Musburger1
2,500+ Posts
Biden given options for unprecedented cyberattacks against Russia
1. Someone just wants to inform the public of what policies are being considered.
2. Its aimed at Russia as a warning.
3. The story is meant to scare the American public in preparation of a financial reset.
Let's look at choice 3. At some point in the near future - probably later this year or next - the US and the rest of the world will adopt a new financial system based on blockchain and/or distributed ledger technology. This would be essentially safeguarded from cyberattack if I understand correctly. But potentially, depending on how it is implemented, would also give the government or federal reserve the kind of power of personal finances that China is implementing with the digital yuan. If citizens are more afraid of a cyber attack than they are of the government, they will more readily except a financial reset. Never let a crises go to waste.
President Joe Biden has been presented with a menu of options for the U.S. to carry out massive cyberattacks designed to disrupt Russia’s ability to sustain its military operations in Ukraine, four people familiar with the deliberations tell NBC News.
Two U.S. intelligence officials, one Western intelligence official and another person briefed on the matter say no final decisions have been made, but they say U.S. intelligence and military cyber warriors are proposing the use of American cyberweapons on a scale never before contemplated. Among the options: disrupting internet connectivity across Russia, shutting off electric power, and tampering with railroad switches to hamper Russia’s ability to resupply its forces, three of the sources said.
“You could do everything from slow the trains down to have them fall off the tracks,” one person briefed on the matter said.
The sources said the options presented include pre-emptive responses to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, irrespective of whether Russian launches its own cyberattacks on the U.S. in retaliation for sanctions. They said most of the potential cyberattacks under consideration are designed to disrupt but not destroy, and therefore fall short of an act of war by the United States against Russia. They say the idea is to harm networks, not people. Officials are debating the legal authorities under which the attacks would take place — whether they would be covert action or clandestine military activity. Either way, the U.S. would not publicly acknowledge carrying out the operations, the sources say. U.S. Cyber Command, the National Security Agency, the CIA and other agencies would have a role to play in the operations, the sources said.
“Our response will be harsh and measured, but not so severe as to encourage Putin to take more drastic steps,” one U.S. official said.
The White House did not initially respond to a request for comment. After publication, Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, said in a statement, “This report is wildly off base and does not reflect what is actually being discussed in any shape or form.”
Whenever I read something like this now, my radar goes up. Somebody wants to put this information out there. What could the motive be?Two U.S. intelligence officials, one Western intelligence official and another person briefed on the matter say no final decisions have been made, but they say U.S. intelligence and military cyber warriors are proposing the use of American cyberweapons on a scale never before contemplated. Among the options: disrupting internet connectivity across Russia, shutting off electric power, and tampering with railroad switches to hamper Russia’s ability to resupply its forces, three of the sources said.
“You could do everything from slow the trains down to have them fall off the tracks,” one person briefed on the matter said.
The sources said the options presented include pre-emptive responses to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, irrespective of whether Russian launches its own cyberattacks on the U.S. in retaliation for sanctions. They said most of the potential cyberattacks under consideration are designed to disrupt but not destroy, and therefore fall short of an act of war by the United States against Russia. They say the idea is to harm networks, not people. Officials are debating the legal authorities under which the attacks would take place — whether they would be covert action or clandestine military activity. Either way, the U.S. would not publicly acknowledge carrying out the operations, the sources say. U.S. Cyber Command, the National Security Agency, the CIA and other agencies would have a role to play in the operations, the sources said.
“Our response will be harsh and measured, but not so severe as to encourage Putin to take more drastic steps,” one U.S. official said.
The White House did not initially respond to a request for comment. After publication, Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, said in a statement, “This report is wildly off base and does not reflect what is actually being discussed in any shape or form.”
1. Someone just wants to inform the public of what policies are being considered.
2. Its aimed at Russia as a warning.
3. The story is meant to scare the American public in preparation of a financial reset.
Let's look at choice 3. At some point in the near future - probably later this year or next - the US and the rest of the world will adopt a new financial system based on blockchain and/or distributed ledger technology. This would be essentially safeguarded from cyberattack if I understand correctly. But potentially, depending on how it is implemented, would also give the government or federal reserve the kind of power of personal finances that China is implementing with the digital yuan. If citizens are more afraid of a cyber attack than they are of the government, they will more readily except a financial reset. Never let a crises go to waste.
