Murdered DNC staffer the Wikileaks Informant?

kudos to Foxnews...they retracted the Seth Rich story after talking incessantly about it for a week to avoid any Trump talk. Carry on.

I guess it is big news when fox has to retract a story because it hardly ever happens. But at least the story they backed off of was not an anonymous source and was actually somebody hired by the family to investigate it. That's usually more than a reliable source. Fox is by far the most trusted news. Can't say that about the fake news that's reported daily by the msm.
 
I guess it is big news when fox has to retract a story because it hardly ever happens. But at least the story they backed off of was not an anonymous source and was actually somebody hired by the family to investigate it. That's usually more than a reliable source. Fox is by far the most trusted news. Can't say that about the fake news that's reported daily by the msm.

Conservative journalists like Max Boot would disagree with you.
 
Husker, you're missing I35's point. The crap the mainstream media is putting out against Trump is on the level of the Seth Rich story. Maybe worse.
 
Husker, you're missing I35's point. The crap the mainstream media is putting out against Trump is on the level of the Seth Rich story. Maybe worse.

I know you believe that regardless of the evidence to the contrary (i.e. actual government sources sworn testimonies that corroborate said stories).
 
I know you believe that regardless of the evidence to the contrary (i.e. actual government sources sworn testimonies that corroborate said stories).

Some stories are true. However, I guess you put your head in the sand when many of these same officials have put an end to the witch hunt stories that the mainstream media have put up over the last few weeks.
 
Some stories are true. However, I guess you put your head in the sand when many of these same officials have put an end to the witch hunt stories that the mainstream media have put up over the last few weeks.

Which "witch hunts" have they put an end to? McCabe said he's not aware of Comey asking for more resources and they would traditionally go to Congress asking for more money.

Let's go back to a link you posted last week.

1. The tape is out there for anyone to listen to. McCarthy says it was a bad joke now vs. the WaPo claiming it was an admission of guilt by Republican leaders. That's not necessarily fake news as McCarthy tries to protect himself and Rep leaders. McCarthy didn't get an invite to the White House recently with Rep leadership showing at best Trump was pissed off at the joke.

2. Deputy Attorney General threatened to quit. Rosenstien denied it. The White House suddenly changed their tune after attributing Comey's firing to Rosenstien's recommendation they did an about face the next day. Do you think Rosenstien was happy? In Senate testimony last week he stated that he knew the decision had been made before drafting his memo and refused to say who asked him to write the memo. Then after the Comey memo he signs the Mueller order then gives the White House 45 minutes to react before publicly announcing it. There is significant smoke here.

3. Covered above.

4. POTUS offered up code-word secret information to the Russians. McMasters initially said the story was false denoting items the initial article never claimed then later simply said what was shared was "wholly appropriate". Thus far, WaPo looks to be accurate.

5. I know nothing about that one.
 
Which "witch hunts" have they put an end to? McCabe said he's not aware of Comey asking for more resources and they would traditionally go to Congress asking for more money.

Let's go back to a link you posted last week.

1. The tape is out there for anyone to listen to. McCarthy says it was a bad joke now vs. the WaPo claiming it was an admission of guilt by Republican leaders. That's not necessarily fake news as McCarthy tries to protect himself and Rep leaders. McCarthy didn't get an invite to the White House recently with Rep leadership showing at best Trump was pissed off at the joke.

2. Deputy Attorney General threatened to quit. Rosenstien denied it. The White House suddenly changed their tune after attributing Comey's firing to Rosenstien's recommendation they did an about face the next day. Do you think Rosenstien was happy? In Senate testimony last week he stated that he knew the decision had been made before drafting his memo and refused to say who asked him to write the memo. Then after the Comey memo he signs the Mueller order then gives the White House 45 minutes to react before publicly announcing it. There is significant smoke here.

3. Covered above.

4. POTUS offered up code-word secret information to the Russians. McMasters initially said the story was false denoting items the initial article never claimed then later simply said what was shared was "wholly appropriate". Thus far, WaPo looks to be accurate.

5. I know nothing about that one.

Good grief. You're stretching reality a bit. What's funny is if all the people involved belonged to the party opposite of what they are the Washington Post/NY Times would be putting out endless Seth Rich stuff and you would be gobbling it up like crazy. I would be here telling you that it's all crap.
 
Good grief. You're stretching reality a bit. What's funny is if all the people involved belonged to the party opposite of what they are the Washington Post/NY Times would be putting out endless Seth Rich stuff and you would be gobbling it up like crazy. I would be here telling you that it's all crap.

