Any chance Plonsky will be gone too?

[Moooooo]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[utfannforlife]

Moo echo's my point. As much as I love this university, and think that we did the right thing in letting Kearney go, we did not do the right thing with the other situations referenced above. Her and Major's situations are more similar than they are different which points to inequality. I doubt this will go to trial, because I am sure that Bev knows way more than the school wants disclosed. She would do far more damage than a million dollars is worth especially at a place like Texas.

 

[BabHorn]

Ahh, thanks, Moo & Utfan. Sorry, I had not heard that. That's certainly changes things more towards Kearney's point of view.

 

[overseasbbfan1]

Agree the added context from Moooo and utfann is helpful. Here is a blurb from an article/link provided on another HF forum:

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Moooooo]

From Barking Carnival:
The Link

The Kearney Lawsuit

I've made my opinion known on it. Whatever your feelings on it, don't be surprised if UT refuses to settle, goes to discovery, and uses what it potentially reveals, however embarrassing in the short term, to document the mess in women's athletics to take away their political protection, providing the disinfecting sunlight needed to enable a new direction with a thorough house cleaning. I wont get into the details, but it's a disgrace over there.

People have avoided taking on the management nightmares in Women's Athletics - starting at the top with Plonsky -mainly out of political fear and the department wide managerial willingness to use gender/sexuality as behavioral teflon. That should be coming to an end. Which is great news for the actual Women's Programs and athletes, who should have been the focus all along. Bless the Jerritt Elliott's who succeed anyway.

 

[TEXASMADE]

Sounds like someone needs to go then. Tired of reading about the disfunction in the sports dept especially the women's side.