It seems to me the money the government spends not collected from taxes amounts to a communist styled command 'economy'.
In our case, we have mandated programs, worse than communist five year plans, taking the place of a dictator. They are longer and don't die with their author.
Our 'dictator' body of mandates decides what me must spend, not what we can afford to spend.
Smart people get confused and begin to think all you need to do to grow an economy is spend more money, not taking into account scarce resources must be allocated to those best able to create the greatest aggregate cardinal utility from those resources. They also fail to see that only individuals aggregating in free markets can achieve this greatest aggregate cardinal utility.
Here is an example of one such man I know to be smart: Miguel de Icaza
Why Mitt does not need an Economic Plan
In our case, we have mandated programs, worse than communist five year plans, taking the place of a dictator. They are longer and don't die with their author.
Our 'dictator' body of mandates decides what me must spend, not what we can afford to spend.
Smart people get confused and begin to think all you need to do to grow an economy is spend more money, not taking into account scarce resources must be allocated to those best able to create the greatest aggregate cardinal utility from those resources. They also fail to see that only individuals aggregating in free markets can achieve this greatest aggregate cardinal utility.
Here is an example of one such man I know to be smart: Miguel de Icaza
Why Mitt does not need an Economic Plan