NJlonghorn
2,500+ Posts
Looking at the above list of President Obama's accomlishments, I'd say it is a mixed bag of successes and failures.
As I look back on President Obama's 4 years (almost) in office, I ask myself the standard question -- Are we better off than we were 4 years ago? The answer is unequivocally yes. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to review some newspapers from the fall of 2008. President Obama came into the office with the economy in total shambles. He (together with President Bush before him) managed to avert a total meltdown.
But are we AS MUCH better off as we should be? I don't think so. Over the last 2-3 years, the economy has pretty much sputtered along, not getting much better but not getting much worse, either.
It's hard to say whether the slow recovery is President Obama's fault, President Bush's fault, Congress's fault, the Fed's fault, Europe's fault, Asia's fault, the Middle East's fault, or just plain unavoidable. Probably a combination of all of the above.
To me, this election is less about President Obama than it is about Governor Romney. I don't think Obama is the right person to lead the country, but my gut tells me that Romney would be worse. And his choice of Ryan as Veep has made me more certain of that.
What pushed me from the undecided camp to the Obama camp was President Clinton's point. The economic near-meltdown came from policies that Romney seeks to reestablish. Trickle-down economics doesn't work -- never has, never will. Allowing the rich to accumulate more and more wealth won't fix our economy -- it will break us. We can't afford to go back there, so I'm planning to hold my nose and vote Obama.
As I look back on President Obama's 4 years (almost) in office, I ask myself the standard question -- Are we better off than we were 4 years ago? The answer is unequivocally yes. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to review some newspapers from the fall of 2008. President Obama came into the office with the economy in total shambles. He (together with President Bush before him) managed to avert a total meltdown.
But are we AS MUCH better off as we should be? I don't think so. Over the last 2-3 years, the economy has pretty much sputtered along, not getting much better but not getting much worse, either.
It's hard to say whether the slow recovery is President Obama's fault, President Bush's fault, Congress's fault, the Fed's fault, Europe's fault, Asia's fault, the Middle East's fault, or just plain unavoidable. Probably a combination of all of the above.
To me, this election is less about President Obama than it is about Governor Romney. I don't think Obama is the right person to lead the country, but my gut tells me that Romney would be worse. And his choice of Ryan as Veep has made me more certain of that.
What pushed me from the undecided camp to the Obama camp was President Clinton's point. The economic near-meltdown came from policies that Romney seeks to reestablish. Trickle-down economics doesn't work -- never has, never will. Allowing the rich to accumulate more and more wealth won't fix our economy -- it will break us. We can't afford to go back there, so I'm planning to hold my nose and vote Obama.