Joe Biden Accomplishment Thread

But only with huge conditions that water it down to nothing. And, I'm sure only until the election is over. Then more dimocratic voters will flood the border before the next election.
Biden lacked authority to act on the border. He's doing it anyway. (usatoday.com)

Now that we have been told of a law that we can play around with (called influencing an election), it seems what just happened here needs to be dissected. Let's be real. Biden is a liar. He just rolled out an illegal EO to pretend he's doing something but what he really did, was ask the Mexicans et al to chill until after November, while guaranteeing up to 2,500 PER DAY can come over illegally without any trouble from him. And by using an illegal EO to facilitate a further crime (facilitating illegal immigration aka failure to uphold the Constitution of the United States), he should be tried as a felon. The Republicans are not the problem. The real problem is the sanctuary cities, the calls to abolish ICE, the demonization of the Border Patrol, the efforts to give them voting rights and benefits. ALL OF THESE ARE LIBERAL CONSTRUCTS. And they will never change. The Republicans know this so that is why they balk at any deals. Yet, the BA is so cynical about the intelligence of their own constituents, that they blatantly lie about it all.
 
Last edited:
The real problem is the sanctuary cities, the calls to abolish ICE, the demonization of the Border Patrol, the efforts to give them voting rights and benefits. ALL OF THIS ARE LIBERAL CONSTRUCTS.
:bow: Nailed it! :bow: And we can only hope that the voters will see through this charade in November and toss Joe out of office.
 
:bow: Nailed it! :bow: And we can only hope that the voters will see through this charade in November and toss Joe out of office.

It's a fact. They can't hide from it. The Republicans need to run ads with these facts. That's how you get around Trump's personal problems. What else can be done?
 
Now that we have been told of a law that we can play around with (called influencing an election), it seems what just happened here needs to be dissected. Let's be real. Biden is a liar. He just rolled out an illegal EO to pretend he's doing something but what he really did, was ask the Mexicans et al to chill until after November, while guaranteeing up to 2,500 PER DAY can come over illegally without any trouble from him. And by using an illegal EO to facilitate a further crime (facilitating illegal immigration aka failure to uphold the Constitution of the United States), he should be tried as a felon. The Republicans are not the problem. The real problem is the sanctuary cities, the calls to abolish ICE, the demonization of the Border Patrol, the efforts to give them voting rights and benefits. ALL OF THESE ARE LIBERAL CONSTRUCTS. And they will never change. The Republicans know this so that is why they balk at any deals. Yet, the BA is so cynical about the intelligence of their own constituents, that they blatantly lie about it all.
 
Biden often speaks without thought and lies daily
But in an interview with a Times reporter who asked what Biden was going to do in his second term. Biden said he would make Africa better including building a trans continental railroad.
Do his handlers think that will gain him black voters?
 
HHD Don't you think even Demx know Kamala couldn't hack it even being puppet handled?
I hope so - but without high confidence. The Dems were blind enough to let her get on the ballot in 2020, after her short run as a POTUS candidate exposed her lack of ability.
 
HHD Don't you think even Demx know Kamala couldn't hack it even being puppet handled?
6721, I'm going to elaborate on that a bit. One would hope (in the ideal world) that the POTUS candidate would choose his running mate with this question in mind - "If something happens to me during this term, can the VP handle the job as POTUS?" I can look back through my lifetime and note a couple of times when I thought the candidate made a terrific selection of a running mate. IMO, Reagan made a great selection with George H. W. Bush. I think Pence was a good selection by Trump. I can also see some real head-scratchers - why on Earth would Nixon select Agnew, for example. Dan Quayle wasn't a stroke of genius by Bush 41.
That's the ideal world (which rarely exists). Running mates are usually chosen to bring in votes. That's why Kamala was on the ticket - a black female - to draw in votes from those areas. IMO, she was a horrible choice, and her performance as VP (or lack of performance) should convince everybody that she absolutely couldn't handle the job if Joe doesn't complete his term.
I'll be very interested in seeing the choice DJT makes for a running mate.
 
Last edited:
Whatever they have been giving Slojo it isn't working. I'd like to be a fly on the wall when "They" listen to him lying again and again and slurring gibberish.
They" likely thought they could manage him through campaign. Hard to believe .Do they try to bluff it out with MSM providing cover?
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top