2025 Texas Rangers

The Dodgers just signed Tanner Scott so signing Yates to an already overwhelming bullpen of high-leverage arms is just a big FU to MLB and the concept of a luxury tax preventing a team from doing exactly what the Dodgers are doing.


Not sure where the Rangers go from here unless they want to see if someone like Gray or Rocker could transition to a closer role.
While trading within divisions is a no no in many cases, perhaps the Astros would be willing to offer Ryan Pressley to the Rangers (and maybe even pick up half his salary $14 million). Pressley has a no trade provision, but he might waive it for the Rangers. The Astros are still trying to cut some salary and Pressley is the obvious choice.

With regard to the Dodgers, I did a quick look at the projected luxury tax for 2025. The Dodgers luxury tax was coming in at about $94 million which exceeds the total payroll for nine teams. Baseball is being destroyed by various actions, not the least of which are the oligarchs in LA and NY who have so much money they could care less if they incur the tax.......as long as it brings them championships. Any legitimate baseball fan (non Dodgers) will be pulling against dem bums for the immediate future.

One last unrelated comment. Congrats to Billy Wagner as he should have already been in the HOF. I got to attend the Astros HOF induction ceremonies last year and talked to Wagner for 10-15 minutes. He is a really good guy and his back story on how he became a left handed pitcher is quite interesting.
 
With regard to the Dodgers, I did a quick look at the projected luxury tax for 2025. The Dodgers luxury tax was coming in at about $94 million which exceeds the total payroll for nine teams. Baseball is being destroyed by various actions, not the least of which are the oligarchs in LA and NY who have so much money they could care less if they incur the tax.......as long as it brings them championships.
How absurd this is! The small-market teams are automatically non-competitive before the season starts. I do not care to watch a World Series between the Dodgers and the Yankees - knowing they both bought their League championships.
 
How absurd this is! The small-market teams are automatically non-competitive before the season starts. I do not care to watch a World Series between the Dodgers and the Yankees - knowing they both bought their League championships.
Small market teams have always had this issue, but now the mid market teams ( which for this discussion I include both the Rangers and the Astros) are significantly impacted. The regular season is almost unwatchable, but if you make the playoffs anything is possible. All non oligarch teams must structure and develop their teams accordingly- they will never compete trying to outspend.
 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."

 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."

Rosenthal is trying to provide cover for the Dodgers. If he honestly believes that 75% of the owners could do exactly what the Dodgers are doing he is certifiably insane. First you have the wealthy of each owner (owner groups) to consider, but you also have local TV money which for teams like the Astros and Rangers is nominal compared to the Dodgers, Yanks or Mets.

Billy Beane and the A's (Moneyball) had the right approach but now the multiples of difference in team salaries is not even in the same galaxy. MLB is sadly slowly dying and while it will still be operating after I die (I'm 66), money is its cancer and eventually MLB will cease in the form it exists today.
 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."


This is the classic, "You're just jealous" argument. It is lazy and indicates a tremendous bias. I don't want to buy everyone. It's not that important to me. I once loved the game. But a level playing field is very important. Seeing Buffalo and Green Bay remain competitive is why I like the NFL (besides the fact that baseball is boring as heck in mid-July). Small markets can compete. It's great for their fans. But look at the problems in Pittsburgh where the owner keeps the payroll under ticket and merchandise sales. Sharing the wealth as they do in the NFL keeps the competitive balance.
 
While trading within divisions is a no no in many cases, perhaps the Astros would be willing to offer Ryan Pressley to the Rangers (and maybe even pick up half his salary $14 million). Pressley has a no trade provision, but he might waive it for the Rangers. The Astros are still trying to cut some salary and Pressley is the obvious choice.
You are not the only one thinking about this.

 
Next question - are the Rangers interested in Pressly? Could he be the closer, or do the Rangers have other alternatives in mind? It's been pretty silent the last few days, and pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training on 12 Feb (just 18 days away).
 
Next question - are the Rangers interested in Pressly? Could he be the closer, or do the Rangers have other alternatives in mind? It's been pretty silent the last few days, and pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training on 12 Feb (just 18 days away).
Like many pitchers Pressly was impacted when MLB banned the "magic baseball rub" which negatively impacts spin rate (Pressly had and still has a high spin rate). I would characterize Pressly as a good reliever, but not dominating. Many clubs would love to have him, but when the Astros signed Josh Hader that sent Pressly back to the set up role and he was clearly upset. A change of scenery could be just what he needs and its only a one year commitment so why not take a chance.

The salary cut for the Astros is more important than the prospect clubs may offer. I just don't know whether the Stros will want to send him to a divisional rival.
 
Rangers listed as one of seven teams expected to make biggest improvement in 2025

 

Recent Threads

Back
Top