I've wondered about this for years. People run for office and appeal to voters on issues of limited to no relevance to the office. I don't blame them for doing it. Most people would fall asleep if you ran for Land or Agriculture Commissioner on the actual details of the job, but it's sad nevertheless.
Should maximum voter participate really be the goal? I think the fewer idiots who vote (and are therefore influenced by irrelevant nonsense), the better.
Should maximum voter participate really be the goal? I think the fewer idiots who vote (and are therefore influenced by irrelevant nonsense), the better.