Hillary is not out of the woods yet

Bloomberg travels like Hillary, but he doesnt need the corrupt foundation to do it

ERWTxJJVUAA26Hn.jpg
 
Yet, Hilllary sent one of her ambassadors into Libya and kept him there with no security for an arms deal with Al Qaeda. He died directly from her leadership.
 
Horn6721 said:
Amazing that LH thought your post was funny.
I guess Ambassador's deaths are funny to lefties.
Click to expand...
To be fair, I don't think he thinks his death is funny. I think he thinks it is funny to say those things about Hillary Saying true things about her that make her look bad, while ay to do, makes him laugh.
 
Joe Fan said:
Tangentially related

Laureate Education, Inc. is in trouble with the SEC for failure to disclose that it is under IRS investigation in its IPO offering (which launches in a few days). Laureate's IRS problem has to do with its “pay to play” relationship with Bill and Hillary Clinton. Not to get too deep in SEC rules, but this type of thing (IRS issue) MUST be disclosed (and its not a close call).

Laureate’s relationship with the Clintons began in 2010, when it paid Bill $16.5M as its “honorary chancellor” for five years. If you do not already know, that title means he did nothing. He got paid $16.5M for doing nothing.

But wait, that's not all, Laureate's chairman and CEO Douglas Becker also donated another ~$5M to the Clinton Foundation.

But wait, that's not all (again), while Hillary was SOS, State’s U.S. Agency for International Development awarded $55M to the International Youth Foundation (IYF), which is linked to Laureate and is chaired by Becker.

Lastly, the current version of Laurete is a KKR deal (which, if you know what that means, you know it was an LBO). The LBO (2007) left the company with principal owners including George Soros and Paul Allen. Steven A. Cohen used to also be an owner but he is now barred by the SEC from managing anyone else's money. It's a lovely group.

Admit it, you knew Soros would somehow be involved in this mess.

IPO Calendar

Here, the WAPO says Bill got $18M total from them https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...3fc4d4d12b4_story.html?utm_term=.7dcca10d193b
Click to expand...


I have long believed that some of these big money Republicans are dirty nasty MFers. But they have nothing on these Democrats. You see, Democrats want to make poor people think they are good people trying to help them while all their maneuvers are designed to basically enslave all of us (with laws and loss of our rights)_ who are not in their little club while they are part of a new American Oligarchy that are basically immune to all laws.

I have long held one important belief, no other amendment is more important than the 2nd Amendment. The reason for this is that we need our government to fear the American people. We need them to know that no matter how big their military is and how big their secret police is, they know that they are out gunned by the people, and if it comes to it, we are the strongest force in this country. We have a 1 million man standing army. Well the American people have a 300 million man army with over 300 million guns. We can do as our forefather did and rise up against their tyranny.
 
Last edited:
How else do you hold a government accountable.

Voting doesn't work. Look at the crooks who have made a career out of grift in the government.
 
It makes me want secession or any other kind of decentralization with citizens not only voting the injust out but showing up at their house to tar and feather them.
 
Monahorns said:
It makes me want secession or any other kind of decentralization with citizens not only voting the injust out but showing up at their house to tar and feather them.
Click to expand...

Sometimes folks talk in terms of another "Civil War" coming to the US. Which makes me occasionally wonder what it would actually look like if we did. One thing is clear, it would not be like the last one. That war involved state actors, secession and a convenient geographical divide.

If it did happen again, there would not be state actors or secession or the neat geography. So what would it look like? It would be all mixed up, with divides within states. I think the big thing would be domestic terrorism. We have had that before. I was a kid at the time but roughly from 1969 through 1972, there was a domestic terrorism campaign that was pretty wild. It seems like hardly anyone in the US remembers this period anymore.

Here are some pull quotes from the memoirs of Richard Nixon. He is talking here just about the beginnings of that moment --

download


RN_%2BThe%2BMemoirs%2Bof%2BRichard%2BNixon%2B-%2BRichard%2BNixon%2B-.png


On top of that, during the first three years of Richard Nixon’s presidency, there were 34 airline hijackings. And on top of that there was an international terrorist movement that began more or less with the 1968 hijacking of an El Al flight but was punctuated for all time by the 1972 Munich Olympics terrorist attack.

So even though we often think of liberals as being anti-gun and thus unprepared to follow through with physical threats, this period shows they can be very nasty in terms of bombings, arson and hijackings. And they would again receive aid from outside the US just as happened in the Nixon period. Back then, the Black Panthers got aid from North Korea and radical Arabs. The Weathermen got aid from North Korea, Cuba and North Vietnam. And, of course, the Soviets were directly funding campus groups and some labor movements.
 
Sometimes folks talk in terms of another "Civil War" coming to the US. Which makes me occasionally wonder what it would actually look like if we did. One thing is clear, it would not be like the last one. That war involved state actors, secession and a convenient geographical divide.
Click to expand...

I don't think secession means there would be a war. It could be a peaceful dissolution of the Federation. I have also seen petitions to change state borders. That is another way to do it.

But I do agree that any new borders wouldn't use current state borders. The map would look totally different.
 
Joe Fan: those weren't liberals blowing stuff up and high jacking airplanes. Those were communists. You acknowledge a difference don't you?
 
If Hillary has to testify she can do like the sainted RONALD REAGAN did after he left office and was quizzed on the Iran-Contra weapons giveaway----just say he didn't remember. It worked for saint ronnie
 
huisache said:
Joe Fan: those weren't liberals blowing stuff up and high jacking airplanes. Those were communists. You acknowledge a difference don't you?
Click to expand...
The SDS and weather underground leaders are now part of the leadership of the Democrat party. There is no difference.
 
Back on June 2, 2020. Hillary went to court to seek a “writ of mandamus” which would have allowed her to avoid answering questions about her email scandal.
She lost.
And so now her testimony is due in September, which should be available to the public.
 
Joe Fan said:
Back on June 2, 2020. Hillary went to court to seek a “writ of mandamus” which would have allowed her to avoid answering questions about her email scandal.
She lost.
And so now her testimony is due in September, which should be available to the public.
Click to expand...

What will this testimony really accomplish though?
 
Podcast on how she funneled tax money to her Foundation while SoS
Code: 
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-27-investigators-who-dissected-clinton-foundations/id1491435111?i=1000477418276
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top