Worthy: I'm getting doubled. Sark: You are. It's ok.

Statalyzer

Statalyzer

10,000+ Posts


He went 5-75 with 1 TD (should have been 6-102 with 2 TD but there was the one drop) in the first half, and then there was another time he got open but the pass missed him, so clearly, he was regularly beating his defenders. Second half: he didn't have a catch, but we had completions of 31, 32, 38, 39, and 50 yards (3 different receivers).

I suspect after his rough year last year he's a little worried about his film for NFL scouts and I can appreciate that. Also love Sark's response. And since defenses are going to be in serious "pick your poison" mode, it's going to open things back up for Worthy in the long run if we keep making them pay for focusing on him.
 
Statalyzer said:


He went 5-75 with 1 TD (should have been 6-102 with 2 TD but there was the one drop) in the first half, and then there was another time he got open but the pass missed him, so clearly, he was regularly beating his defenders. Second half: he didn't have a catch, but we had completions of 31, 32, 38, 39, and 50 yards (3 different receivers).

I suspect after his rough year last year he's a little worried about his film for NFL scouts and I can appreciate that. Also love Sark's response. And since defenses are going to be in serious "pick your poison" mode, it's going to open things back up for Worthy in the long run if we keep making them pay for focusing on him.
Click to expand...

That means the pass game is working perfectly. When you double one, that leaves 3 running with one db or no db. If we do that all season, lights out boys.
 
I beg teams to do this. Whenever I see a safety cheating over the top on Worthy, you know that someone is going to be open underneath.

More importantly, without Bijan/Roschon, we need space to create run lanes. When guys have to constantly account for Worthy, it frees up x amount of green space on the field for the backs to find. No DBs coming up to assist.

I really feel like we've only seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of what this scheme is capable of. I wouldn't be surprised if we tried some crazy **** with Keilan Robinson this week.
 
Statalyzer said:


He went 5-75 with 1 TD (should have been 6-102 with 2 TD but there was the one drop) in the first half, and then there was another time he got open but the pass missed him, so clearly, he was regularly beating his defenders. Second half: he didn't have a catch, but we had completions of 31, 32, 38, 39, and 50 yards (3 different receivers).

I suspect after his rough year last year he's a little worried about his film for NFL scouts and I can appreciate that. Also love Sark's response. And since defenses are going to be in serious "pick your poison" mode, it's going to open things back up for Worthy in the long run if we keep making them pay for focusing on him.
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting Sark's comments above. Love it. And I couldn't agree more with your assessment.
 
Horns11 said:
I beg teams to do this. Whenever I see a safety cheating over the top on Worthy, you know that someone is going to be open underneath.

More importantly, without Bijan/Roschon, we need space to create run lanes. When guys have to constantly account for Worthy, it frees up x amount of green space on the field for the backs to find. No DBs coming up to assist.

I really feel like we've only seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of what this scheme is capable of. I wouldn't be surprised if we tried some crazy **** with Keilan Robinson this week.
Click to expand...
Frankly, I'm hopeful we see a breakout game for Neyor. Just so future opponents have yet another weapon to worry about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Back
Top