe for me to say that the idea that old people can only connect with society by receiving junk mail is not out of the mainstream of liberal thought?
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. The Chiefs and that Swift gal. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top