Hillary is not out of the woods yet

LOL - I'm Not With Her

Hillary Clinton asked a top aide in 2011 whether she could fly on a separate airplane from former first lady Michelle Obama to Betty Ford's funeral, according to a newly released email.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-from-michelle-obama-in-2011/article/2624746


57330616.jpg
 
Gee, Maggie, where did people get the idea that the meeting wasn't a big deal at the time.....

DCJX5CeXkAAm3C0.jpg


-------------------

DCJX5xIXcAEkJW1.jpg
 
Gee, Maggie, where did people get the idea that the meeting wasn't a big deal at the time.....

DCJX5CeXkAAm3C0.jpg


-------------------

DCJX5xIXcAEkJW1.jpg
I am not one of the "people" she refers to who didn't think it wasn't vastly consequential. But I'm not surprised a NYT "reporter" would think she speaks for all people.
 
Gee, Maggie, where did people get the idea that the meeting wasn't a big deal at the time.....

DCJX5CeXkAAm3C0.jpg


-------------------

DCJX5xIXcAEkJW1.jpg

It was more consequential than she wanted to admit with a presidential campaign underway. Only an idiot wouldn't have thought it was very suspicious.
 
I am not one of the "people" she refers to who didn't think it wasn't vastly consequential. But I'm not surprised a NYT "reporter" would think she speaks for all people.


That reminds me of the quote attributed to Pauline Kael (writer for the New Yorker Mag) after the 1972 Nixon landslide:

"I don't know how Nixon won. No one I know voted for him."
 
She deserved to lose her clearance a long time ago
With she and several staffers still have high levels of clearance, it seems quite possible they may have been the source of leaks


DC12VulXoAADPDF.jpg
 
She deserved to lose her clearance a long time ago
With she and several staffers still have high levels of clearance, it seems quite possible they may have been the source of leaks


DC12VulXoAADPDF.jpg

This is just unbelievable they still have security clearance.
 
Ive been writing in here about Fusion for several months. Forbes has finally picked up on this story (does this prove Forbes reads Hornsfans? If I were Hornfans, I would be making that connection).
The rest of the MSM still wont touch it. But that does not mean the story is going to die. Grassley's team might be the best investigative team on the Hill.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulro...s-russiagate-really-hillarygate/#6a4711b75cf6


"......... The most under covered story of Russia Gate is the interconnection between the Clinton campaign, an unregistered foreign agent of Russia headquartered in DC (Fusion GPS), and the Christopher Steele Orbis dossier. This connection has raised the question of whether Kremlin prepared the dossier as part of a disinformation campaign to sow chaos in the US political system. If ordered and paid for by Hillary Clinton associates, Russia Gate is turned on its head as collusion between Clinton operatives (not Trump’s) and Russian intelligence. Russia Gate becomes Hillary Gate.

Neither the New York Times, Washington Post, nor CNN has covered this explosive story. Two op-eds have appeared in the Wall Street Journal (Holman Jenkins and David Satter). The possible Russian-intelligence origins of the Steele dossier have been raised only in conservative publications, such as in The Federalist and National Review.

The Fusion story has been known since Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent a heavily-footnoted letter to the Justice Department on March 31, 2017 demanding for his Judiciary Committee all relevant documents on Fusion GPS, the company that managed the Steele dossier against then-candidate Donald Trump. Grassley writes to justify his demand for documents that: “The issue is of particular concern to the Committee given that when Fusion GPS reportedly was acting as an unregistered agent of Russian interests, it appears to have been simultaneously overseeing the creation of the unsubstantiated dossier of allegations of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians.” (Emphasis added.)

Former FBI director, James Comey, refused to answer questions about Fusion and the Steele dossier in his May 3 testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Comey responded to Lindsey Graham’s questions about Fusion GPS’s involvement “in preparing a dossier against Donald Trump that would be interfering in our election by the Russians?” with “I don’t want to say.” Perhaps he will be called on to answer in a forum where he cannot refuse to answer....."
 
Last edited:
Jeh Johnson testifying
Says DNC refused DHS help after alleged hacking

Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said Wednesday the Democratic National Committee decided it didn't need the department's help when it was hacked by the Russians and instead opted to rely on a private cybersecurity firm.

"This was a question I asked repeatedly when I learned of [the hacking]—what are we doing? Are we in there? Are we helping them discover the vulnerabilities, because this was fresh off the OPM experience and there was a point at which DHS cybersecurity experts did get in to OPM and help them discover the bad actors and patch some of the exfiltrations, or at least minimize some of the damage," Johnson said referencing the hack at the Office of Personnel Management.

"I was anxious to know whether our folks were in there, and the response I got was the FBI had spoken to them. They don't want our help. They have CrowdStrike," he said. "That was the answer I got after I asked the question a number of times over the progression of time."

Johnson said he was "not pleased" by the response from the DNC, but said the Department of Homeland Security was limited in its response to the party committee since the department doesn't have the power to patch vulnerabilities over the DNC's objections.

"My interest in helping them was definitely of nonpartisan interest," he said, "and I recall very clearly that I was not pleased that we were not in there helping them patch this vulnerability........."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/f...efused-dhs-help-after-hacking/article/2626627


 
Ive been writing in here about Fusion for several months. ..

"Sketchy firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigators"

"...... What is the company hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources say it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary Clinton, anti-Trump agenda.
* * * *
Fusion GPS was on the payroll of an unidentified Democratic ally of Clinton when it hired a long-retired British spy to dig up dirt on Trump. In 2012, Democrats hired Fusion GPS to uncover dirt on GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. And in 2015, Democratic ally Planned Parenthood retained Fusion GPS to investigate pro-life activists protesting the abortion group.
Moreover, federal records show a key co-founder and partner in the firm was a Hillary Clinton donor and supporter of her presidential campaign.

