Why didn't Romney say...

[Roger35]

"Well Newt, that's like saying you couldn't complete your term as Speaker because you got kicked out by your colleagues for ethics violations." in last night's republican debate?

Or if he wanted to go real low he could've said "that's like saying you couldn't stay married to your first and second wives because of your infidelity?

In response to the bully Gingrich saying this:

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Uninformed]

I do not think slinging mud is smart politics. I don't think it would have been wise for Obama to comment about Clinton's perjury and I don't think it would be wise for Romney to comment on Newt. - It would just hurt both of them. As a matter of fact, Newt gained political momentum by uniting Republican candidates against Obama rather than against each other.

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Bevo Incognito]

It was pretty funny to hear Perry say that a man who will cheat on his wife will cheat on his business partner.

 

[ShinerTX]

Roger, why do you care?

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[ShinerTX]

Sorry, but coming from such an Obama cheerleader, I'm not quite sure of your analysis. Everything else I read indicates both Newt and Mitt debated well.

 

[314]

OMG, Newt is a bully.

Whaaa! Whaa!! Whaa!

Obama knows he's going to get wiped up in the debates by newt, which is why he will push for special rules and teleprompters. Obama's only ideas are to spend more taxpayer money. At least Gingrich has some original thoughts, he's not a puppet like Obama is to Axelrod.

 

[mcbrett]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[314]

Clinton was a 200 time adulterer, and I bet you think he was the best president ever.

What does any of what you posted have to do with Obama having to have a teleprompter to read the ideas Alexrod makes him spew?

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[314]

What does Ronald Reagan have to do with it either?

 

[majorwhiteapples]

It is called Loser Desperation!!!

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[314]

What outrage? You posted this, remember? Your initial post is fuill of crying because Newt is a bully.

Whaaa! Whaaa!

 

[Roger35]

No, tough guy, I was responding to your statement:

In reply to:

---

---

 

[ShinerTX]

Have you read Reagan's speech from that day? It was outstanding.

 

[314]

Ronald Reagan's inner circle was competent. And he was famous for going against his inner circle if you read documentaires about him.

for example, the Berlin Wall speech.

But don't let facts get in teh way of your crying because Newt is so mean. Whaa! Whaa!

 

[Michtex]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Roger35]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[general35]

I was wondering if you had the same opinion of reagan of spewing cr@p reading from a teleprompter written by his inner circle?
__________________________________________________

most people dont have a problem with presidents reading from a prompter for big speeches, they have all done it. however, most dont go around using prompters for simple q&a's and introducing visitors to the white house in the rose garden. when that happens, you get the appearance of being a little over produced. followers like you wont care though so it doesnt matter.

 

[314]

The Air force one incidenet wasn't crying. He expected Clinton to talk about the budget, and he didn't.

Crying would be Bill Clinton telling the media they were favoring Barack over his husband in 2008.