Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Question is, would we been more competitive if Boehm started? LBJ gave up 4 runs. Offense still didn't produce enough runs had they swapped but i'm not sure LBJ should start any more.
A conundrum, if we don't have enough pitching for a third game, as it appeared in this series and most of them this year, then do we put everything into the first two? including using Boehm and Dup to close them?
Now this looks like a Regional Host level of starting 3 pitchers.Starters:
Game 1 - Boehm
Game 2 - Grubbs
Game 3 - Whitehead
That's the starting line-up I've wanted ever since everyone (including Pierce belatedly) realized LBJ was not the Friday night guy. I understand the argument of using Boehm sparingly so that he can maybe (maybe!) contribute to more than one game in a series. But a weekend like this, where he only pitches 3 innings the entire weekend, seems like a waste of his talent. It would be like saving your best batter for the 9-spot; it might pay off occasionally, but overall you're getting fewer at-bats from him.Starters:
Game 1 - Boehm
Game 2 - Grubbs
Game 3 - Whitehead
Give,
I can't disagree with your post other than to ask if you were around in the mid 80s when our 9th man in the batting order was our leader in RBIs? I wish I could remember Gus' reply when asked why he didn't move him up in the lineup, but it was typical Gus, dry and made no sense until you experienced it. Gus had a "sixth sense" about him that always seemed to work. Kinda like when he started a transfer from SMU in either the SWC tournament or the regional. Kid had played maybe 5-10 innings all year, batted half a dozen times, yet Gus stuck him in left field. When I asked him "WHY", his response was, "he's been looking pretty good in practice".
Kid was MVP of the tournament, but went back to the bench for Omaha.