Which candidate would Al-Qaeda vote for?

B

brntorng

2,500+ Posts
If members of Al-Qaeda had a vote in the primary, who would they vote for, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, Hillary, or Obama?
 
Huckabee.

Hook'em!!!
texasflag.gif
 
Anybody who will keep the war going. They don't want a solution, just recruiting points.
 
I was going to say McCain, because they want a permanent war, but they also want a divided squabling America, so they would probably prefer Huckabee.
 
they might pick hillary in the hope that she would ignore their existence the way her husband did.
 
Well, given the fact that W has had 7 years to catch bin Laden and still doesn't have a clue where he is, if I were bin Laden I'd be hoping somehow, someway, that Bush would remain in power.
 
hillary. women can't do anything according to them. with hillary, they're actually right.
 
I love the west mall..we can make up anything and state it as fact.

Yes...if Al Gore were president I bet we would've just cleaned up the mess from the towers and moved on with our global warming crusade. Hell, I bet he would've invited Bin Laden over for dinner...

And it's also funny to imply that it's SOOOOOOO unlikely that Gore would've found bin laden when Bush has had 7 years to do without success.

He may not have found him....but he couldn't of done any worse. That's really the only thin we know is fact.
 
who cares if bush has found bin laden - that's not the point. we haven't been attacked again, have we?
i reiterate that they would vote for hillary. that way they could murder americans and expect nothing more than a few missiles to an abandoned aspirin factory in return.
 
They might as well have attacked us. We've gotten 4000 US troops killed in a war in a country that was not an Al Qaeda stronghold when we showed up and was not threat to us until after we got there.

Why would they attack us when we're perfectly willing to put ourselves in harm's way in Iraq which serves the dual purpose of weakening our efforts in Afganistan?

As for the anti-torture, habeas corpus, anti-civilain casualty rant, if we supported all of that garbage what exactly would be the difference between us and the terrorists?
 
i love when people point to recruitment being up. maybe al qaueda will release a list today with all of there international letters of intent.
i heard they just recruited a retarded guy who runs a 4.6 and can bench 225 one hundred and fifty times.
 
Leave it to a republican to be unable to tell the difference between total war between two dedicated nation states and fighting a militant group within a non-combatant country.

Al-Qaeda wants open ware with the US, and for that W is the perfect match for them, as he gives them very public recruiting tools. I think McCain might give them more of what they want. I see HRC as being more of a knife-in-the-dark covert war president. That's the last thing they want, getting hunted down individually without a bit enthusiasm-generating invasion of the holy land.
 
Indeed. Bush did everything Muslim extremists wanted him to do. One would think that they have a high placed mole in his advisory circle. He lead us into a meaningless war (for us) that had nothing to do with Islamic terrorism and weakened our efforts elsewhere considerably. It also proved to be extremely unpopular with Muslims in the middle-east, that lead to better recruiting and sympathy for the extremist elements. If we were targeting religious extremists, any other country was better than Irq. Saddam was a paranoid dictator who tolerated no other power, including Islamic terrorists.
 
Romney - Mormons and Muslims - pro polygamy . Or Obama, because it sounds like Osama.

In all seriousness though, no offense, this thread is ludicrous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top