At least CNN is neutral

H

Horn6721

Hook'em
whiteflag.gif

A CNN ' political " reporter used his CNN account to tweet BO's donation link to all his followers.
You can't make this stuff upThe Link

and 5 dasy later no one at CNN has disavowed.
 
CNN seems to be the most neutral of the major channels, but they are still more pro-democrat.

Fox and MSNBC are the most cartoonish channels obviously.
 
None of these networks are fair. They all put a spin on everything they do. It's all a matter of degree. MSNBC is shameless. They are a propaganda source and nothing more. Fox is a little closer to the center than that. CNN is a little closer to the center than Fox. If I put them on a -10 - 10 scale, I'd go:

MSNBC: -10
Fox: 8
CNN - 7
 
Good point. How do we know those screen shots are really from Fox News, and not just some left-wing Photoshop job?
 
mojo
They are probably really Fox
I would just like to see when they aired

I also wonder how Mich got 2 screen shots like this? does hhe/she keep ALL Fox vids and then picl the ones he/she thinks makes Fox look bad?
 
Mojo,

You are out of your mind to think that Fox is more neutral than CNN. I am being kind when I say CNN is more middle ground than Fox or CNN, but I think all three channels suck.

Fox is blatantly pro-Republican to its core, almost as bad as MSNBC is pro-Democrat. Bill O Reilly, Sean Hannity and Mike Huckabee (God he is maybe the worst) are all super pro Republican.

To say Fox is anywhere close to being neutral is what is laughable.
 
2003,

Never said Fox was neutral.

In any case, if you think that CNN is more neutral than Fox, it is you that is out of your mind.
 
I would agree with 2003 that CNN is slightly more neutral than Fox, but it's a close call. Both are pretty slanted, and again, MSNBC is a joke. It's by far the worst.
 
MrD

Fox is not completely neutral but if we made a side by side list of people CNN has on ho are conervative and people who Fox has on who are liberal the Fox list would be at least twice as long as the CNN list
 
I actually thought about posting a question recently about where people get their news and what do people think are the most objection, fair handed sources.

I fully agree with what is being said....NONE of the major news sources are unbiased and which ones are least biased is simply a matter of opinion. I remember a debate on here or some similar message board a few years ago as to whether there was a liberal media bias. Some poster(s) proclaimed there is no left media bias. Now more than ever I find that to be the opinion of an ignorant fool. It seems that if you think your mainstream media outlet is unbiased, it's only because they agree with your bias and you might not be smart enough to know it. (This is not meant to be about anyone specific.)

That being said - are there any less mainstream (ie internet) places where a person can go to find unbiased reporting without the obligatory partisan hatchet job articles like "Is Bush/Obama the worst president ever?"
 
Last week I saw these people were on Fox and not one of them was shouted down: David Axelrod, sheila Jackson Lee, chuck Schumher. Debbie W shultz, Evan Bayh, John Podesta,Charlie Rangel and keith ellison

and those are the ones I remember

None of those people were insulted or denigrated.
 
Maybe I should try Fox again. Last time I watched they were so comically biased it seemed like they were aiming the programming at the adrenal gland rather than the cerebral cortex. If what they were doing could seem to anybody like they were trying to be fair, I must have just caught them at a bad moment.
I've watched MSNBC some lately. They are certainly biased but I don't hear much from intelligent liberals and like 'em or hate 'em I think Maddow and Lawerence O'Donnell have some fresh and interesting perspectives on issues. While they don't hesitate to skewer guests or hold them accountable when they evade questions, I don't see the angry, low-brow, beatdowns the guys at Fox sometimes have employed.
 
OK I did try FOX. Hannity. Michelle Bachmann as a guest suggest the reason Iran wants the nuclear bomb is to use the threat to impose Shira law worldwide, just as the mobs in the streets wish. Think of the mob with nuclear warheads. Ever the newsman, Hannity eschews clarification but instead gushes approval for the insight while never imaging more skeptical folks might want evidence or logic before assuming the ever brilliant Congresswoman's insight.
Holy ****, I'd be concerned if I were in Brazil where the Brazilian Wax has gotta have these radical muslims losing their minds..., not to mention relatively nearby Thailand where Japanese businessmen routinely take sex holidays. This was after Hannity offered brilliant insight into how stupid Obama is, ruining the economy and making a muck of foreigh affairs. I guess that's useful insight, alas Hannity gave no guidance about getting from Point A (What's going on here?). to B (This inarguably the worst president since Carter.)?
In summary -- much is amiss in this world. If you can't see how Obama is responsible for all of this you are too stupid to matter. We don't have time for evidence or reason ... we gotta act now to get this crazy man out of power.
 
Crockett,

Try FOX news, not the FOX personalities. Hannity etc are biased just as Maddow, Grandholm, Fat Ed, O'Donnel etc. You'll not get a fair view there......It's the NEWS section of FOX that is "more" fair and balanced than any other.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top