Impeachment

Barry banged his assistant coach's wife. Larry Lacewell. Larry was the guy who spied on Royal's practice and saw Texas putting in a quick kick. Which means he was committed to the cause and truly loyal to Barry.

Barry is one of the worst human beings to exist. Sandusky was worse.
 
I don’t get what I’m seeing. All I just seen was a liar and his videos of past non-sense edited to not see how foolish they looked under cross examination.
 
Stephen Castor, Counsel for the Republicans, in his opening statement just said what I have been saying.

"...they'll try to convince you that the Trump Administration, the same Administration the Democrats regularly accuse of being incompetent, orchestrated an international conspiracy at the highest levels. None of this adds up."

Thank you, Mr. Castor, not that it will matter for libtards. But he's right. How can Trump and his minions be such blundering fools yet organize something they say happened? Mind boggling.
 
Treason is not even a consideration to me. In my opinion, that kind of an accusation is a clear indication of emotional impairment.

If you want to go there, then I'd say the Liberal policy concerning illegal immigrants to be treason. It's much more of a problem to our country in a negative way than zero DIRECT evidence of Trump saying investigate Biden or else I will withhold funds.

I suggest some wine, a sunset and an assessment as to why this means so much to you personally that you are unable to see the real problem, which is blind loyalty to charlatans.
 
Last edited:
Two things.

I have the Barry picture in an ironic way on this site. I did it for Texas week years ago, I think, and I kept it. Barry was a great coach and salesman but a flawed man. He and Lacewell are still friendly, I believe. I'll stay out of their bedroom. All I know is that our HS QB/PG/3rd Baseman was a backup in Norman. His dad was a coach and he was at church every time it was open. He literally did no wrong, ever. He thought highly of Barry and dated his daughter for a bit.

I don't think treason is a big leap. The way that the GOP is now parroting the talking points of Vlad and how many of DJT's actions sync up with what Putin would want is disconcerting. The Ukrainian angle is just a great example. I think a bribe to benefit yourself and potentially damage the interests of your country is treasonous.
 
Nice spin. Clinton perjured himself and obstructed justice in a sexual harassment lawsuit where he was accused of exposing himself to a female subordinate during a job interview. There was no question that he committed a felony. He was held in contempt of court and disbarred. Democrats refused to remove him from office for one reason only - he was a Democrat.
Let's get DJT under oath and see what happens. I think his lawyers call it a perjury trap.
 
Two things.

I have the Barry picture in an ironic way on this site. I did it for Texas week years ago, I think, and I kept it. Barry was a great coach and salesman but a flawed man. He and Lacewell are still friendly, I believe. I'll stay out of their bedroom. All I know is that our HS QB/PG/3rd Baseman was a backup in Norman. His dad was a coach and he was at church every time it was open. He literally did no wrong, ever. He thought highly of Barry and dated his daughter for a bit.

I don't think treason is a big leap. The way that the GOP is now parroting the talking points of Vlad and how many of DJT's actions sync up with what Putin would want is disconcerting. The Ukrainian angle is just a great example. I think a bribe to benefit yourself and potentially damage the interests of your country is treasonous.

1) In this instance, I would think someone who goes to church consistently and forgives a highly flawed man is a good Christian but is possibly compromised by the pathology that strikes so many fan bases concerning college football. Is the forgiveness because of Jesus or victory?

2) I believe 100% that the Liberal policy of enabling illegal immigration to be about political benefit. So what's worse? Their policy or what Trump did (and you can't dodge Biden's clear corruption in getting his loser son a job) without direct evidence?
 
So asking a foreign government to investigate corruption is "Election Interference."
But trying to impeach a president right before an election is not?
 
Accusing Trump of treason is really stupid, Bubba. Be better.

This is it. Treason carries a death penalty. They dont just want 2016 undone, they are so filled with hate they want Trump dead. As Lewandowski said, "They hate Trump more than they love this country."

