2025 Texas Rangers

The Dodgers just signed Tanner Scott so signing Yates to an already overwhelming bullpen of high-leverage arms is just a big FU to MLB and the concept of a luxury tax preventing a team from doing exactly what the Dodgers are doing.


Not sure where the Rangers go from here unless they want to see if someone like Gray or Rocker could transition to a closer role.
While trading within divisions is a no no in many cases, perhaps the Astros would be willing to offer Ryan Pressley to the Rangers (and maybe even pick up half his salary $14 million). Pressley has a no trade provision, but he might waive it for the Rangers. The Astros are still trying to cut some salary and Pressley is the obvious choice.

With regard to the Dodgers, I did a quick look at the projected luxury tax for 2025. The Dodgers luxury tax was coming in at about $94 million which exceeds the total payroll for nine teams. Baseball is being destroyed by various actions, not the least of which are the oligarchs in LA and NY who have so much money they could care less if they incur the tax.......as long as it brings them championships. Any legitimate baseball fan (non Dodgers) will be pulling against dem bums for the immediate future.

One last unrelated comment. Congrats to Billy Wagner as he should have already been in the HOF. I got to attend the Astros HOF induction ceremonies last year and talked to Wagner for 10-15 minutes. He is a really good guy and his back story on how he became a left handed pitcher is quite interesting.
 
With regard to the Dodgers, I did a quick look at the projected luxury tax for 2025. The Dodgers luxury tax was coming in at about $94 million which exceeds the total payroll for nine teams. Baseball is being destroyed by various actions, not the least of which are the oligarchs in LA and NY who have so much money they could care less if they incur the tax.......as long as it brings them championships.
How absurd this is! The small-market teams are automatically non-competitive before the season starts. I do not care to watch a World Series between the Dodgers and the Yankees - knowing they both bought their League championships.
 
How absurd this is! The small-market teams are automatically non-competitive before the season starts. I do not care to watch a World Series between the Dodgers and the Yankees - knowing they both bought their League championships.
Small market teams have always had this issue, but now the mid market teams ( which for this discussion I include both the Rangers and the Astros) are significantly impacted. The regular season is almost unwatchable, but if you make the playoffs anything is possible. All non oligarch teams must structure and develop their teams accordingly- they will never compete trying to outspend.
 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."

 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."

Rosenthal is trying to provide cover for the Dodgers. If he honestly believes that 75% of the owners could do exactly what the Dodgers are doing he is certifiably insane. First you have the wealthy of each owner (owner groups) to consider, but you also have local TV money which for teams like the Astros and Rangers is nominal compared to the Dodgers, Yanks or Mets.

Billy Beane and the A's (Moneyball) had the right approach but now the multiples of difference in team salaries is not even in the same galaxy. MLB is sadly slowly dying and while it will still be operating after I die (I'm 66), money is its cancer and eventually MLB will cease in the form it exists today.
 
Ken Rosenthal has some not necessarily wrong thoughts on what the Dodgers are doing:

"Deep in the heart of every baseball fan fuming about the spending of the Los Angeles Dodgers, there lies an uncomfortable truth: You’re just mad your owner isn’t doing the same thing."


This is the classic, "You're just jealous" argument. It is lazy and indicates a tremendous bias. I don't want to buy everyone. It's not that important to me. I once loved the game. But a level playing field is very important. Seeing Buffalo and Green Bay remain competitive is why I like the NFL (besides the fact that baseball is boring as heck in mid-July). Small markets can compete. It's great for their fans. But look at the problems in Pittsburgh where the owner keeps the payroll under ticket and merchandise sales. Sharing the wealth as they do in the NFL keeps the competitive balance.
 
While trading within divisions is a no no in many cases, perhaps the Astros would be willing to offer Ryan Pressley to the Rangers (and maybe even pick up half his salary $14 million). Pressley has a no trade provision, but he might waive it for the Rangers. The Astros are still trying to cut some salary and Pressley is the obvious choice.
You are not the only one thinking about this.

 
Next question - are the Rangers interested in Pressly? Could he be the closer, or do the Rangers have other alternatives in mind? It's been pretty silent the last few days, and pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training on 12 Feb (just 18 days away).
 
Next question - are the Rangers interested in Pressly? Could he be the closer, or do the Rangers have other alternatives in mind? It's been pretty silent the last few days, and pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training on 12 Feb (just 18 days away).
Like many pitchers Pressly was impacted when MLB banned the "magic baseball rub" which negatively impacts spin rate (Pressly had and still has a high spin rate). I would characterize Pressly as a good reliever, but not dominating. Many clubs would love to have him, but when the Astros signed Josh Hader that sent Pressly back to the set up role and he was clearly upset. A change of scenery could be just what he needs and its only a one year commitment so why not take a chance.

