US Embassy in Yemen

Bevo1970

100+ Posts
This thread was originally submitted by member = Horn6721
This post was made just before going to the new 2015 platform. Post as normal after it if you wish.

Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/11/15 10:37 AM
US Embassy in Yemen

eek.gif

from CNN link
"



Sanaa, Yemen (CNN)—Houthi rebels took all U.S. Embassy vehicles parked at the Yemeni capital's airport and wouldn't allow departing U.S. Marines to take their weapons with them, a top airport official in Sanaa said Wednesday.

The actions come after the United States, along with Britain, suspended operations at their respective embassies and moved out staffers because of the instability in the Arab nation.

According to the official, the Houthis seized many U.S. Marines' weapons at the airport and the American troops also handed over some to random airport officials.

Yemeni employees at the American Embassy in Sanaa also said that embassy officials burned tens of thousands of documents Tuesday night and destroyed weapons that were inside the embassy's storage warehouses.


edition.cnn.com/2015/02/11/middleeast/yemen-unrest/
This is pretty amazing, that we apparently didn't have contingency plans for this kind of action( to render any vehicles unusable, to expose our marines like that)>
Oh wait I forgot. Yemen was a success story, secure and safety of our embassy.
BO in Sept
" Talking about the threat posed by the Islamic State, Obama pointed toward Yemen and Somalia as possible examples:


This counterterrorism campaign will be waged through a steady, relentless effort to take out [the Islamic State] wherever they exist, using our air power and our support for partner forces on the ground. This strategy of taking out terrorists who threaten us, while supporting partners on the front lines, is one that we have successfully pursued in Yemen and Somalia for years."
The Link


and this is what many including people at waPO thought back then
"Even back then, many who knew the situation in Yemen questioned that logic. My colleague Ishaan Tharoor argued that Yemen was an example of "U.S. mission creep, not success," and that the threat posed by AQAP was still very real (after AQAP claimed to be behind the high-profile attacks in Paris this month, that point grew stronger). "Very few people who are not part of the administration consider either of those cases a success," the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman wrote.

.

Someone asked what should be done instead of just criticizing this ignorant POS
How about listening to people in DOD CIA etc and not automatically rejecting their opinions in favor of the Susan Rice's etc?

Is there anyone on this board who thought back in Sept that, oh yea Yemen is a success story. How many would have AT LEAST made sure our Embassy was secure and there were plans for successful evac?


Seattle Husker
(5000+ posts)
02/11/15 11:11 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Wait...they weren't evacuated? It looks to me like they were evacuated, at least the article you posted says they were. Isn't that a success? They destroyed the documents and the weapons stores. So they had their small arms and vehicles taken at the airport. Did you expect them to take the vehicles with them? I suspect they never intended to take them. Losing the small arms...meh. Again, based on that article they were evacuated successfully.

On what to do in Yemen. You didn't offer an alternate solution. You never do. Nothing you posted offers an alternate solution to the drone strikes and partnering with the locals. What specifically was recommended by the DOD and not followed?

Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/11/15 12:11 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Husker
I used the words successful evacuation.
Do You think it was successful?

do you think having our Marines confronted by islamists and their weapons taken away is a successful evacuation?
How about leaving usuable vehicles behind?


What would I have done? I would have made sure contingency plans were in place for Yemen and any embassy in that area. It isn't like this Embassy hasn't taken fire before OR that we have never had a consul in that region attacked.
as far as what people at the DOD CIA have said there are many
but here are 3 pretty prominent ones who have spoken out pretty harshly- Gates Panetta Flynn. You can easily google etc it and get many links
here is one from General Flynn. read in particular the comment by the article author The Link


"It is striking to me how many security officials have gone public against this administration after leaving. This is not a normal pattern, and by this point amounts to a non-partisan indictment of how Obama’s White House has dealt with a variety of national security issues. Among other things, it makes me appreciate the restraint that the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, must be exercising on a daily basis."

Of course you can say we don't know for sure any of these people spoke out to BO. We only have their word.
Would you really believe people who had been in the service of our country for decades woul all of them lie?