 
What gets me is the assumption by the Dems that an investigation into Biden, son and VP, would yield no corruption therefore this request for investigation is, in their assertion, such a felonious request. I mean that is the whole thing, their constant ‘debunk’ is BS. So they are assuming because there was nothing to investigate Trump was out of bounds with the request. It’s all much adieu about nothing. Get on with the country’s business.
 
What gets me is the assumption by the Dems that an investigation into Biden, son and VP, would yield no corruption therefore this request for investigation is, in their assertion, such a felonious request. I mean that is the whole thing, their constant ‘debunk’ is BS. So they are assuming because there was nothing to investigate Trump was out of bounds with the request. It’s all much adieu about nothing. Get on with the country’s business.

The word debunk is all over the internet for every accusation I've encountered against the apparently honest (bordering on sainthood and patriotic fervor) Democrats.
 
As I've typed a dozen times in this thread. IF the concern for corruption were valid a) it would be done in a different manner and not only done with an announcement on US TV AND b) concern of corruption in another country, ANY Mother F'n country, would have been expressed in the last 2.5 years (think...ISRAEL)

Moreover, the prosecutor that Biden and the rest of the western world were trying to remove was NOT after Burisma. So, adding a new prosecutor to the mix was risky if you were concerned about Burisma because you were bringing in an unknown.
 
Let's get real:

"Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is an American immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit in the U.S. To be eligible for the program, recipients cannot have felonies or serious misdemeanors on their records. Unlike the proposed DREAM Act, DACA does not provide a path to citizenship for recipients, known as Dreamers.[1][2] The policy, an executive branch memorandum, was announced by President Barack Obama on June 15, 2012. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications for the program on August 15, 2012."

This executive order was 100% politically motivated. It is a change in the law and the Democrats ran interference for Obama on this.
 
Let's get real:

"Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is an American immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit in the U.S. To be eligible for the program, recipients cannot have felonies or serious misdemeanors on their records. Unlike the proposed DREAM Act, DACA does not provide a path to citizenship for recipients, known as Dreamers.[1][2] The policy, an executive branch memorandum, was announced by President Barack Obama on June 15, 2012. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications for the program on August 15, 2012."

This executive order was 100% politically motivated. It is a change in the law and the Democrats ran interference for Obama on this.
70% of Americans support DACA.
 
The way that the GOP is now parroting the talking points of Vlad and how many of DJT's actions sync up with what Putin would want is disconcerting.

You are seriously, not a serious thinker. But you aren't the only Lefty saying this. It isn't a matter of intelligence. It is a matter of people turning off their critical thinking skills.
 
So who the hell cares what the law says? If some poll says 70 percent of people want something, then toss out the Constitution and make it happen.

You beat me to it. That was my point: Obama executed an order that changed the law for political reasons. And it is also my argument that allowing millions of illegal aliens to cross, stay at will and live off of taxpayer money is treason IF he thinks what Trump did is treasonous.
 
I do not. I think they think people like veterans that served yet are here under DACA should get citizenship.

I think they should be allowed to stay. Funny huh? But not by executive order. Trump is supposed to uphold the Constitution aka enforcing EXISTING LAW. Talk to Congress about DACA. That's THEIR job.
 
I don't think treason is a big leap.

Yeah, it's a big leap to put it generously. Let's put it this way. If you take the treason allegation seriously, I never want to hear you complain about someone calling Obama a Muslim or saying he was born in Kenya. Those charges were very nutty but far less so than the treason allegation.

The way that the GOP is now parroting the talking points of Vlad and how many of DJT's actions sync up with what Putin would want is disconcerting

This is coming from someone who voted against Trump because of foreign policy. I'm no hack for him. However, since taking office, we've imposed sanctions on Russia, withdrawn from the INF treaty, given lethal aid to Ukraine, increased the US military presence in Europe, and successfully pushed Western European countries to increase defense spending. None of that is what Putin would want. Have there been stupid moves? Yes. However, on issues of major geopolitical significance, we have not done what Putin would have wanted.
 
