Triple
so you are saying people would go to the trouble of fraud at a caucus but not a general election?
that they would care enough to commit fraud at a caucus but not at an election where the candidate they frauded for might need their fake votes even more?
if I went to the trouble of using a false name to appear at a public caucus I would make sure the candidate I supported got my fake vote in the real election as well.
This is from the NY TImes on requiring voter id
" Democrats charge that the true purpose of the laws is to deter participation by some predictably Democratic voters, particularly poor people and members of minority groups "
but now Dems in Nev say it ok when it suits their purpose.
This is not apples and oranges, this is requiring voter Id when it suits
Or are Dems ok with disenfranchsing voters when it fits their agenda
so you are saying people would go to the trouble of fraud at a caucus but not a general election?
that they would care enough to commit fraud at a caucus but not at an election where the candidate they frauded for might need their fake votes even more?
if I went to the trouble of using a false name to appear at a public caucus I would make sure the candidate I supported got my fake vote in the real election as well.
This is from the NY TImes on requiring voter id
" Democrats charge that the true purpose of the laws is to deter participation by some predictably Democratic voters, particularly poor people and members of minority groups "
but now Dems in Nev say it ok when it suits their purpose.
This is not apples and oranges, this is requiring voter Id when it suits
Or are Dems ok with disenfranchsing voters when it fits their agenda