2020 Presidential Election: let the jockeying commence

These people are all morally corrupt

EXHtU6EWAAIQQng



EXHtU6JWsAAJ6Gk
 
These people are all morally corrupt

EXHtU6EWAAIQQng



EXHtU6JWsAAJ6Gk

She is a despicable liar.
These people are all morally corrupt

EXHtU6EWAAIQQng



EXHtU6JWsAAJ6Gk

It absolutely sickens me because of the arrogance I've seen from Liberals in my family and how they put their sick OCD Liberalism ahead of everyone. It is a mental problem. This woman is unfit for office. I can't believe people who but into Liberalism.

Where are the Democrats?
 
And yet Tara Reade only *now* sees Hillary as "enabling a sexual predator" since she is helping Joe Biden, who she (Reade) says assaulted her. Nevermind about her supporting Bill through all his "troubles". I bet Reade did not believe Lewinsky or Broaddrick, either.
 
DNC Chair Tom Perez makes the dubious choice of comparing Joe Biden’s Senate documents at the University of Delaware to "Hillary emails”

 


Don't worry, their hypocrisy knows no limits. The more evidence the more arrogant and shrill they will become. They have no standards. They only want power. Those who believe in their goodness have been sucked in by political charlatans.

I wouldn't recommend that Longest, OUBubba or Seattle vote for Trump. I would just ask why the zeal for Liberalism? It's incredible to me.
 
Don't worry, their hypocrisy knows no limits. The more evidence the more arrogant and shrill they will become. They have no standards. They only want power. Those who believe in their goodness have been sucked in by political charlatans.
I wouldn't recommend that Longest, OUBubba or Seattle vote for Trump. I would just ask why the zeal for Liberalism? It's incredible to me.

No one on the left has any thoughts about anything
It's a daily race who can show they hate Trump the most
 
Doing what they do this time every day - waiting to be told the most recent version of Orangemanbad so they can focus on that and ignore everything else. They are myopic in that pursuit.


better myopic than blind

that "you people" can continue to salute this disaster of a president is suggestive of a social pathology we haven't seen since Nixon's "I'm not a crook" routine.

Orange man is bad, even worse than Obama or W.

One of the lemmings berated me the other day for making up mocking names for Trump---I guess it never occurred to him that I was just exaggerating what Trump has done for years---ridiculing anybody he doesn't like by calling them names.

Where was his mom when he was growing up?
 
better myopic than blind

that "you people" can continue to salute this disaster of a president is suggestive of a social pathology we haven't seen since Nixon's "I'm not a crook" routine.

Orange man is bad, even worse than Obama or W.

One of the lemmings berated me the other day for making up mocking names for Trump---I guess it never occurred to him that I was just exaggerating what Trump has done for years---ridiculing anybody he doesn't like by calling them names.

Where was his mom when he was growing up?

I think you're missing something; when the Conservatives on this board attack Liberals, they are attacking the clear double-standard.

Ok, so Trump is all an a-hole and a bully. Obama was a classy guy. But are you a Conservative or a Totalitarian Socialist? Do you favor open borders or lawful enforcement of our immigration policy? Do you favor abortion laws allowing viable baby's to be killed or are you pro-life? Do you support gay marriage or a law that is one man and one woman? Do you support gender identity suggestions to children or not? Do you favor reparations or not? Do you favor subordinating ourselves to the UN or not? Did you favor the Paris "Agreement" and the manner in which it was signed as an executive order in order to bypass the Constitutional requirement that international treaties must be ratified by Congress. Would you rather a John Roberts or a Sotomayor be on SCOTUS?

Do you believe the victim or not?

What is it? We are saying the hypocrisy on the left is pathological. I don't know how a thinking person can conclude otherwise.

