Bipartisan efforts to raise wall in Yuma pays off. 90% of illegal immigration stopped in area. Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those who come by visa are higher skilled.A wall at least can increase the barrier to entry sufficiently for most cases crossing border on foot.
However, most illegals are in the US due to expired Visas. If you want to make the biggest effect, you have to implement e-verify and arrest an employer or two.
Those who come by visa are higher skilled.
This wouldn't be a bad deal for Uncle Sam if it was just for this caravan. Migrants demand let us in or give us $50,000. The only problem is 150 million migrants would start hitching up their wagons and heading for the promise land.
Caravan asylum seekers tell U.S.: Let us in or give us $50,000 each to go home
But Vol, they are just honest hardworking people who will not take a dime of benefits from the taxpayer and will contribute billions.
Not buying that one?
Ok How about it is for the children?
They come with any many kinds of Visas (tourist, temp work, student). A high skilled person working under a Visa will have incentive to keep it valid. For high skilled jobs i don't think employers typically let that slide.
Yep. To further your point one of the caravans was willing to take bribes to go back home tells me this group wasn't about the American dream. They were here to milk the U.S. taxpayer.
I am sure the H1B visas are abused faked and frauded.
We should demand scrutiny and punishment.
No abuse of our generous policies should be allowed to continue.
EVER
That said I doubt the Indian H1b abusers are raping the welfare system
OR demanding reparations.
Or they were so desperate that the "bribe" was so consequential to their life that waiting to get into the US with what is being relayed as a hostile amnesty application process wasn't a worth option. Hey...celebrate the fact that the bribe worked.
The Supreme Court on Friday refused a request from the Trump administration to restore newly implemented restrictions that would prevent some migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from applying for asylum.
In documents first reported by BuzzFeed News, the court denied a motion from the Justice Department following a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this month that rejected the Trump administration's efforts to delay a judge's order blocking the new asylum policy.
The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security jointly issued the rule in November and said it sought to tamp down what the Trump administration called "meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources."
Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar sided with the rule's opponents, temporarily blocking the order's provisions applying to immigrants suspected to have crossed the border illegally.
The decision was a narrow 5-4 ruling, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court's more liberal justices against the administration's request for a stay.
The 9th got it right. I'm not surprised they got affirmed.
So as we discussed; form a line and vet them one by one. The final result may be as Trump expected and tried to mass reject but the law isn't written that way.
They can do that by securing the border and simply not permitting illegal entry. However, the executive order is a product of stupid people making bad decisions. That's how even the Ninth Circuit can be made to look sensible.
Yes, the Nazis set up the the Berlin Wall, formally known as the Anti-Fascist Protection Rampart. Makes sense.
Stephen Miller?
Miller is a single issue guy. Hard to imagine him being that stupid. I also can't imagine a White House counsel being that stupid. It's one of two things. It could be Trump directly forcing the issue and ignoring what everybody around him says. He is stupid enough to do it. It could also be the work of others with knowledge that it would get invalidated in court but decided to push it anyway because it would give Trump an opportunity use to judge-bash and amp up the base.
You're acting like this was so outrageous to try to do. There was only a need for one more conservative judge to get this passed. Before you yell "conservative activism" some of the conservative judges on the SC were doing law before you were born and know it quite well . Of course you're not the only lawyer that I've met that thinks their interpretation is the one and true way. About all of you do that.
I'm not really interpreting it. That isn't necessary. The liberal judges didn't have to pull some nutty doctrine out of their asses to strike e EO down. Basically, they just had to know how to read. The law was pretty clear.
And to be clear, I'm not saying I know more than the conservative justices any more than I know more than the liberal justices do when they butcher the law. I'm saying that they're abusing their judicial power. They're letting their policy and political preferences drive their jurisprudence to an extreme degree at the expense and diminishment of the written law. In other words, they're behaving like liberal judges, but they're not stupid. They know what their doing.
I'm not really interpreting it. That isn't necessary. The liberal judges didn't have to pull some nutty doctrine out of their asses to strike e EO down. Basically, they just had to know how to read. The law was pretty clear.
And to be clear, I'm not saying I know more than the conservative justices any more than I know more than the liberal justices do when they butcher the law. I'm saying that they're abusing their judicial power. They're letting their policy and political preferences drive their jurisprudence to an extreme degree at the expense and diminishment of the written law. In other words, they're behaving like liberal judges, but they're not stupid. They know what their doing.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC