accuratehorn
10,000+ Posts
re: calling an act terrorism-every "terrorist" thinks what he is doing is right, either from his religious, moral, or ethical perspective, and there are going to be those who agree the act was right to combat a perceived evil.
There probably should not be any acts called terrorism, just call them crimes and leave it at that.
Sure, lots of people dislike the IRS, and have found some policies or rulings to be unfair, and either inwardly or publically agree with the airplane crasher.
I agree that redwood trees should not be cut down, and people shouldn't build in the middle of national forests, and there are those who spike the trees and burn down those houses. Some people call them environmental terrorists.
These things are just crimes, plain and simple. Either work within the system to change policies, or become a criminal and attack it from the outside. Same for al Queda, Taliban, Timothy McVea, Unibomber or the Austin IRS Bomber.
They're either all terrorists, or they are all criminals. They all do the same things. It's a matter of semantics.
There probably should not be any acts called terrorism, just call them crimes and leave it at that.
Sure, lots of people dislike the IRS, and have found some policies or rulings to be unfair, and either inwardly or publically agree with the airplane crasher.
I agree that redwood trees should not be cut down, and people shouldn't build in the middle of national forests, and there are those who spike the trees and burn down those houses. Some people call them environmental terrorists.
These things are just crimes, plain and simple. Either work within the system to change policies, or become a criminal and attack it from the outside. Same for al Queda, Taliban, Timothy McVea, Unibomber or the Austin IRS Bomber.
They're either all terrorists, or they are all criminals. They all do the same things. It's a matter of semantics.