The salary cut for the Astros is more important than the prospect clubs may offer. I just don't know whether the Stros will want to send him to a divisional rival.
 
Rangers listed as one of seven teams expected to make biggest improvement in 2025

 
Pitchers and catchers report in two weeks, and still no established closer in the fold. Are the Rangers going to develop an internal candidate to become the closer? Or is a deal in progress for an established closer, either a Free Agent or a last-minute trade?
 
Last edited:
Pitchers and catchers report in two weeks, and still no established closer in the fold. Are the Rangers going to develop an internal candidate to become the closer? Or is a deal in progress for an established closer, either a Free Agent or a last-minute trade>?
Apparently, the Rangers are talking to Robertson about coming back to be closer or looking internally. I still think Gray or Dunning could easily move to a closer role given the starting rotation is pretty full absent injuries.

Yates signed for 13M for one year plus 1M more in possible bonuses. No way Texas could come even close to that.
 
I admire you guys enthusiasm, but you know the Stros are the class of the division this year.
 
That would not be bad for anyone they would face in the playoffs as playing more playoff games in Houston is a plus for the visiting team. :cool:
As an Astros fan this is a hard fact that will haunt us for a long time. The "Juice Box" aka Daikin Field has never been an advantage for the Astros as they lost the World Series to the Nationals losing four in Houston, lost the ALCS to the Rangers losing four in Houston, and most recently lost to the Tigers in the 2024 Wildcard losing two in Houston.

When the Astros won the WS in 2017 and acknowledged their "trash can" sign stealing methods (pretty creative), their offensive stats for the entire year were actually better on the road than they were at home.

I'm still favoring the Rangers to win the West in 2025, but the bottom of the division has improved which will likely translate into a very tight race with another sub 90 win team winning the division.

For whatever its worth, I'm going with the Rangers, Mariners, Astros, Angels and A's with no more than five games separating the Rangers and the Astros. The Astros fall will be in their pitching depth which was significantly challenged last year and is worse off going into the start of this season. Unless they make it through the season essentially injury free (starters), they will fall apart by mid season.
 
Dare to dream:


For whatever its worth, I'm going with the Rangers, Mariners, Astros, Angels and A's with no more than five games separating the Rangers and the Astros.

Until someone takes the AL West title from Houston I will continue to pick Houston. Alvarez, Altuve, and company are still a high-quality team and while they are not the dominant team of the late 20 teens they are still formidable. Don't sleep on Seattle either, the Mariners have underperformed the last several years but have a lineup and rotation that should make them a strong contender.

This should be a fun 2025 if the Rangers can stay healthy and if the bullpen doesn't become a huge liability, which with no definite closer identified yet I have real fears of.
 
For whatever its worth, I'm going with the Rangers, Mariners, Astros, Angels and A's with no more than five games separating the Rangers and the Astros. The Astros fall will be in their pitching depth which was significantly challenged last year and is worse off going into the start of this season. Unless they make it through the season essentially injury free (starters), they will fall apart by mid season.
If the Ranger starters stay healthy and by the end of May are consistently throwing 7 good innings, they will be right there. The Mariners are the wild cards, and one of these seasons the Angeles are going to play like their roster suggests that they should be playing. The A's will not be any better in Sacramento than they were in Oakland, but the homeless factor should be a lot lower.
 
Pitchers and catchers report to Arizona in one week. There's no rumor of the Rangers making any more deals - so what you see is what you get. Someone will have to emerge from the bullpen to become the closer.
 
Through May we are likely to see some rough outings once the starter is out. I know no one on that list who can consistently come in the 8th or 9th inning and shout the opposing team down.
 
I know no one on that list who can consistently come in the 8th or 9th inning and shut the opposing team down.
Valid concern, Viper. We can only hope that some relief pitcher steps up in Spring training and shows the ability to close (as well as finding the 8th inning set-up guy). It's not obvious at this point.
 
Rangers to add Andrus to Hall; statue for Beltre. Well-earned recognition for two outstanding Ranger players.
I have said this before and I know to many it is heresy but with apologies to Nolan and Pudge who are absolutely on the Rangers' Mount Rushmore, my favorite Ranger of all time (and one I suspect many other Ranger fans would also identify as their favorite) is Beltre. So this statue joining Pudge and Nolan on the walkways in is truly a great idea.

His antics with Elvis were a never-ending source of amusement.


.
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top