The student never punched the video. That is what I meant about being dishonest. He simply didn't hit the VP.
When the VP grabs the kid and throws him into a wall hitting his head, that is an attack. He can restrain the student from leaving the room, but you are justifying disproportionate violence against a student who posed no threat at all to the VP.
Yes. The report filed did not mention the bad parts of the video and then the SI and Weir of the school board have protected the VP from any accountability.
If the student was thrown into the room and landed perfectly in the center, you'd change your complaint from "throws him into a wall hitting his head" to something like "throws him to the floor." A VP can restrain a student from leaving a room but not put the student back in the room? Change the word "teacher" to "cop" in your points here and previously, and you'd fit right in with the Black Lives Matter crowd.
I agree, but the relationship is different. At least generally, the student is subordinate to the teacher. A constituent is never subordinate to an elected official. You're supposed to be respectful to a constituent and approach them in good faith, even if they're wrong. They are the taxpayers and the voters. They are the boss and are supposed to be treated as such.
You're right, and I think we're all agreeing with you on the treatment of school board to citizen.