Uh no. Twitter is publicly traded. Musk wants to take it private.What position are you referencing? Twitter is a private company. Right? Musk is hurting their value as he’s “negotiating” with them, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh no. Twitter is publicly traded. Musk wants to take it private.What position are you referencing? Twitter is a private company. Right? Musk is hurting their value as he’s “negotiating” with them, right?
I posted today in breaks of yard work for my youngests HS graduation without my glasses. Like a drunk aggy.As a publicly traded company, they have obligations under the SEC guidelines. Elon is shining a light on the fact that they may very well have lied and lied for MANY years in those documents. Lying in SEC filings is perpetuating a fraud upon shareholders and prospective shareholders. AND, as it relates to the proposed purchase, $TWTR has not come to the table with clean hands...as I have stated elsewhere, Elon should have perhaps done more due diligence, but he ALSO has a reasonable presumption under the law that the company honestly advanced position statements in the filings required under federal securities law. Twitter being a private company that trades publicly does not allow them leeway to misstate things in a Prospectus, 10Q, 10K or any other filing which is designed to convey information to shareholders...
Interestingly enough, $TWTR is up today while the broader market is down.
Oh, and since Elon is ALSO a substantial shareholder, he is most assuredly aware of the current per-share prices.
The board acts for the shareholders. They can kick people off if they so choose. They can limit speech. Bill of rights does not apply.Uh no. Twitter is publicly traded. Musk wants to take it private.
You celebrated your youngest's graduation by performing yard work for them, or is that what Okies do to mark milestones in the life of a young Okie? Cut the grass every 18 years? Your youngest is graduating without your glasses? WTH is going on with Okies these days?I posted today in breaks of yard work for my youngests HS graduation without my glasses. Like a drunk aggy.
what has twitter done that is illegal?
Liberals.Your post is lying put the facts. Who poops facts?
That has nothing to do with whether they are public or private. Board members are generally voted off boards, not “kicked off” if they are not liked. Private companies have boards too.The board acts for the shareholders. They can kick people off if they so choose. They can limit speech. Bill of rights does not apply.
Ownership is irrelevant. Twitter suspended trump, Alex Jones, etc. surely they could reasonably suspend someone who’s damaging their product as he tries to buy it. It’s the equivalent of tossing termites around the house after you made a offer and then trying to negotiate a lower price because of termites. That’s my point.That has nothing to do with whether they are public or private. Board members are generally voted off boards, not “kicked off” if they are not liked. Private companies have boards too.
They may not be able to answer...after all, they registered in September of 2005 and only have one post...and that was circa 2008. They may be on a quota of one reply every couple of decades.
If they have misstated the amount of bot traffic in those filings, it is a cousin of the cooking of the books that did Enron in. It is a breach of the fiduciary responsibility precisely because they have lied to shareholders and prospective shareholders in federally-mandated filings. You don't get to make **** up out of whole cloth and sell it as a 10K or 10Q.I posted today in breaks of yard work for my youngests HS graduation without my glasses. Like a drunk aggy.
what has twitter done that is illegal?
Speech infringement takes many forms beyond simply the #1A protections...but there have also been limits imposed at the behest of the federal government, which does carry potential #1A implications. Further, they have made federally-mandated filings in which they profess to abhor limitations and that they view themselves as the town square. And while it may be a truism that the Board is tasked with looking out for shareholder value, suppressing much of the content of one side of a discussion is NOT maximizing shareholder value and is, arguably, HARMING said valuations...The board acts for the shareholders. They can kick people off if they so choose. They can limit speech. Bill of rights does not apply.
Good thing you don't do civil litigation...because if you did, you clearly missed the day they discussed 'unclean hands' by a party to a proposed contract.Well. The way I see it is that Elon has to either purchase at the price offered or lose his “earnest money”. Trolling twitter executives is not the typical way to perform an inspection.
Theey can negotiate down but I don’t see that happening.
Here is how it works:Well. The way I see it is that Elon has to either purchase at the price offered or lose his “earnest money”. Trolling twitter executives is not the typical way to perform an inspection.
Theey can negotiate down but I don’t see that happening.
This is funny.
Elon should be banned as he's damaging their stock price. How's that purchase coming?Nobody can possibly be surprised at internal twitter chat about banning a conservative account.
Elon should be banned as he's damaging their stock price. How's that purchase coming?
Do you not realize he isn't going to take actions to harm his own holdings? He ALREADY owns roughly 10% of the stock that is out there.Elon should be banned as he's damaging their stock price. How's that purchase coming?
* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC