Not even Spicer will defend this claim....

OUBubba said:
Your solid feedback to me continues. Keep up the good work!

If you've voted in Oklahoma in the last few years there's no way to see a dead person get through that gauntlet.
Click to expand...
Bubba, the idea is to remove dead people, and people no longer residences of any particular State, from the voting rolls. There should be no complaint about doing so. This would not hurt in the effort to curb voter fraud, and there is no legitimate argument against doing so.
 
iatrogenic said:
Bubba, the idea is to remove dead people, and people no longer residences of any particular State, from the voting rolls. There should be no complaint about doing so. This would not hurt in the effort to curb voter fraud, and there is no legitimate argument against doing so.
Click to expand...
I'm supportive of removing dead people from the rolls. I changed my address on my DL and they automatically disenrolled me. I had to go re-register to vote. Seems a little aggressive.
 
OUBubba said:
I'm supportive of removing dead people from the rolls. I changed my address on my DL and they automatically disenrolled me. I had to go re-register to vote. Seems a little aggressive.
Click to expand...

Barry, I have to register every year. It isn't that big of a deal.
 
Joe Fan said:
Democrats in these states will fight every attempt to clean up the voter rolls, as they always have. Whether its the dead or the non-citizens or the multiple voters.

If they asked me, I would say, let us start with California and Illinois. But there will be tremendous resistance in those two states. The power of the Dems there is like they had in the Jim Crow South. Keeping the names of the dead on the rolls will be considered a victory against Trump for these people. This is how they think.

Will Voting Equality! be the Civil Rights cry for the rest of this decade?
Click to expand...

I'm guessing Tammany Hall is now the DNC.
 
I would prefer internet voting that is linked to a camera shot of your face. With face recognition technology presence can be verified.
 
Monahorns said:
I would prefer internet voting that is linked to a camera shot of your face. With face recognition technology presence can be verified.
Click to expand...

When I first read the top sentence I saw "a camera that will shoot you in the face if you cheat." I was thinking how bold you are
 
Last edited:
Monahorns said:
mchammer, are you saying there are over 100,000 now?
Click to expand...
No. The tweet is from May, 2020 but the tweeter is referencing a 2019 article that has been challenged. To the casual user, the tweeter is making it appear this is current information. This is false.
 
mchammer said:
No. The tweet is from May, 2020 but the tweeter is referencing a 2019 article that has been challenged. To the casual user, the tweeter is making it appear this is current information. This is false.
Click to expand...

It’s a good thing that there’s not a statue of limitations for articles to be posted from 6 months ago.
 
mchammer said:
No. The tweet is from May, 2020 but the tweeter is referencing a 2019 article that has been challenged. To the casual user, the tweeter is making it appear this is current information. This is false.
Click to expand...


Doesn't have to be right now for it to be relative to the discussion. We Americans need to decide the direction of our country not a bunch foreigners. 300 million US citizens and we generally only get a small fraction of those voting in major elections and much less voting in the minor ones.

This whole thing reminds me of the scene from the movie Gangs of New York where there was so much voter fraud they had more votes than citizens and had to stop because they ran out of ballots. We don't need that, we need a secure count and no way should we let the left dictate the terms of the fight.

We will lose way too much if that happens. Our constitution will become meaning less, unless you are a member of the communist party errrrr the Democrat party.
 
mchammer said:
Wasn’t this article heavily disputed when it was printed? I don’t know what was the final resolution but for the tweeter to omit this is a lie of omission.
Click to expand...

What was the final purge?
And why do they always resist purging the voter rolls of the dead?
I suggest there is only one reason
 
Joe Fan said:
What was the final purge?
And why do they always resist purging the voter rolls of the dead?
I suggest there is only one reason
Click to expand...

The final purge got it down to about 60,000 if my memory serves me.. After that the lawyers came in and threatened to sue Texas if they decided to try to take any people off the rolls. That was the end of it right there.
 
Last edited:
mchammer said:
It’s a tough job monitoring the internet. I would like to see you do it, Mr smart guy.
Click to expand...

It’s new when people hear it for the first time. So much fake news that the real stuff doesn’t get heard. Unfortunately the people that would monitor the internet would be the people that allows fake news and blocks the real stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top