ISIS produces nothing. They obtain their strength by theft and contributions from supporting state actors, particularly Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Gulf States characterized as US allies.
The key to defeating them is to cut off their finances and access to weapons. The US and probably France and other European countries sell billions of dollars worth of weapons to Islamic states (allies) which foment radical ideology. Much of this eventually gets transferred to radical organizations such as Al Qaeda or ISIS.
Libya and Syria are textbook examples. The US is so obsessed with defeating Russia, weakening Russia's allies, and controlling the resources within the region, that we funded Muslims to overthrow each government. In both cases, the blowback resulted in strengthening radical Islamists and forcing the US to dedicate military resources to foreign entanglements for the long term, whatever that turns out to be.
In Syria, the goal is to oust Assad so that a gas pipeline can flow through Syria, thus enriching countries like Qatar and weaken Russia.
In Libya, China's oil interests were given up and the dollar will continue to be the currency of exchange.
The US interests have nothing to do with radical Islam. Radical Islam is more or less a tool the US uses in order to try to achieve objectives related to empire. Whether or not these objectives are achieved, we wind up dealing with the blowback of dealing with what we helped to create.