This is coming from someone who voted against Trump because of foreign policy. I'm no hack for him. However, since taking office, we've imposed sanctions on Russia, withdrawn from the INF treaty, given lethal aid to Ukraine, increased the US military presence in Europe, and successfully pushed Western European countries to increase defense spending. None of that is what Putin would want. Have there been stupid moves? Yes. However, on issues of major geopolitical significance, we have not done what Putin would have wanted.

And best I can tell, Obama mocked Mitt Romney for identifying Russia as our number one geopolitical threat, told President Medvedev he would have more flexibility after the election, allowed Russia to annex Crimea and presided over the national security apparatus that completely failed to protect us from Russian hacks.

That's not disconcerting? Those four things would indicate that Obama was either being completely incompetent or... no... that's good enough: COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT. I won't call it treasonous except for the election part because we have proof (OUT OF HIS MOUTH) that he was playing politics and lying to the American people in order to bolster his PERSONAL AMBITIONS. And if Trump is considered treasonous (though there is zero direct evidence) then Obama is too.

@OUBubba See how that works?
 
Yeah, it's a big leap to put it generously. Let's put it this way. If you take the treason allegation seriously, I never want to hear you complain about someone calling Obama a Muslim or saying he was born in Kenya. Those charges were very nutty but far less so than the treason allegation.



This is coming from someone who voted against Trump because of foreign policy. I'm no hack for him. However, since taking office, we've imposed sanctions on Russia, withdrawn from the INF treaty, given lethal aid to Ukraine, increased the US military presence in Europe, and successfully pushed Western European countries to increase defense spending. None of that is what Putin would want. Have there been stupid moves? Yes. However, on issues of major geopolitical significance, we have not done what Putin would have wanted.
But, but, Orange Man Putin puppet.
 
Yeah, it's a big leap to put it generously. Let's put it this way. If you take the treason allegation seriously, I never want to hear you complain about someone calling Obama a Muslim or saying he was born in Kenya. Those charges were very nutty but far less so than the treason allegation.



This is coming from someone who voted against Trump because of foreign policy. I'm no hack for him. However, since taking office, we've imposed sanctions on Russia, withdrawn from the INF treaty, given lethal aid to Ukraine, increased the US military presence in Europe, and successfully pushed Western European countries to increase defense spending. None of that is what Putin would want. Have there been stupid moves? Yes. However, on issues of major geopolitical significance, we have not done what Putin would have wanted.
The lethal aid we gave to Ukraine was limited with the armament a few hundred miles from the actual tanks. The sanctions are a smoke screen AFTER the Ukraine dumpster fire.

NATO has been attacked by this Administration, in sync with Russia.
Brexit has been hailed, in sync with Russia.
Russia is against the EU. Trump is as well.
We inexplicably turned on a dime and sold out the Kurds, giving away Syria to the point that we were bombing our own bases and then the Russians moved into them.

Then there's this: 25 times Trump was soft on Russia - CNNPolitics
 
I watched the first 3 hours of today's hearings and just couldn't take it after that. Its so toxic and both sides have an answer/excuse for everything. What a waste of time.
 
The lethal aid we gave to Ukraine was limited with the armament a few hundred miles from the actual tanks. The sanctions are a smoke screen AFTER the Ukraine dumpster fire.

NATO has been attacked by this Administration, in sync with Russia.
Brexit has been hailed, in sync with Russia.
Russia is against the EU. Trump is as well.
We inexplicably turned on a dime and sold out the Kurds, giving away Syria to the point that we were bombing our own bases and then the Russians moved into them.

Then there's this: 25 times Trump was soft on Russia - CNNPolitics

Sometimes people's interests align.

The things you listed are the world Trump inherited.

Do you like NATO and our financial commitment? Half of Britain is in favor of Brexit. Are they Putin fans?

I'm glad we're standing up to the EU. They are an impotent group of virtue signaling socialists, able to play their game because of our financial support. They are also the incubator of white privilege, imperialism and some of the most despotic leaders in the history of mankind. Why the love affair with them?

I don't know enough about the Kurd situation to comment but I seriously doubt Trump is following Putin's lead on this.

In the end, you're looking for a connection because you're upset that the Mueller Report was a complete fail.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top