Wow, sounds like the lib media and their "unbiased" polls knew exactly what was going to happen here. How did they know R turnout was going to be lower than 2008 and D turnout would also be down, but that the D sample would end up being +7 again. That is impressive. All the explanations I saw were relectantly predicting an increased R turnout, but that the Ds would match it, enough so that D samples would stay at 08 levels.
Link to these articles predicting the drop in turnout from both parties? Because I never saw anything of the kind. Of course, I keep myself buried in wingnut news sources.