Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still don't know what UMBC stands for, but I'm glade we didn't play, either.
At least we did not have to play UMBC
we will be fighting for 8th place in the conference next year as well.
causing heartache amongst the fans is NOT the Havoc we were assured we were supposed to be getting. I don't see any of the hustle that his previous team was associated with.Well, Shaka was right in that his scheme is all about Havoc....
Why? Because we might have lost to them too? It's my opinion we had a 50/50 chance of winning or losing to pretty much any team in the tourney.
I get the feeling that you might not have watched them dismantle the #1 seed? I think they would have clocked us by 30 or 40. But if your point was a loss is a loss, then I have no choice but to agree with that.
[QUOTE="mb227, post: 1569508, member: 47056"
I guess it could be worse...at least this squad didn't blow both free throws inside of four seconds like Houston did (after they had at least won a game in the first round).
No, they miss their free throws consistently throughout the game, including Roach missing the front end of a one and one with 18 seconds left and a one point lead. Missing free throws is one of the few things this team did consistently, it’s almost like they practiced it.
Gus poked the bear a little too hard! I guess because I remembered the issue (quite well for a change) that I found it quite easily. https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2864203/cliff-gustafson-v-deloss-dodds/If you can find it on the internet, I would be shocked. Deloss did a magnificent job of keeping it under wraps while preserving Gus' legacy and possibly saving the baseball program.
Cary, I seriously think this team will be much better next year, especially if Jones makes it back. Coleman, Sims and Fevres will all have a year under their belts. Even if Jones doesn't make it back, this team will have decent depth in the backcourt and hopefully Banks and Ham continue to progress in the frontcourt. I compare this team a little to the team Texas had after Durant left. Nobody expected much from that team after he left. They only went to the Elite 8. That is a long way away, but we shall see.I thought we would lose a close game and we did. No one could really predict why, because we have found all sorts of ways to lose a lot of close games this year, and to be fair, win a few.
All the reasons given on this thread for this last lost are good ones. But it could easily have been something else, like it was in any of our other losses.
I think the lack of a team identity, a sort of "go-to" scheme, or some such that would help us in the half court offense, for example, was key in the loss. But even if we would have had that, players have to perform. We don't know what to do when things get tense, when the pressure is on.
Shaka's plan this last game was to go inside more, and they did. Osetkowsky got the message and went inside more, but he did NOT perform. He only scored 7 points, but in the process of going down low, he was fouled repeatedly, hitting only 3 of 8. (HE normally hits about 65%) And missing a front end of a one and one, which should count as two misses instead of one, imo. And really bad, he had FOUR turnovers. That is killer in a close game. If he makes one more FT, or one less TO, we likely win the game. Who would have predicted O would have one of, in not his worst, game of the season?
But even so, I am not Blaming O. It could have been anyone else. So many different players have folded under pressure, held the ball too long, dribbled around the arc till the shot clock runs low and then throws up a prayer, or slash to the hoop in a panic and run into a trap, etc etc. And in the end, its because there is no identity, no go-to scheme that the players know and have confidence in.
I don't think it will change next year. Shaka says its Havoc. But Havoc is close to chaos, and chaos is close to panic. And panic rarely wins close basketball games.
I hope you're right.Cary, I seriously think this team will be much better next year, especially if Jones makes it back
Please define "much better"
9-9 in conference or 10-8
Hopefully the same type of improvement the post Durant team made the following year.Please define "much better"
9-9 in conference or 10-8?
77,
I can easily see your point, but wasn't he HC of the Sacra-tomato Kings?
I just looked him up. His NBA results were poor, but every season as a college head coach has been a success.
I seriously think this team will be much better next year
That is kind of like saying "Other than the gunshot how did you enjoy the play Mrs. Lincoln?"The team was good this year. The talent got us nice leads only to let lack of coaching, motivation and strategy adjustments cost us games in the last 10 minutes of almost every loss. Other teams have a fluid strategy during games while we just keep dribbling the ball around and jacking up threes hoping they go in.