You're in so deep that Seth Rich is suddenly "reality". Yes, his murderer should be brought to justice but even his family have disputed the "facts" claiming there is no evidence Rich ever communicated with Wikileaks or Guccifer 2.0. Now even the PI is now claiming that he didn't verify this but rather an "agent" told him this and refuses to disclose the agent. Oh, this PI also once openly claimed that Lesbian gangs with pink pistols were terrorizing communities across the US. So, he didn't exactly start with a credibility surplus. Why the family allowed a Texas businessman (who became a Foxnews contributor) to pay for this PI I have not idea. I guess they were hopeful of getting some justice but clearly their is no desire from the 4Chan and /r/the_donald conspiracy fans for that result.
 
You're in so deep that Seth Rich is suddenly "reality". Yes, his murderer should be brought to justice but even his family have disputed the "facts" claiming there is no evidence Rich ever communicated with Wikileaks or Guccifer 2.0. Now even the PI is now claiming that he didn't verify this but rather an "agent" told him this and refuses to disclose the agent. Oh, this PI also once openly claimed that Lesbian gangs with pink pistols were terrorizing communities across the US. So, he didn't exactly start with a credibility surplus. Why the family allowed a Texas businessman (who became a Foxnews contributor) to pay for this PI I have not idea. I guess they were hopeful of getting some justice but clearly their is no desire from the 4Chan and /r/the_donald conspiracy fans for that result.

I didn't say a thing about Seth Rich being a reality. SHOW ME WHERE I SUPPORTED THIS SILLY CONSPIRACY THEORY!!!! Dude, do you have any reading comprehension skills? You do this **** all the time.
 
I didn't say a thing about Seth Rich being a reality. SHOW ME WHERE I SUPPORTED THIS SILLY CONSPIRACY THEORY!!!! Dude, do you have any reading comprehension skills? You do this **** all the time.

If you aren't among the rabble that is supporting it on this thread then I congratulate you for being more rational than others on this thread. What "reality" are you referring to then? I pointed out the link you posted earlier this week wasn't exactly reality but rather somewhere in the middle on 2 of the topics they called fake news and 2 were flat wrong.
 
Media Matters has gone after Sean Hannity for reporting this case. they published a list of companies advertising on the Hannity show and urged their supporters to contact them and threaten to boycott them if they didn't stop advertising. Amazingly it worked. San Antonio insurance giant USAA withdrew their Hannity ads because 1 member complained. USAA released a tepid statement that their policy in not to advertise on "opinion shows", although they reportedly advertise on opinion shows on CNN and MSNBC.
 
USAA released a tepid statement that their policy in not to advertise on "opinion shows", although they reportedly advertise on opinion shows on CNN and MSNBC.

I'm no Hannity fan or the Rich non-story, but this is a big crock of BS. If that's their policy, then why were they ever advertising on Hannity? His show has been "opinion"-oriented since Day 1.
 
So I guess they've decided they don't mind "opinion shows" anymore

It's a tough time to be a corporation. Now the left and right are playing the boycott game. Like media that has been forced to decide whether to cater to the left or right...companies are being forced to choose too. Eff the extremes.
 


DBRLjBRW0AEhSwQ.jpg

DBRLjBPXkAAWnU_.jpg
 
I think that sort of depends on who you are. More or less like Vince Foster's 'suicide'. I imagine for these purposes that is still an active investigation
 


So there has been a class action lawsuit ongoing for some time filed by Bernie supporters against the DNC. The suit alleges fraud, claiming the DNC and then-chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz worked to undermine Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton.

One of the more amusing bits of infofrmation to leak out is the allegation that Wasserman Schultz made a phone call using voice changer. The fake call was reported to Capital Police.

"...... A court document filed this week with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by their attorneys said that they received a call for information about the case from the office of Wasserman Schultz, a Democratic congresswoman from Florida, and claimed that it sounded like the caller used a voice changer.

According to attorney Elizabeth Lee Beck: "At 4:54 p.m. today [June 1], an individual called our law office from '305-936-5724.'" That number is the contact phone number for Wasserman Schultz's Aventura office in Florida.

"My secretary stated that it sounded like the caller was using a voice changer, because the voice sounded robotic and genderless — along the lines of the voice changers used when television show interviews are kept anonymous," Beck continued. "The caller concluded with 'Okey dokey,' after my secretary gave the caller public information about the case. After the call ended, a simple Google search of the phone number '305-936-5724' shows that it is the phone number for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Aventura office ... What just occurred is highly irregular and we will be filing the instant e-mail with the court forthwith."
http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/56-D.E.-56-Ds-Reply-to-Ps-NOF-Email-6-2-17.pdf
 
If this was just a random murder, it would be solved by now. Maybe they can release OJ so he can look for both killers?
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top