SLEEPLESS in SEATTLE

OUBubba said:

Sadly, it takes a year for the truth to show you and yours dishonest. But the gaslighting will continue.
Click to expand...


"The curfew, violence of past nights, chaos created by federal defendants, discharge of tear gas in that direction was not unreasonable," attorney Richard Sobiecki, representing MPD, said.

Sobiecki added that because its officers “did not target specific protesters,” their constitutional rights were not violated."

"Protesters also reported seeing DC Police firing tear gas in their direction closer to 17th and H while fleeing federal police tear gas"

No one was targeted, buddy. They targeted areas to disperse the crowd to get it to move. Let me remind you the night before these "peaceful protestors" tried to get to the president. We had to get them to move and out of there before night. Gaslighted? Dude, you still think Trump was defending the racists at Charlottesville. You made a damn fool of yourself during the Russian Collusion nonsense.

Pretty pathetic, dude to try bring up something from a year ago in order to try to prove you're right. Perhaps I should do it to you.
 
Last edited:
Tell that to the Australian journalists who were assaulted and the church staff.

The point is, I said they tear gassed protesters last year. You said that was a lie. That they only used some other lesser offensive gas. This points that I was correct and you were full of Aggy dog poop. Also, this was a for a plucking photo op with a bible.
 
OUBubba said:
Tell that to the Australian journalists who were assaulted and the church staff.

The point is, I said they tear gassed protesters last year. You said that was a lie. That they only used some other lesser offensive gas. This points that I was correct and you were full of Aggy dog poop. Also, this was a for a plucking photo op with a bible.
Click to expand...
 
OUBubba said:
Tell that to the Australian journalists who were assaulted and the church staff.

The point is, I said they tear gassed protesters last year. You said that was a lie. That they only used some other lesser offensive gas. This points that I was correct and you were full of Aggy dog poop. Also, this was a for a plucking photo op with a bible.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between areas being gassed to make people move than being targeted. They set up areas to be gassed. If you moved into that area after being gassed that was your fault. NO ONE WAS INTENTIONALLY GASSED. If you can't see the difference then I can't help you.

Now I will rescind my statement if the lawyer is not telling the complete truth on this.
 
OUBubba said:
Tell that to the Australian journalists who were assaulted and the church staff.

The point is, I said they tear gassed protesters last year. You said that was a lie. That they only used some other lesser offensive gas. This points that I was correct and you were full of Aggy dog poop. Also, this was a for a plucking photo op with a bible.
Click to expand...
You are a confused individual with a serious case of TDS. Saving the church and clearing the Square were two different events.
 
How pathetic can you be to bring up a quote from a year ago to try to prove how right you are? I thought that **** died with LongestHorn.

Only time I recall doing that is when people tell me that they didn't say something and I go back to prove it.
 
Last edited:
OUBubba said:
Tell that to the Australian journalists who were assaulted and the church staff.

The point is, I said they tear gassed protesters last year. You said that was a lie. That they only used some other lesser offensive gas. This points that I was correct and you were full of Aggy dog poop. Also, this was a for a plucking photo op with a bible.
Click to expand...

No, I said, "Bubba, only one canister was launched by one officer at a few people who attacked the officer"

There was teargassing on tape to establish perimeters and move people. We all saw that on TV. This news station is acting like they discovered something new. There was only one case that we know of where people were deliberately attacked by an officer.

What you see as attacking and what I see as attacking is not the same it seems.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
How pathetic can you be to bring up a quote from a year ago to try to prove how right you are? I thought that **** died with LongestHorn.

Only time I recall doing that is when people tell me that they didn't say something and I go back to prove it.
Click to expand...
It was in my Twitter feed today. Blame it on the people who lied for a year.

“one canister” by accident is not the equivalent of the police admitting to using tear gas on “protesters”. They also got the media and the church staff. But, hey, cool photo.
 
Last edited:
That was the night before. I think only one of us has listened to the interview of the bishop of the church who was among those tear gassed away from the church for the photo opp.
 
The area was cleared because intelligence said another attack that night was coming along with the curfew coming ahead, not because of a photo op. The night before was complete chaos and a situation much worse than the so-called Insurrection. It was so bad that the President of the USA had to go into a bunker and the media thought that was hilarious.

The fact that a church is going along with the stupid MSM narrative of a photo op makes me not take anything they say seriously. Yes, I'm sure some gas was in the air but nobody was attacked with a canister at the church.

If we hadn't cleared the streets the domestic terrorists probably would have struck again.

Yes, the cops were rough with the crowd. The day before many were hurt with various thrown objects and dozens of Secret Service people were hurt as well. They weren't playing around. When they say to move it's not a request.
 
Last edited:
Bull. There was a curfew that was starting a few hours later. Had this happened after curfew I could agree. This was 100% church photo op by the poon grabber with 5 kids from 3 women. You and yours ability to look passed this behavior and then embracing it is what is going to destroy this country.
 
OUBubba said:
Bull. There was a curfew that was starting a few hours later. Had this happened after curfew I could agree. This was 100% church photo op by the poon grabber with 5 kids from 3 women. You and yours ability to look passed this behavior and then embracing it is what is going to destroy this country.
Click to expand...

What? They weren't going to wait until after curfew when it's close to dark. That's ridiculous. The whole purpose is to stop it before it starts. People like me are not going to destroy this country. What's going to destroy this country are people like yourself who are not independent thinkers and go along with MSM groupthink. The cultural rot that you libs embrace as enlightened thinking is mind blowing and is crippling this country.
 
OUBubba said:
All things being equal, maybe the word of the a bishop of the diocese should trump you and me. DC Episcopal bishop: 'I am outraged' by Trump church visit

you guys allowed urinating all over the blue line on 1/6. What line is this that you give no f’s for?
Click to expand...

That's her uninformed opinion. The MSM found a useful idiot to parrot the narrative. Of course you'll believe any kind of hokey nonsense as long as it's anti-Trump. The night before these "peaceful" protestors were burning DC to the ground. The fact is that we were trying to stop Part 2 from happening and you eagerly accept the narrative that Trump did all of that for a photo op.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
That's her uninformed opinion. The MSM found a useful idiot to parrot the narrative. Of course you'll believe any kind of hokey nonsense as long as it's anti-Trump. The night before these "peaceful" protestors were burning DC to the ground. The fact is that we were trying to stop Part 2 from happening and you eagerly accept the narrative that Trump did all of that for a photo op.
Click to expand...
Uninformed. SHE WAS THERE!!!!!!! She said that they used tear gas as well. You’re lost.
 
OUBubba said:
Uninformed. SHE WAS THERE!!!!!!! She said that they used tear gas as well. You’re lost.
Click to expand...

I don't care if she was there. She's parroting the MSM and for a woman of God she has a lot of hate in her heart for a man she doesn't know.

"In no way do we support the President's incendiary response to a wounded, grieving nation,"

This is garbage. We had the president go into a bunker because of these domestic terrorists but Trump is the problem. She's a kook.
 
Horn2RunAgain said:
I read her comments about POTUS in the link. Pure regurgitated rhetoric. You heard those same words 10x a day on CNN, MSNBC until ~2 months ago
Click to expand...
I’d give you that if she weren’t on the church grounds when she was tear gassed hours before the curfew. Her real life experience trumps anything else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top