Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
We must have different definitions of virtue signaling. ...
Amusingly enough, you just got an auto-reflexive virtual virtue signal like
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We must have different definitions of virtue signaling. ...
Reminds me of that guy who tried living with grizzly bears. It worked for a while until they got hungry. They did find his video camera and it told a pretty bad ending for him and his girlfriend.
The NY Post asks a simple question -- "When will Democrats condemn the left’s growing turn to violence?...
This video was banned by Facebook, as hate speech
There does not exist many liberals willing to stick to the old school definition of 'liberal.' Maher occasionally does. Here is an example. He actually surprises the kneejerks.
The WSJ's Kimberley Strassel did a video about free speech in response to Facebook's censorship of the PragerU videos. Guess how Facebook responded?
They censored Strassel too!
Reminds you of a time in Germany about 80 years ago.
Might want to steer a clear path from this one
No problem there - she's hideous.
CNN is a business not an emotional outlet for personal beliefs.
In the absence of further information, what can we conclude? Clearly, despite the discrepancy between the results, younger people are less likely to agree with the scientifically established view of the shape of the Earth. Yet, B.o.B. and Kyrie Irving notwithstanding, the spreadsheet data indicate that they are not substantially more likely to agree that the Earth is flat. Indeed, firm belief in a flat Earth was rare, with less than a 2 percent acceptance rate in all age groups.
Rather, according to the spreadsheet data, younger people were more likely to be uncertain or ambivalent about the shape of the Earth, either agreeing that they have recently entertained doubts that the Earth is round or opting for the “Other/Not Sure” choice on the questionnaire. Importantly, these responses weren’t distinctive to those aged 18 to 24 but were comparably prevalent among those aged 25 to 34 and those aged 35 to 44.
Why, then, are younger people more likely to be uncertain or ambivalent? Perhaps they are more likely to offer frivolous or ironic responses, as Earther’s Brian Kahn suggests; perhaps they have not learned science as well as their elders did; perhaps they are more religious, as YouGov’s claim that more than half of flat-earthers considered themselves very religious hints; perhaps they are moving in social circles that encourage mistrust of authority.
Existing data helps: the fact that younger people are more likely to accept the scientifically established views on the history of life and the cause of global warming suggests that they have learned science at least as well as their elders did, and the fact that younger people are less likely to be as religious as their elders suggests that their lower levels of round-earthery are not driven only by a higher degree of religiosity.
But further survey research will be necessary to winnow the possible explanations. There is a critical lesson to be learned here: the results of a single public opinion survey are by no means authoritative. Differences in the phrasing of questions, variance in the methods of polling, randomness and error and (rarely but sadly) misconduct: all of these guarantee that a single survey should never be taken as the last word.
We have reached the inevitable portion of the timeline where being a feminist is now racist
Gotta love his sheople audience who applauds someone being censored for saying things they don't like. Would have loved a crowd shot when he essentially said they were all idiots.