Impeachment

Can you imagine sitting there, every morning, anxiously awaiting the message to arrive that tells you what to say that day?

 
CNN Breaking News: Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, was attacked last night returning to his apartment. DC Police say a witness saw two white Nigerians fleeing the scene shouting "this is MAGA country!" Police have released a grainy still image from security video of the attackers.

EItRJPXU0AEeQO5
 
Last edited:
CNN Breaking News: Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, was attacked last night returning to his apartment. DC Police say a witness saw two white Nigerians fleeing the scene shouting "this is MAGA country!" Police have released a security video image of the attackers.

Did he have a rope around his neck too?
 
People are digging all through his stuff now
Looks like he might have some things in common with Jeffrey Epstein (who did not kill himself)

EIxPcBWW4AEmcio.jpg


Apparently goes to Disneyland all by himself
EIv1r0pXsAEBP2v.jpg


So now this guy in Jan 2017 (the month Trump started his presidency) claimed that this is a coup.


“We will get rid of him (Trump)”. and “the coup would occur in many ways”

Whistleblower Attorney Mark Zaid-


COUP: “a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government”.

So they are attempting to change the 2016 elections of what the American People voted for. This is very serious and is 100% treason.

He is attempting with the crime of betraying our country and attempting to kill our countries sovereignty. But most importantly for his attempt for overthrowing the government.
His actions are the very definition of Treason.
 
The 2016 election was interfered with by democrats. Just look at how Bernie Sanders was screwed by the DNC and CNN.
They failed in all respects, so they then went to illegal tactics to take away the will of the people. Anyone involved in it should be tried for treason.
 
The 2016 election was interfered with by democrats. Just look at how Bernie Sanders was screwed by the DNC and CNN.
They failed in all respects, so they then went to illegal tactics to take away the will of the people. Anyone involved in it should be tried for treason.

And for those that don’t see it that way is just unbelievable. So obvious. There has to be consequences for those that have done this or this will be the new standard that will continue to happen and will destroy our country.
 
Nancy sent this guy out to articulate the Dem case for impeachment
They think this guy is smart and represents them well -- go figure
I thought he might go with "extortion" which is supposed to be their newest theory to "Get Trump" (the Hobbs Act) but I guess, they are abandoning this like seem to have abandoned the "whistleblower"
I wonder what Obama thinks of his claim that replacing an ambassador is an impeachable offense -- or the next Dem President?
 
Nancy sent this guy out to articulate the Dem case for impeachment
They think this guy is smart and represents them well -- go figure
I thought he might go with "extortion" which is supposed to be their newest theory to "Get Trump" (the Hobbs Act) but I guess, they are abandoning this like seem to have abandoned the "whistleblower"
I wonder what Obama thinks of his claim that replacing an ambassador is an impeachable offense -- or the next Dem President?

They hate anyone appointed by Trump until he fires them. Then, they are the most credible and wonderful people to be wronged by the bad orange man.
 
Nancy sent this guy out to articulate the Dem case for impeachment
They think this guy is smart and represents them well -- go figure
I thought he might go with "extortion" which is supposed to be their newest theory to "Get Trump" (the Hobbs Act) but I guess, they are abandoning this like seem to have abandoned the "whistleblower"
I wonder what Obama thinks of his claim that replacing an ambassador is an impeachable offense -- or the next Dem President?


Swalwell, so it’s abuse of power to go after someone politically because you don’t like what he’s doing?

OHHHHH REEEEALLLY?
 
The "whistleblower’s" atty has reversed himself and now says he will not let Eric Ciaramella speak to the Senate Intel Committee

Other attys speculated he is just covering own *** with this move
 
They hate anyone appointed by Trump until he fires them. Then, they are the most credible and wonderful people to be wronged by the bad orange man.
That certainly has been true. Criticizing Trump has been the golden ticket to CNN fame of late.

But that doesn't mean that these people were wrong to criticize Trump. He has earned a lot of that criticism. Is it disingenuous for MSM to only care about them and act they are credible if they criticize Trump...absolutely. But is just as wrong for Trump to love you and praise you on Monday and then call you a scumbag on Friday just because you haven't continued to bow down at the altar of Trump...absolutely.
 
Is there DIRECT EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO? If not it's over. First it was Russian collusion, then a quid pro quo with the Ukraine to investigate a political opponent. All the rest of it is an attempt to confuse voters.
 
Someone interviewed Oleksandr Onyshchenko, formerly of the Ukrainian Parliament and who was deputy chair of Ukraine's top energy oversight committee about the Bidens' activities there, and subsequent coverup of those activities.

He confirmed there were both 'official’ and ‘unofficial’ payments to "the Biden family” from Burisma Holdings, totaling in the millions.

"Onyshchenko also confirmed that former FBI agent Karen Greenaway, who oversaw the Obama administration’s anti-corruption efforts in Eastern Europe, directed the coverup of the Biden scandal at the time, in concert with the U.S. embassy in Kyiv"...

"Onyshchenko confirmed ... that Karen Greenaway pushed Onyshchenko to meet and pressured him to stop talking to the press about Biden corruption..."

BREAKING: Source Reveals Hunter Biden Took 'Off The Books' Payments From Burisma, Aided By FBI Coverup - CD Media
 
Is there DIRECT EVIDENCE OF A QUID PRO QUO? If not it's over. First it was Russian collusion, then a quid pro quo with the Ukraine to investigate a political opponent. All the rest of it is an attempt to confuse voters.

it was over when the Ukrainian leader said he felt no pressure by President Trump and that he didn’t know any funds were being held.


Not sure how many times this has to be said until it sinks in, but if that leader didn’t know that funds were being delayed and he wasn’t told to do something by force or he wouldn’t get those funds, then there isn’t anything more that needs to be said. Well accept to get those SOBs that were lying and doing an attempted coup.
 
Last edited:
I’m still trying to identify an instance where quid pro Quo is not involved when giving a country a billion dollars. Do we just give them money and say, “do what you want with it”?
 
Last edited:

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top