Twitter

Twitter suspended yet another vocal pro-Trump leader

CuCVrwaWYAEwbqy.jpg
 
Now Twitter has blocked James O'Keefe

This just after he posted some material on vote corruption --

"..... On Tuesday, O’Keefe released a video which shows Manhattan Democratic Election Commissioner Alan Schulkin admitting that voter fraud does indeed exist.

On Wednesday, O’Keefe released a video which shows a male Hillary Clinton staffer stating: “To be fired I would have to grab Emma’s [female coworker] *** twice and she would have to complain about it, I would have to sexually harass someone.”

The second video also showed the campaign worker stating that he could rip up Republican voter registration forms and not be reprimanded....."



In addition, he was about to post something on a sitting US Senator --

james-okeefe-locked-out-575x335.jpg
 
That's disgusting stuff, Joe Fan.
No doubt Twitter shares the same liberal bias as most of the MSM.
Have the accounts of Vaughn & O'Keefe been unlocked?
 
That's disgusting stuff, Joe Fan.....


Check out their latest #hashtag \/
The left is openly advocating violence
And Twitter, which is otherwise banning Trump voters right and left, dont care

disruptj20.jpg
 
Last edited:
....
Have the accounts of Vaughn & O'Keefe been unlocked?

O'Keefe keeps popping up under different user names, which get banned as quickly as Twitter finds him
I think Vaughn may have finally given up, just like Milo did
Others are now voluntarily leaving -- for example James Woods (he of the genius IQ level) left last night
 
So, we don't know why he was suspended in the first place. That's a key datapoint before grabbing our collective pitchforks.

Twitter's written rules are not so much the issue.
Twitter's inconsistent and biased enforcement of its rules is.

As should be obvious to everyone by now.
 
More than one poster here told us this does not happen
Where are they now?


CxgdQKzW8AAHaBP.jpg:large

Human error? There are literally an army of moderators in cool places like Manila that have on average 7 seconds to make a decision. Yes, that's the Facebook moderator metric for how long an Accenture resource has to determine whether it meets or doesn't meet their guidelines. It's reported that Accenture literally employs 4k people to moderate Facebook for d!ck pics, racism and the like. Twitter does the same albeit with a different vendor. So, could the 4k people interpret the policy different or do they even have time to look for the full context?
 
Apparently this is also thing now .....

Same folks always lecturing the country about the benefits of diversity

CxoKxasXgAAcwYc.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's too bad Twitter seems to be pursuing a political agenda.

I opened an account recently. Twitter's list of suggested people to follow was telling. Numero uno, Hillary PR team.
 
So, the twitter hashtag #NeverRomney began to trend today
Twitter removed it
Which I guess means they support Romney for SOS
Which is probably enough grounds to oppose him
If twitter likes someone, it usually not a good sign


 
Last edited:
"Silicon Valley corporations blew millions on presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That was a bad investment. It’s even worse for the actual employees, nearly all of whom donated — if they donated — to Clinton, and not to Trump.

“Out of over 15,000 Facebook employees, only six gave to Donald Trump’s campaign over the entire course of the 18-month campaign.”

“Out of a whopping 115,000 Apple employees, a measly 24 donated to Trump. That’s 0.02% of their workforce.”
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top