Impeachment
- Thread starter mchammer
- Start date
WM, Switzer is correct. Witnesses were called in 1999. However, the House had already proven its case. We weren't hearing from key witnesses for the first time. They had already testified under oath in other venues. What makes this case unique is that Democrats impeached basically on the basis of accusation. They had virtually no evidence at all and are trying to call relevant witnesses for the first time at the Senate trial. There's no reason why they can't do that, but it's definitely not the norm. Furthermore, it's stupid, because they have no idea what these witnesses are going to say.
Yesterday was the 3rd anniversary of this memorable moment In history. Acting like a 3 year old because mommy won’t buy them a toy.
The thing about this loon and the others is she/it, whatever, actually believed, I think, that temper tantrums like this would cause the election to be reversed. It's as if this would make Trump reconsider or a second election to be held or something.
Such a loser.
They impeached based on hurt feelings. This Ukraine thing started with "Lt. Col." Vindman having his feelings hurt when Trump pulled a Trump and ignored the "talking points" script he wrote for the infamous phone call.
I35
5,000+ Posts
I know right. What did she think would happen making a fool of herself with all the world watching. Who ever took this video ought to be compensated
Funny thing about "her". I thought "she" was a man for about a year.
She does look like a shim.
OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
Dude the call is quid quo pro on the face of it. To say it is not is just an untruth. The emails and testimonies back it up. It's a "drug deal" according to Bolton. And, the whole "she's about to go through some things" in light of what is now known about Lev Parnas and Hyde is kind of scary.
OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
If there are three days of closed door testimonies that Democrats are involved in, yes. I mean they're going to acquit him. He could gun down Rudy on live TV and get off in this senate.
Wrong, dude.
I35
5,000+ Posts
bubba, I think you are the only person in America that actually believes this whole thing is about Trump committing a quid pro quo. All the other Libs know it’s not true but don’t care because they want to get the bad orange man. The people you are defending that’s bringing the clown show doesn’t even believe it. They are just so desperate because they know Trump will be re-elected in 2020.
You are like that Girl that has the cheating boyfriend. Everyone of her friends are telling her that he’s cheating. But she defends him to her friends because he told her he isn’t.
Barry's one of these people that believe his feelings are facts.
OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
I don't think any of them ever put a hold on any aid pending announced investigations into their political rival.
fify
Neither did Trump, so that trend continues.
I35
5,000+ Posts
Check this out, Lebanon was approved funding at the same time as Ukraine and through Dec we still have not given that aid yet. Why aren’t they throwing a fit about that? Because Hunter isn’t getting paid $55k a month through a Lebanon Energy company.
oh and to answer your question. It happens here and there and I know of 5 times it’s happened. But I’d have to look it up because it’s been a little while since I looked.
Mr. D, problem is he and Dems have no REAL evidence.
It's all part of the ongoing show to undermine Trump admin & his re-election campaign. It's a disjointed attempt to project perceived & imagined actions of Trump to chase and attempt to find a High Crime & Misdemeanor.
Last edited:
Monahorns
10,000+ Posts
This claim is the problem. It shows you believe Trump made an impeachable offense based on a level of evidence you are unhappy about. And you want Republicans to provide that evidence to you, even though you already believe confidently that Trump made an impeachable offense based on the evidence that you think is insufficient for a Senate trial.
That is some world class level mentally spiraling down into the abyss. Could this be a mental meth meltdown?
That's what I was thinking. I don't believe the DA has to lay out all his cards to get an indictment. I don't think he is precluded from playing the rest of them and any others he acquires at the trial. If the Senate is the jury then they are not responsible for to bring forth evidence or witnesses. That would be up to the DA (House) and the defense (Trump's attorney's?). It's up to Roberts to make rulings on the evidence and how each set of attorney's conduct the trial.
Or that's how I see it.
To all my little pretties on Hornfans...
I suspect the trial will go Trump's way on a party-line vote assuming no rogues. The real trial will be next November when each of us can vote as we would have had we been on the jury (the Senate). Time will pass quickly and then it will be in our hands. It will no longer be in the hands of our representatives.
We are not corrupt. We are not bought and paid for. We are real.
Aren't we?
I suspect the trial will go Trump's way on a party-line vote assuming no rogues. The real trial will be next November when each of us can vote as we would have had we been on the jury (the Senate). Time will pass quickly and then it will be in our hands. It will no longer be in the hands of our representatives.
We are not corrupt. We are not bought and paid for. We are real.
Aren't we?
If somebody wants to buy me for $50k per month, I must admit I would be tempted. Just putting it out there for all of y'all to consider.
If the icon and power representing your values is a criminal is it so that your values are greater than your representatives character if your values are being adequately protected? Would you not want the opportunity to find someone else who is of clean hands or is the game so ruthless that political power is exempt from the values you hold dear in your own home?
Is that what is meant by render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and concern ourselves with and only with ourselves?
Is that what is meant by render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and concern ourselves with and only with ourselves?
Recent Threads
-
The Media Industry
- Started by texas_ex2000
- Replies: 8K
- West Mall
Prediction Results Threads