Seattle Husker
(5000+ posts)
02/11/15 04:12 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen



In reply to:
but here are 3 pretty prominent ones who have spoken out pretty harshly- Gates Panetta Flynn. You can easily google etc it and get many links





LOL. You couldn't bring yourself to mention former Sec. of State Clinton in that list that you took from this article.

In reply to:
Flynn’s comments echo calls by other former Obama administration officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and former CIA Director and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta who all say they urged more intervention earlier in the Syrian conflict.





You should also mention that this is Flynn's position:

In reply to:
Recently retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn called for the U.S. to lead the charge in a sweeping, decades-long campaign against the Islamic State group, al Qaeda, and its ilk—a fight like the one against the former Soviet Union—against a new enemy he said is “committed to the destruction of freedom and the American way of life.”





Though I think that is where we'll end up, how willing to you think the American population is to sign up for that? Heck, we have partisan alignment NOT to put boots on the ground against ISIS. Rather, it's easier to say that others have different ideas, ideas that they don't have to carry out because they have retired and now get paid by the speaking engagement or to make commentary.
Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/11/15 05:01 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Husker
??
I honestly did not see Clinton's name in the link I provided. But I am more than happy to add her to the list.
Honestly was that something to criticize ? I will go back and read my link again to see her name but YES Clinton is added to the list.



Bevo Incognito
(1000+ Posts)
02/11/15 06:12 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen



In reply to:
What would I have done? I would have made sure contingency plans were in place for Yemen and any embassy in that area






Contingency plans to do what?
 
Last edited:
Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/11/15 07:32 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

BI?
Are you serious? Truly?
How about contingency plans to evacuate the embassy in such a way we don't leave vehicles and weaponry for those who caused the evac.
BI
are you ok with our Marines being confronted by islamists at the airport and forced to give up their weapons?
God I hope not but the very fact you actually asked what contingency plans were needed is quite sad.

Larry T. Spider
(2500+ posts)
02/11/15 07:49 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

I find it interesting that when 10+ embassies were seriously attacked under bush and Americans were killed we blamed the crazy ******** that did it. When the embassy in Yemen is attacked and no Americans were killed, it's Obamas fault. Below is about one that happened in the same damn country and people were killed.

In reply to:
September 17, 2008. Sana’a, Yemen. Terrorists dressed as military officials attack the U.S. Embassy with an arsenal of weapons including RPGs and detonate two car bombs. Sixteen people are killed, including an American student and her husband (they had been married for three weeks when the attack occurred). This is the second attack on this embassy in seven months.




Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/11/15 08:53 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Don't forget so called Christians during the Crusades killed too.
brickwall.gif

Incredible.
Infreakinincredible.
It must be Bush's fault

So Larry let's say it is Bush's fault and we didn't do enough back then.
Does that give BO a pass?
Did YOU think any embassy in that region should have had contingency plans to prevent this? Do you think people in power BO etc could have learned anything from Bush's failure?
I expected better from you. Why would it be relevant to blame Bush or bring him up? How stupid does it make BO look that he didn't learn anything.
Was Benghazi also on Bush?

It is sickening to see that something so predictable, especially when Larry adds in Bush failures
something so predictable wasn't deemed by the BO state Dept as necessary to make plans.
And to learn the BO State Dept ordered the Marines to surrender their weapons
A Marine ordered to give up their weapons.
anyone who has ever served understands that is not something you ever do.,
should we blame Bush for that too?


Larry T. Spider
(2500+ posts)
02/11/15 09:07 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

What is predictable is that you are bashing Obama for a problem that has been going on forever. If we had these threads when your side was in office then I would think that you have a legitimate concern. Instead I think you are just taking the opportunity to bash Obama because you don't like him. In this instance nobody died and you are still bashing him. I don't like the guy either and voted against him 3 times if you count the primary but it makes you look desperate when you only complain about one sides failures while giving your own party a pass.

The Bush didn't get a thread embassy attack list:

January 22, 2002. Calcutta, India. Gunmen associated with Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami attack the U.S. Consulate. Five people are killed.

