This Jena 6 member was obviously a victim..

What is this supposed to prove?

Just because he may not be a victim in this last incident, does not exclude him from being a possible victim in the prior one.
 
ironically, the events in carrollton mirror the events in jena only he was charged with a felony crime in jena. the kid is bad news period.
 
Just because he may not be a victim in this last incident, does not exclude him from being a possible victim in the prior one.
__________________________________________________

so you believe the story propogated by Al and Jesse? That story has about as much bs in it as a cow pasture.
 
Sounds like he's a punk *** *****.

And in the original Jena situation, it sounded like the black characters in that drama were all punk *** *******.

But the point remains that punk *** ******* should be treated proportionately based on their punk *** bitchery, not on their race.

Punk *** ******* of equal punk *** bitchery should get equal punishment, regardless of race. THAT was the problem in Jena. Not that these guys were innocent, but because they were no more guilty than the white kids, and got materially different treatment. Treat them all the same. If they all deserve 10 years, they all deserve 10 years. If they all deserve probation, they all deserve probation. It was the disparity that drew the outrage, not the fact that there was punishment at all.

This guy is trouble. Treat him accordingly. The fact that he now has a history of multiple offenses puts him in a higher category than before -- the law should treat him accordingly. Throw his punk *** in the hoosegow.
 
Brisketexan, I liked all you said except that what the black kids did was no worse than what the white kids did???? A frigging prank to a chicken **** 6 on 1 beat down????
 
Kerbouchard -- you are absolutely right when it's couched in a tit for tat way. I wasn't clear on that -- my bad.

I was referring to the fact that white bad actors in Jena who had committed similar infractions in the past had not faced as harsh an approach. Sorry -- I should have been more clear.
 
Did any of you get in fights in high school?

I did and they were called scraps, these days it is assault.

Sometimes if you are black they are called felonies.

This proves nothing in regards to the outrageous charges that happened in Jena.
 
Mr. Wizard, yes I got into many fights all through school. And it was just boys being boys, we got licks, and that was that. But even with my rural redneck upbringing, ANY fight that was 6 or 1 was not the norm. It would be considered chicken ****, no matter the color of the fighters. But if you had a 6 or 1 white on black or black on white, it would be considered more than just a regular fight.

Based on my limited knowledge, I would not have charged the six with attempted murder, but I would have charged them as strongly as I could legally, just shy of that.

And just for a reminder, according to the 2004 FBI National Crime Victimization Survey, in the case of interracial crimes, more than twice as many whites are murdered by blacks than cases of whites murdering blacks. So don't make this out like the norm in our society is poor helpless abused blacks are suffering at the hands of mean oppressive whites. Thats bull ****.
 
if i had good reason to think someone ****** with my **** and i found out they did (we don't know in this case) i'd kick their *** too. if the guy f'd with his **** he got what he deserved.
 
A 18 year old kid kicking someone's *** for messing with his car? That 100% proves that there should have been no controversy in Jena.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Back
Top