Horns11
10,000+ Posts
There's no doubt Texas football has underperformed for a near decade and a half, 2009 being the last good season. Coaching, and to some extent luck, always plays a part.
Brown was clearly worn out and washed up after the 2009 season, and while 9 win seasons were but a dream during the Charlie Strong Experience, it was clear that that was the top end of what he was going to produce.
CS was just a disaster. He-Man was OK, with flashes of the possibility of something better, followed quickly by a loss. So far Sark hasn't shown much on the field, except for the wondrous beat down of OU last year.
The Alabama game last year, as I said before it was played, was the indicator as to if Sark was going to have early, 2nd year success as good coaches often do, or was at best, a slow and gradual improvement like Mack.
I don't think the Mack era was a "slow and gradual" improvement. It was an overnight one that nearly got us into the CCG in Year One. Not far removed from 66-3. If Derek Dorris doesn't cheap shot Anthony Hicks in Lubbock, we're rematching KSU with a team that was about 9000% better than the one that got beat down by them in September.
Any hire we could have made between 2013 and today (maybe outside of Saban or Swinney or Smart or someone of that tier) would be facing the same scrutiny as Sark. The kind of success that we want isn't really the level we're accustomed to, and that disconnect is an issue at probably 40 college football programs. 10-win seasons aren't supposed to be the norm for any program, but we've been left out of that closed loop of select CFP-ready programs since its birth.
TCU's 2022 season was also a kick in the figurative groin. I honestly do not believe Sonny Dykes will repeat that feat for the rest of his tenure there, but I also think that coaches like Sark can learn a lot from how that team played.