In September 2016, while Fusion GPS was quietly shopping the dirty dossier on Trump around Washington, its co-founder and partner Peter R. Fritsch contributed at least $1,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund and the Hillary For America campaign, Federal Election Commission data show. His wife also donated money to Hillary’s campaign.

Property records show that in June 2016, as Clinton allies bankrolled Fusion GPS, Fritsch bought a six-bedroom, five-bathroom home in Bethesda, Md., for $2.3 million.

Fritsch did not respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for Fusion GPS said the firm’s work is confidential......"​

http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/
 



" ...... within two days of the deadly terrorist attack on Benghazi, Mohamed Yusuf al-Magariaf, the president of Libya’s National Congress, asked to participate in a Clinton Global Initiative function and “meet President Clinton.” The meeting between the Libyan president and Bill Clinton had not previously been disclosed. The documents also show Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s staff coordinated with the Clinton Foundation’s staff to have her thank Clinton Global Initiative project sponsors for their “commitments” during a Foundation speech on September 25, 2009.

In September 13, 2012, al-Magariaf advisor Dr. Fathi Nuah wrote to the Clinton Foundation’s Director of Foreign Policy Amitabh Desai: “Dr. Almagariaf will be addressing the United Nations this September in New York as the Libyan Head of State, and he expressed a wish to meet President Clinton and to participate at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting for New York as well.”

Four hours later, Desai emailed Hillary Clinton’s Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills asking, “Would USG [U.S. Government] have concerns about Libyan President being invited to CGI [Clinton Global Initiative]? Odd timing, I know.” Mills emailed back: “We would not have issues.”

Four days later, on September 17, Desai emailed Mills again, saying, The Libyan president is “asking for a meeting with WJC [William Jefferson Clinton] next week.” Desai asked, “Would you recommend accepting or declining the WJC meeting request?”

The State Department apparently had no objection to the meeting, because on September 26, Desai emailed Mills, “He had a v good meeting with Libya …” Hillary Clinton and al-Magariaf did not have a meeting until September 24......"

 
Hey, that's Rush's line!

Didn't know that, my bad. Haven't listened to Rush in many years and was in brief stints.

Then again it's a pretty generic, truthful statement. Not sure I'm gonna defer the exclusive rights to Rush.

Broadcasting multiple hours a day for decades, I'm sure the old windbag could claim rights to a lot of common statements others may use. :smile1:
 
Gee, I wonder why they're keeping the hacked DNC server that would prove "Russian collusion" out of reach?

It is perhaps the key piece of forensic evidence in suspected efforts to sway the November presidential election, but federal investigators have yet to get their hands on the hacked computer server that handled email from the Democratic National Committee

Indeed, the only cybersecurity specialists who have taken a look at the server are from, CrowdStrike, the Irvine, California-based private cybersecurity company that the hired to investigate the hack — but which has come under fire itself for its work.

Some critics say CrowdStrike’s evidence for blaming Russia for the hack is thin. Members of Congress say they still believe Russia was responsible but wonder why the has never allowed federal investigators to get a look at the key piece of evidence: the server. Either way, a key “witness” in the political scandal consuming the Trump administration remains beyond the reach of investigators.

“I want to find out from the company [that] did the forensics what their full findings were,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who is leading the Judiciary Committee’s inquiry, told The Washington Times...."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/5/dnc-email-server-most-wanted-evidence-for-russia-i/
 
"New emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.

The Clintons' relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal investigation into his company. Last week, authorities raided the offices of Vekselberg's firm, Renova Group, following allegations of bribery from several of Renova's subsidiaries.

Vekselberg had been named head of a partnership dubbed the "Russian Silicon Valley" just three months before a Clinton Foundation employee began pushing the State Department to approve Bill Clinton's proposed meeting with Vekselberg and a handful of other Russian executives.

* * *

... the records shed light on one of many relationships that blurred the lines between the Clinton's political, financial and philanthropic pursuits while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.

Vekselberg's Renova Group has donated between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, donor records show. Another firm associated with Vekselberg, OC Oerlikon, donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation....."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/e...-oligarch-under-investigation/article/2601514
 
"New emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.

The Clintons' relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal investigation into his company. Last week, authorities raided the offices of Vekselberg's firm, Renova Group, following allegations of bribery from several of Renova's subsidiaries.

Vekselberg had been named head of a partnership dubbed the "Russian Silicon Valley" just three months before a Clinton Foundation employee began pushing the State Department to approve Bill Clinton's proposed meeting with Vekselberg and a handful of other Russian executives.

* * *

... the records shed light on one of many relationships that blurred the lines between the Clinton's political, financial and philanthropic pursuits while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.

Vekselberg's Renova Group has donated between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, donor records show. Another firm associated with Vekselberg, OC Oerlikon, donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation....."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/e...-oligarch-under-investigation/article/2601514

It's just mindboggling that it's just the way it is because she's a democrat. No consequences what so ever from Lorretta Lynch, Comey, Clinton(s), MSM, Lois Lerner, and on and on. They all have gone way past the point of criminal activity. There has to be consequences. This can't be tolerated or it sets a standard that they all are above the law.
 
If nothing else I hope it gives voters another reason not to vote for Dems - they are crooks who will not be held to account for their actions.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top