June 14, 2002. Karachi, Pakistan. Suicide bomber connected with al-Qaida attacks the U.S. Consulate, killing 12 and injuring 51.

October 12, 2002. Denpasar, Indonesia. U.S. diplomatic offices bombed as part of a string of “Bali Bombings.” No fatalities.

February 28, 2003. Islamabad, Pakistan. Several gunmen fire upon the U.S. Embassy. Two people are killed.

May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al-Qaida terrorists storm the diplomatic compound killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.

July 30, 2004. Tashkent, Uzbekistan. A suicide bomber from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan attacks the U.S. Embassy, killing two people.

December 6, 2004. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Al-Qaida terrorists storm the U.S. Consulate and occupy the perimeter wall. Nine people are killed.

March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name “David Foy.” This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on what’s considered American soil.)

September 12, 2006. Damascus, Syria. Four armed gunmen shouting “Allahu akbar” storm the U.S. Embassy using grenades, automatic weapons, a car bomb and a truck bomb. Four people are killed, 13 are wounded.

January 12, 2007. Athens, Greece. Members of a Greek terrorist group called the Revolutionary Struggle fire a rocket-propelled grenade at the U.S. Embassy. No fatalities.

March 18, 2008. Sana’a, Yemen. Members of the al-Qaida-linked Islamic Jihad of Yemen fire a mortar at the U.S. Embassy. The shot misses the embassy, but hits nearby school killing two.
July 9, 2008. Istanbul, Turkey. Four armed terrorists attack the U.S. Consulate. Six people are killed.



Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/12/15 08:37 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Larry
That is indeed a long list of attacks during Bush era.
Do you think BO has seen that list?

Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/12/15 08:55 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Update
There are conflicting report on the evacuation
here from Stars and Stripes
"In a show of bravado against the Americans, the rebels seized the cars of U.S. diplomats left at the airport on the way out."
nd
"More than 25 vehicles abandoned by departing American embassy staffers at Sanaa airport were seized by the rebels, according to airport officials. The rebels also took weapons that were left in the vehicles, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press."
and
"The embassy's Marine detachment, which escorted the cars, left their personal sidearms behind since they would be unable to take them on the commercial flights they were leaving on, Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren told reporters in Washington. They destroyed their heavier weapons — automatic weapons and machine guns — before leaving the embassy, he said.

The Marines later issued a statement saying no usable weapons were left behind. It said crew-served weapons at the embassy were destroyed and the Marine Security Force left for the airfield with only personal weapons that were later smashed with sledgehammers." The Link

It is a shame that the islamists got anything but I hope the Marine statement is true, that they didn't leave any of their weapons for the lislamists.
I also hope BO and State make some better contingency plans to evacuate. Having our people and Marines go to an airport when they are leaving do to dangerous conditions with people fighting in the city.
Forcing Marines to destroy their weapons leaving them defenseless as they went into the airport ispretty dicey.

Did BO learn nothing from what happened under Bush?
or hey! from Benghazi?
 
Seattle Husker
(5000+ posts)
02/12/15 10:37 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen



In reply to:
It is a shame that the islamists got anything but I hope the Marine statement is true, that they didn't leave any of their weapons for the lislamists.
I also hope BO and State make some better contingency plans to evacuate. Having our people and Marines go to an airport when they are leaving do to dangerous conditions with people fighting in the city.
Forcing Marines to destroy their weapons leaving them defenseless as they went into the airport ispretty dicey.

Did BO learn nothing from what happened under Bush?
or hey! from Benghazi?





Kudos to coming back and offering updated information that displayed your initial criticism may be unfounded based on new reports. You can't bring yourself to say that this should be considered a successful evacuation. Everyone got out successfully. Your assumption is that the state department didn't learn from Benghazi in this evacuation is based purely on your partisan lens.

When your hypocrisy of criticism of the Obama admin was put on display to the entire board rather than hone up to it and admit that when the very same (or worse) actions occurred when your party was in office it wasn't seen as a big deal.

