Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

I just wanted to go back and show some of the lies Maricopa have done. If one of you people who don't believe in election fraud can explain to me with a straight face that isn't highly suspicious behavior then please do it.


Here's another doozy. Check out the graph below.
First of all they say they have no routers. We now know this isn't true.




Man, if Maricopa gets away with this **** I know the AG isn't doing his job.
 
With signature matching software you can be as loose or as strict as you want. Here is a secretly recorded video of the AZ Senate researchers setting the strictness for the signature comparison.


You are missing the big picture: everything was loosened in 2020 that gave Dems the advantage. That’s the point.
 
You are missing the big picture: everything was loosened in 2020 that gave Dems the advantage. That’s the point.

"Everything was loosened". I didn't read the report. Was the signature rejection rate gravely different in 2020 than 2016? If so, did they change the signature verification software vendor? Was the software configuration in 2016 the same as 2020? If not, why not? Those would be essential questions to answer to justify the claim.
 
Wasn’t software

In the signature verification study, three expert forensic document examiners and three novices reviewed 499 images of early voting mail ballot envelopes to determine if the signatures on them matched with the signatures on file. All the reviewers agreed that 60 of the 499 envelopes, or 12% were signature mismatches.
 
Wasn’t software

In the signature verification study, three expert forensic document examiners and three novices reviewed 499 images of early voting mail ballot envelopes to determine if the signatures on them matched with the signatures on file. All the reviewers agreed that 60 of the 499 envelopes, or 12% were signature mismatches.
My signature is a hot mess. 12% mismatches seems within the realm of reasonable. I think signatures are fluid. But, what do I know?
 
My signature is a hot mess. 12% mismatches seems within the realm of reasonable. I think signatures are fluid. But, what do I know?

They are fluid. Very few signatures remain the same over time which is why mail-in ballot states have a margin for error in their signature verification software and a process for appealing if the ballot gets rejected due to signature mismatch. My wife had to endure this in 2008 in Washington State and it was in fact her signature, both of them. The AZ Senate has 60 ballots which they claim don't match the signatures. Investigate those individuals. Follow-up and determine if they are in fact the same person. If they are, then research process and claim is bunk. If they actually find evidence of fraud, they found what they've spent millions of dollars in search of. Do you think they'll investigate those 60 or is it easier to say 12% mismatch and 200k fraudulent votes? I'd wager the latter gets them more airplay towards their goals. More restrictive voting and a claim of voter fraud to support their belief system and fundraising goals.
 
My signature is a hot mess. 12% mismatches seems within the realm of reasonable. I think signatures are fluid. But, what do I know?
Broken watch...

I would need to look to see if we are comparing live ink to a copy of live ink or a digital copy from one of those stupid pads like at the cash registers and DPS. If it is not live to a copy of live, the comparison is useless. My digital signature using those stupid pads looks NOTHING like my actual signature...and that is true even considering my usual signature is more of a scrawl.
 
They are fluid. Very few signatures remain the same over time which is why mail-in ballot states have a margin for error in their signature verification software and a process for appealing if the ballot gets rejected due to signature mismatch. My wife had to endure this in 2008 in Washington State and it was in fact her signature, both of them. The AZ Senate has 60 ballots which they claim don't match the signatures. Investigate those individuals. Follow-up and determine if they are in fact the same person. If they are, then research process and claim is bunk. If they actually find evidence of fraud, they found what they've spent millions of dollars in search of. Do you think they'll investigate those 60 or is it easier to say 12% mismatch and 200k fraudulent votes? I'd wager the latter gets them more airplay towards their goals. More restrictive voting and a claim of voter fraud to support their belief system and fundraising goals.
We both know what’s going to happen. They will extrapolate 12% across all ballots cast as fraudulent across all 50 states and provinces as well.

PS: buy my pillow.
 
You people are nuts. You get very excited over anything election related. That was such a small sample, they are trying to get a bigger investigation, Yep trying to get mo money.
 
He sells slippers now too. Saw that watching FoxNews Sunday. He's exhausted his pillow sales and needs to milk them for more $$.

He has to. How many pillows can someone buy? He needs to come out with something more consumable that people will keep buying. I'd suggest steaks, but Trump Steaks didn't do so well.
 
Just looking for an update. Do we have a new date for the military to reinstate Trump?
The same day Trump Russia collusion is proven. However, given the military actions during the Afghan abandonment and Russia’s military actions, it may already be set in stone.
 
https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...e-prosecute-if

Georgia's election chief is vowing a full-scale investigation into allegations Democrats may have illegally harvested ballots in the 2020 election, saying his team is preparing subpoenas to "follow the money" and bring prosecutions if warranted.

....

"Right now we're waiting for the State Election Board to pick their new chair, so that we can ask for a subpoena," he told the "Just the News" television show Tuesday night on Real America's Voice.

Raffensperger says his investigative team wants to use the subpoena to secure the identity of a John Doe witness/whistleblower who told the election watchdog group True the Vote last year that he was paid thousands of dollars to collect third-party ballots during Georgia's November 2020 general election and Jan. 5, 2021 runoff election that gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.
 
https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...e-prosecute-if

Georgia's election chief is vowing a full-scale investigation into allegations Democrats may have illegally harvested ballots in the 2020 election, saying his team is preparing subpoenas to "follow the money" and bring prosecutions if warranted.

....

"Right now we're waiting for the State Election Board to pick their new chair, so that we can ask for a subpoena," he told the "Just the News" television show Tuesday night on Real America's Voice.

Raffensperger says his investigative team wants to use the subpoena to secure the identity of a John Doe witness/whistleblower who told the election watchdog group True the Vote last year that he was paid thousands of dollars to collect third-party ballots during Georgia's November 2020 general election and Jan. 5, 2021 runoff election that gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.

If laws were broken then I hope the catch and prosecute the perpetrators. If there is any powder left after previous misfires I'd recommend keeping it dry until indictments occur. The Boy Who Cried Wolf 100x isn't the best look.
 


One of the processes that was detailed (in AZ?) during the audits was a legal process poll workers took for copying ballots that couldn't scan. I think it was the international ballots that would get faxed from the state to the municipalities. Given this woman is doing this in full view of everyone, including the videographer, says she's probably above board. That won't stop the conspiracy theorists from running with it just as they did in 2020 with Atlanta and others. Occam's Razor...
 
One of the processes that was detailed (in AZ?) during the audits was a legal process poll workers took for copying ballots that couldn't scan. I think it was the international ballots that would get faxed from the state to the municipalities. Given this woman is doing this in full view of everyone, including the videographer, says she's probably above board. That won't stop the conspiracy theorists from running with it just as they did in 2020 with Atlanta and others. Occam's Razor...

Did you watch the video? She wasn't copying anything. She was stamping and filling out blank ballots all exactly the same way. There's absolutely nothing in that video suggesting she was copying ballots.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top