Filing Complaints on Neighbor's Pets?

you need to be careful on this board, there are those that get upset if you talk about killing plants or terrorists.
 
"they said b/c the dog is in the yard and now out and hasn't attacked a person, there is nothing they can do." This is a ******* lie. How can you tell if a cop is lying? His lips are moving.

Sec. 822.012. CERTAIN DOGS AND COYOTES PROHIBITED FROM RUNNING AT LARGE; CRIMINAL PENALTY. (a) The owner, keeper, or person in control of a dog or coyote that the owner, keeper, or person knows is accustomed to run, worry, or kill livestock, domestic animals, or fowls may not permit the dog or coyote to run at large.

(b) A person who violates this section commits an offense. An offense under this subsection is punishable by a fine of not more than $100.

(c) Each time a dog or coyote runs at large in violation of this section constitutes a separate offense.

Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Renumbered from Health & Safety Code Sec. 822.011 and amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1002, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

And, if the cops still refuse to act after you inform their dumb asses what the law says, you may have to take matters in your own hands. Personally, I just shoot the ******* dog.

Sec. 822.013. DOGS OR COYOTES THAT ATTACK ANIMALS. (a) A dog or coyote that is attacking, is about to attack, or has recently attacked livestock, domestic animals, or fowls may be killed by:

(1) any person witnessing the attack; or

(2) the attacked animal's owner or a person acting on behalf of the owner if the owner or person has knowledge of the attack.

(b) A person who kills a dog or coyote as provided by this section is not liable for damages to the owner, keeper, or person in control of the dog or coyote.

(c) A person who discovers on the person's property a dog or coyote known or suspected of having killed livestock, domestic animals, or fowls may detain or impound the dog or coyote and return it to its owner or deliver the dog or coyote to the local animal control authority. The owner of the dog or coyote is liable for all costs incurred in the capture and care of the dog or coyote and all damage done by the dog or coyote.

(d) The owner, keeper, or person in control of a dog or coyote that is known to have attacked livestock, domestic animals, or fowls shall control the dog or coyote in a manner approved by the local animal control authority.

(e) A person is not required to acquire a hunting license under Section 42.002, Parks and Wildlife Code, to kill a dog or coyote under this section.

Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Renumbered from Health & Safety Code Sec. 822.033 and amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1002, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

I respect and love animals (we have 2 dogs and 5 cats), but I will not tolerate an animal that attacks or kills another animal for no reason.
 
I love the indignant poster.

Hey GT, you have been on the board for 1 year now, and you cant tell that 90% of the stuff on here is posted as tongue in cheek?

and as others have mentioned, your point was made in your first post.

your point was also made in your second post.

then you really made your point in that third post.

but thank god you made your point a fourth time.

Otherwise I might have had to go outside and shot about 30 or 40 dogs or cats while laughing at my grand gesture of irresponsibility.


we got your freaking point, and other than you, pretty much EVERYONE ELSE recognized the post was sarcasm.

welcome to the internet, its serious business.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top