The reality is that very little likely changed between Benghazi and now in terms of crisis handling. In fact, very little changed between the Bush admin and Obama admin. These activities are very standard operating procedure. Sure there is some uniqueness given the topography of each embassy and surrounding are but activities like destroying documents and weapons caches, transport to nearby airports, etc is all the same. It's based on tried and true methods. A new POTUS or SOS doesn't suddenly have new ideas.

It's good this was a very successful evacuation but not surprising you can't admit that. Maybe if some conservative blog was able to give credit you'd be able to admit it? Who am I fooling? They'll move on to the next faux criticism.
Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/12/15 10:56 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

It is only right to offer information that seems to contradict what the Pentagon reported.
You and I will disagree but I don't think an evacuation where vehicles and weaponry get left for the islamists is a successful evac.

This article from military.com is interesting both in reporting some weapons were destroyed and some weapons and vehicles were taken by the islamists,
Nor was there a reason given why we didn't military evac them instead of forcing them to go to a civilian airport which you would agree is more dangerous.


from Pentagon spokesman
"A Marine spokesman could not immediately say whether the surrender of weapons by Embassy Marines in an evacuation was unprecedented.

The Marines "destroyed their crew served weapons. They left their personal weapons behind," Warren said, but he could not say whether the Houthi rebels who have taken over much of the country now had the weapons and vehicles left by the Marines.

Warren also could not say why a civilian charter flight was used rather than military aircraft for the evacuation. He suggested that the handover of weapons may have resulted from international rules barring weapons on a civilian flight."


The Link

I can't remember all embassy evacs lately but I know when the Embassy in S, sudan was evacuated last year we sent in 2 135's.
When we evacuated embassy in Tripoli we sent military aircraft and military escort to Tunisa for some staff.
I would think we had military assets close to Yemen.

Seattle Husker
(5000+ posts)
02/12/15 04:58 PM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen



In reply to:
I can't remember all embassy evacs lately but I know when the Embassy in S, sudan was evacuated last year we sent in 2 135's.
When we evacuated embassy in Tripoli we sent military aircraft and military escort to Tunisa for some staff.
I would think we had military assets close to Yemen.





The assumptions in your statement are twofold: 1) Yemen was considered as dangerous as the other two and 2) Military transport is safer, quicker or more reliable than the civilian charter they had lined up.

Do we know those assumptions to be valid?
Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/13/15 09:39 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

Husker1. was Yemen as dangerous as Tripoli and sudan ?
well the islamists had been fighting since first part of Jan, has ousted the President and in mid Jan even DiFI felt State should err on side of caution considering what happened at Benghazi.

as to whether the US had assets it could have used quicker and more safely according to the US Navy.
"“They have not been given the order to aid in an evacuation as of now,” said Navy information officer Lt. Cmdr. Sarah Flaherty. “But they are in the immediate vicinity should the need arise.”

Multiple news outlets have reported that the pair of amphibious ships were sent there specifically to aid in a Yemen evacuation, but Flaherty said that the move was part of their “normal operations and no order has yet been given.” The Link

As note in the link Camp Lemonnier Djbouti Africa across from Yemen has a good number of air assets including
Marine CH35s also Hercules and if not always there can be there in hours a C-17 globemaster

so what do You think Husker?
Many in Congress including Dems felt in Jan the danger was escalating.
And we had assets near there for the express purpose of evacuating
s o why was it left to the last minute to the point ( according to news reports)we left 24 vehicles with the friggin keys in them?
and we were forced to destroy weaponry at the embassy as well as force Marines to use slege hammers on their side arms at the airport?

which brings up another question, why didn't the Marines use the sledgehammers on the vehicles both at the embassy and at the airport where there parked their cars?

Using the measures of the previous evacuations in the past year this was a so far unexplained F'up.

Horn6721
(10,000+ posts)
02/14/15 09:24 AM
Re: US Embassy in Yemen

As more information comes out, some of it from State it is clear this was another F'upped operation.

I am not sure which islamist group caused yet another embassy evac.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top