Let's add this:

1) Obama colluding with Russian Premier Medvedev when he said, "I'll have more flexibility after the election."
2) Obama mocking Mitt Romeny for engaging in "Cold War thinking" when Romney correctly identified Russia as our number one geopolitical threat. When that threat played out the response from the Left was to attack Trump.
3) Crimea annexed on Obama's watch.
4) Covers for the clear cronyism and corruption of the Biden family.
5) Ripped Hillary for her Iraq War Resolution vote then later supported her.


What should we say? He is a liar and a sneak or just a smooth talking incompetent?
 
Last edited:
A Connecticut woman said in April 2019 that then-Vice President Joe Biden touched her inappropriately at a Greenwich fundraiser in 2009

Connecticut woman says then-Vice President Joe Biden touched her inappropriately at a Greenwich fundraiser in 2009
Joe B's turning out to be a real creeper. If he's not copping a feel, he's forcing some woman to rub noses with him.

Traditionally politicians scanned the crowd for babies to kiss. Joe B. heads straight for the young women and teenage girls.
 
Joe B's turning out to be a real creeper. If he's not copping a feel, he's forcing some woman to rub noses with him.

Traditionally politicians scanned the crowd for babies to kiss. Joe B. heads straight for the young women and teenage girls.

A long time ago George Bush (Prez #2) was rubbing Merkle's shoulders. She looked like she didn't like it. I remember DISTINCTLY how online Liberals attacked Bush over it.

That's the thing. I have their reaction to everything logged in my head. And they leave no doubt as to their feelings. Absolute statements of fact. They go great guns without any wiggle room. Then they just deny it later with maximum arrogance. I'm sick of it. I've been sick of it for a decade. There is no doubt in my mind about this.
 
Some far-left commentators are calling for a back-up plan for the Democrats. Link. This thing will set up an interesting conundrum. Obviously most Democrats will simply apply the usual double standards and hypocrisy and crap in their pants when a Republican is accused and be concerned about due process and presumptions of innocence and scrutinizing the allegations for inconsistencies and holes when a Democrat is accused.

However, some on the Left are true believers in the ******** standard they tried to apply to Brett Kavanaugh and that Biden favored for college students - the idea that the mere allegation, no matter its flaws and inconsistencies, should be presumed true. In fact, to them even bringing up the flaws and inconsistencies is a horrible injustice to the woman.

For them, the allegation against Biden is a real demotivator and a reason to kick him off the ticket. If that happens, who's the nominee? Do they go with someone in the Biden camp like Buttigieg or Klobuchar? Do the Bernie Bros do to war to try to give him the nomination? It would get very messy.
 
However, some on the Left are true believers in the ******** standard they tried to apply to Brett Kavanaugh and that Biden favored for college students - the idea that the mere allegation, no matter its flaws and inconsistencies, should be presumed true. In fact, to them even bringing up the flaws and inconsistencies is a horrible injustice to the woman.

Where are these unicorns, I've never seen one.
 
...that "you people" can continue to salute this disaster of a president is suggestive of a social pathology we haven't seen since Nixon's "I'm not a crook" routine. Orange man is bad, even worse than Obama or W....

And so you .... do exactly what the original post you disagree with says you do

"..[wait] to be told the most recent version of Orangemanbad so [you] can focus on that and ignore everything else. [You] are myopic in that pursuit."

Doing what they do this time every day - waiting to be told the most recent version of Orangemanbad so they can focus on that and ignore everything else. They are myopic in that pursuit.
 
I made my prediction on this topic a while back.

You may be right, and if they want to win the general election, she'd be the best option. She'd take Minnesota off the board, and barring a major intraparty rebellion, she'd probably win all of the swing states except maybe Iowa and Ohio, and those would be close.

However, I could see Bernie making the pitch that if the guy who came in first can't have the nomination, the guy who came in second should. In fact, I'm sure his people will make the case. Could that entice the party to go with Elizabeth Warren to try to appease his delegates? (I think she'd have a much harder time in the general election than Klobuchar.)
 
Not speaking for NJ, but I think he means Klobuchar would replace Biden after the election when he becomes fully incapable. Like February 1, 2021.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top