Gameplan For The Four
Now that Texas has finally completed the 2016 class with some of the better Baylor recruits, it’s time to talk impact in 2016.
Donovan Duvernay
Donovan ran a 11.47 100m dash and he doesn’t have the same long speed as his brother but he is twitchy in short areas as you can see from his film.
As an offensive player he has three strengths worth mentioning; his ability to change gears in the open field, his hands, and his route running which is already solid and could become great. If the latter two traits grow strong enough, he’ll be a guy worth putting on the field in the veer and shoot.
On defense he doesn’t project well to corner due to an (estimated) 4.7 40, which is simply too little recovery speed to survive without safety help. His quickness would play better at nickel or strong safety where’d he be dangerous to throw on thanks to his ability to break on routes from zone and his flypaper hands.
In 2016, he factors in as a redshirt and useful scout team player while the coaches work out whether he’s a better hedge bet as a slot receiver or safety.
Devin Duvernay
His 10.2 100m track time combined with his Sparq numbers of a 4.32 40, 4.24 shuttle, 37.7” vertical, and 37’ power ball toss tell the story of an elite all-around athlete with “all-spark” suddenness moving in any direction over short distances and breakaway speed to boot.
Obviously the plan at Texas is to slide him into a slot position and flank him with Armanti Foreman/Collin Johnson and John Burt on the outside and then either Caleb Bluiett or DeAndre McNeal inside.
If Duvernay can reliably run four routes from the inside receiver spot, he’ll be worth his weight in gold to Texas in 2016.
The first is your standard bubble screen, and I think we can be confident that Devin will be a killer on the bubble if opposing teams don’t respect it and if Texas’ QBs are able to throw it. This route alone could prohibit most opponents from using their nickel to cheat Texas’ run game.
The second route is your typical speed out/slant combination, which he already runs effectively at the high school level.
The third route is your standard go route in which he’d just be looking to win deep in order to either take the top off or clear out space underneath for the shallow cross route.
The fourth route is the seam-read or bender, which is how you burn teams when playing in the spread-I sets with Bluiett blocking out of the backfield.
If Devin can reliably run those four types of routes with his 4.38 speed that takes the Texas offense to an entirely different level.
J.P. Urquidez
Urquidez has a lot of mixed reviews and whatever you think of him, he’s not going to be having an impact in 2016 unless something goes terribly wrong. You have to assume Kent Perkins, Connor Williams, Tristan Nickelson and probably Buck Major, Jean Delance, Hudson, and Garrett Thomas are all safely ahead of him either due to greater experience or greater physical development.
Urquidez is already good at pulling from the tackle spot, which is a very popular tactic these days for spread offenses including the veer and shoot. He has really quick feet and a clear love of the bullying aspects of OL play, it’s simply a matter of beefing up his overall strength and base to be able to parry Big 12-caliber edge rushers and learning greater technique.
I don’t think he’ll move inside to guard given his feet and reach and the fact that getting low and driving big defenders is already the weakest part of his game.
Pat Hudson
Determining the better prospect between Hudson and Devin Duvernay is a tough call as both are already elite in regards to physical attributes but Hudson’s physical traits are slightly more rare and valuable.
If he takes the field as a true freshman, Hudson will already be a superior run-blocker to the vast majority of the Big 12 conference. At 6-foot-6, 325, he’s bigger than most OL, he’s more athletic, and most importantly he’s more flexible.
There’s not much sense redshirting him as there will be at least instances in 2016 where he’s actually an upgrade over the current projected starters, particularly in short-yardage situations.
If Hudson is ready to play but needs to be featured primarily in the running game and not tasked with situations where he’s working on the edge against blitzes and premier edge rushers, then he figures in best at right guard.
The risk here is that Texas would now have true freshmen working side by side in Hudson and Shackelford and the interior would become a magnet for every kind of blitz and stunt ever designed to confuse a young guard or center.
The better scenario would be if Hudson was solid enough in pass protection to allow Perkins to move inside to guard and turn the interior OL into a solid wall in which targeting Shackelford would become exceptionally difficult for opposing DCs.
[IT]