well bierce...it sounds like neither of us contradicted each other then and we both told the truth. i still think the point i made is far more signficant as all you actually said was that some parts of the Anarctica are losing mass....to which my reply is "who cares?"
i suspect the polar caps are always going through such flux to the point where SOMEWHERE they are losing mass and SOMEWHERE they are gaining some....the more important question (imo) is what is happening overall? overall antarctica is GAINING mass and overall the earth is about even to plus over the past 10 years.
in spite of the bashing i have received i still claim i made some excellent points and a reasonable person may yet come away from this thread unperturbed or frightened by the loss of summer ice in the arctic.
by the way....this, though an opinion piece, makes some excellent points:
editorial
only time will tell, but if the graphs i showed are accurate (and they come from a source that seems to buy AGW, then i am not at all convinced we should be concerned about anything at this point.....
by the way hornpharmd....the only reason i misspelled your name was because i didn't know how to spell it and i was already in the reply and didn't want to go dig it up. i did my best but knew that it was not quite right. no offense meant i assure you.
(of course now i realize, like a buffoon, that i could have just slid the page down since you were the original poster and found your name!)
i suspect the polar caps are always going through such flux to the point where SOMEWHERE they are losing mass and SOMEWHERE they are gaining some....the more important question (imo) is what is happening overall? overall antarctica is GAINING mass and overall the earth is about even to plus over the past 10 years.
in spite of the bashing i have received i still claim i made some excellent points and a reasonable person may yet come away from this thread unperturbed or frightened by the loss of summer ice in the arctic.
by the way....this, though an opinion piece, makes some excellent points:
editorial
only time will tell, but if the graphs i showed are accurate (and they come from a source that seems to buy AGW, then i am not at all convinced we should be concerned about anything at this point.....
by the way hornpharmd....the only reason i misspelled your name was because i didn't know how to spell it and i was already in the reply and didn't want to go dig it up. i did my best but knew that it was not quite right. no offense meant i assure you.
(of course now i realize, like a buffoon, that i could have just slid the page down since you were the original poster and found your name!)