Obama Trumps Trump

[PhantomHorn]

There was no reason why the President of the U.S. should of been invited to the royal wedding. It was not an official state event since William is not a direct heir to the throne. Charles holds that title.

 

[UTDude]

Let's see if this makes any sense to you:

SCORE

Trump speaks negatively of Obama:

Trump - 0
Obama - 1

Obama speaks negatively of Trump:

Trump -1
Obama - 1

Trump is tied with The President of the United States.

Who just won?

Maybe that was way over your head.

 

[TexasGolf]

In reply to:

---

 

[general35]

tells the country that our President is a liar about being born in Africa- and you think he shouldn't expect to make himself a target??
__________________________________________________

i dont think trump ever called the president a liar. i think he just asked him to release his original birth certificate. it's a stupid sideshow but every cable news program was more than happy to put trump on the air. trump's point about obama's grades is more relevant only because it addresses the issue of competence. however, its a non-issue as well because he has already been elected. it should have been an issue before the election. bush's competence and intelligence was always considered an issue for debate and scrutiny. was that racist? in some cases it doesnt matter and it might not have mattered. we all knew bush's grades and history and we elected him. we all knew his partying ways, business dealings, militarycareer, both real and forged. im of the opinion that if you are going to elect someone and allow them to have their finger on the button, EVERYTHING about them is relevant... their past writings, opinions, family, friends, associations, etc. i watched a 20/20 episode on romney prior to the last election which addressed his family and religion. the reporter tried to paint the religion as cooky. it is imo, but so what. obama never went under that kind of scrutiny for his church, for his union connections, for his business dealings etc. you might see an article here or there but they were primarily local. he gave great speeches and charmed the press, that is pretty much what we got out of his vetting process. his supporters would claim he was vetted. i disagree. nobody dug through his garbage. it was all quite funny. even SNL did multiple bits on it but that was only because Tina Fey was a huge hillary supporter.

 

[TexasGolf]

general speaks truth

 

[Oilfield]

Spot on, General. You can bet that whoever the R nominee is will basically get an upper and lower GI from the media to the point where they will either lose, drop out, or be personally destroyed for life. If this person should survive the scrutiny you can bet they would likely be one the most qualified persons ever to serve as POTUS.

 

[Satchel]

The liberal media could get a head start by identifying the preacher/pastors of the leading candidates and comb through their sermons for incendiary sound bytes.

 

[Oilfield]

He didn't hear them.

 

[YoLaDu]

i remember whining about the MSM when George W Bush won in 2004. Good times.

It made me feel better i guess. I never thought to blame John Kerry for not winning. Never thought to credit George Bush for running an effective campaign.

It was definitely the complicit media for things not happening the way i wanted them to. Stupid media's fault. makes perfect sense.

 

[HornBud]